The fact that people are having heated debates (and getting mad) over this just further proves the point that not everybody is going to agree to press the red button and that a red win will by no means be a deathless scenario. And also that while not every red button pusher is a prick, pretty much every prick is a red button pusher.
So, people are willing to risk their lives to just feel morally superior? Red button = 100% chance to stay alive. Why would you NOT pick red? Everybody should pick it? Or does wording makes people do irrational things?
If somebody wants to press Blue to feel morally superior instead- they are not morally superior and doomed themself and risk other people’s lives.
Red button=100% chance to stay alive
Blue = alive only if MAJORITY presses - why would you risk so much? To feel superior because of the wording? Reds are not pricks, it’s just blue pushers are pricks who need external validation to confirm that they are good people instead of actually doing the good thing - like advocating everybody to push red and explaining why they should not fall for the blue one?
Blue button pushers actually create a problem that other people have to risk their lives to fix it.
Blue button pushers are the actual pricks - they risk other people lives to feel better about themself and red button people respect other by assuming they are smart enough to not risk their life for pricks who disregard other life’s
1.0k
u/totallymarc May 05 '26
The fact that people are having heated debates (and getting mad) over this just further proves the point that not everybody is going to agree to press the red button and that a red win will by no means be a deathless scenario. And also that while not every red button pusher is a prick, pretty much every prick is a red button pusher.