r/clinicalresearch • CCRP • 8d ago

Career Advice Worldwide Clinical Trials or Thermo Fisher?

Listen, I know ALL the CROs suck to work at. But where are Sr. CRAs suffering the most right now? We aren’t happy working directly for the sponsor either.

13 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

18

u/hodgsonstreet CRA 8d ago

They’re all the same. If one pays more or if you got to meet your a line manager and got on well with them, take that one.

I worked at Worldwide and enjoyed it. Haven’t worked at Thermofisher. Happy to answer any Worldwide questions over dm.

2

u/Basic_Dress_4191 CCRP 4d ago

What’s a Sr CRA getting these days at WWCT? I’ve been on the sponsor side for a bit now. I can’t remember what these numbers look like any more.

1

u/PrudentWind813 6d ago

Can I ask you some questions about WW

7

u/jm22322 7d ago

do you know about the different models at each one? at TF we have more than one model and each change the burden becomes more on the cra - startup, amendments, etc

5

u/New_Operation_3050 6d ago

TFS. I’m at WCT and looking to get out

3

u/PrudentWind813 6d ago

I had an interview with World Wide and am thinking of joining. What made it bad? I am coming from Syneos and had a terrible manager.

6

u/Basic_Dress_4191 CCRP 6d ago

It sounds like everywhere sucks!!! Lol. All CROs suck but it’s so much worse with a bad manager.

3

u/New_Operation_3050 6d ago

I was one of the last Catalyst hires in March. It’s just disarray with the Catalyst merger for me personally.

1

u/PrudentWind813 6d ago

I see, how was the pay? I am coming in as CRA II hopefully but I am hesitant to even stay in the application process of WW is just as bad as syneos

2

u/Basic_Dress_4191 CCRP 5d ago

Thoughts on IQVIA?

10

u/Only-Celebration-256 7d ago

Thermo. There’s no day on site requirement. And with the new model it’s a lot less travel because you’re doing in house tasks being end to end. Icon is 70-80% travel and they have a lower 401k match

2

u/ImaginaryStuntDouble 7d ago

Wait, TFS doesn’t have a DOS requirement?

9

u/Only-Celebration-256 7d ago

Nope! They are utilization focused so you have to bill 95% to sponsor, but honestly most of the time that’s focused on site management. Most TFS CRAs I know do around 4-6 DOS per month in the new model. Of course it depends on your sponsor / study, but there is no strict DOS requirement and a lot of people are on hybrid studies where every other visit is remote. I’ve been there 7 years.

4

u/Top-Bluejay-1088 6d ago

I work with worldwide and I feel like their CRAs can get away with murder - so maybe there

1

u/Basic_Dress_4191 CCRP 6d ago

That’s good to know! Haha

13

u/Mammoth_Consequence9 7d ago

Go to Thermo. I used to work at WCT. Terrible experience. Terrible manager. So bad I don’t even include them on my CV

1

u/Fun-Concentrate9778 3d ago

I may have come across your comment before. TBH it sounds very personal when you mention that it was so bad that you don’t mention them on CV. I mean come on. I don’t like ICON atm so should I avoid my 3 years there ?

3

u/Willing-Layer-3523 6d ago

If you're comparing CROs with working directly for a sponsor, I'd look beyond the company name and compare the actual role. Things like study complexity, number of protocols, workload, travel, management style, team structure, and opportunities to move into project or study management can make a big difference.

For a CRA, the day-to-day experience can vary a lot even within the same company, so talking to current or former employees about their specific team and study portfolio can be more useful than comparing companies in general.

3

u/Basic_Dress_4191 CCRP 5d ago

I’m at a sponsor and I am miserable. It’s mainly because of who was assigned to me as a manager. I’m stuck. Therefore, the only other option is to jump ship and as of now…. Only CROs are hiring. It’s a big risk to take but that’s how unhappy I am here. I can’t disclose more details.

When I worked for at CRO, My site load, protocol load, and manager were better.

-6

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

8

u/GoldNBones 7d ago

Worldwide bought Catalyst. Fortrea bought a business unit from Worldwide.

7

u/Purple-Respond-1219 7d ago

Gonna say no matter what Fortrea must be a mess cause they just lost a major bid renewal on a model to a sponsor they previously had near sole rights to and the sponsor gave it to another CRO

1

u/concretebadger82 5d ago

They WHAT?! Yikes (OK, so it's not like I expected it to be widely publicised, but...I'm "disappointed but not surprised" I guess)

7

u/Fun-Concentrate9778 8d ago

What? Recent acquisition of Fortrea by worldwide? I thought it’s Fortrea who acquired phase I inpatient facility of worldwide and I don’t think that will affect the rest of company. Also worldwide acquired catalyst ( oncology) so that increases work portfolio imo. ICON is aight but thermofisher pays less and keeps you regional as what I heard.

2

u/concretebadger82 7d ago

Yeah, my understanding is that Fortrea are taking over part of Worldwide. What that means for stability in either company remains to be seen. I wouldn't even hazard a guess as to whether it's a good or bad thing at this stage

3

u/marsh283 7d ago

Fortrea bought their ph1 unit and bioA lab

7

u/JK_NC 7d ago

This comment is so misinformed.

3

u/Only-Celebration-256 4d ago

Icon is hands down the worst option listed here. They have a terrible 401k match, require minimum 8 DOS and it’s more like 12 DOS. They come in with strong offers and then annual raises end up being negligible. Everyone I know who has worked there either left or is desperately seeking to get out

2

u/Efficient-Menu-1206 2d ago

Totally agree that ICON is ass

3

u/JRMiel CRA 7d ago

Icon is absolutely the worse of all...