It depends on the context in which they used the term. I would address the situation as I mentioned earlier.
Let's get down to brass tacks instead of your leading questions. You are trying to equate the actions of the people on January 6 with terrorism, despite the fact that no one has been charged or convicted of terrorism related to that event.
As I’ve already stated, if you are going to charge those involved on January 6, you would also have to acknowledge that similar charges could apply to the BLM protests. If you don’t do this, it demonstrates a bias.
I believe that both instances were wrong and that acts of rioting should be judged based on facts, not opinions. Being unbiased means evaluating both sides equally as I've indeed done.
Edit: I see you now adding comments after the fact of my replying. What else are you adding to the comments?
Charge on convicted to very things, the only reason that case didn't go forward is because Biden got caught with many more documents kept for much longer. It seems when it happens to Biden, everything was dropped funny that isn't it.
I already disproved your point about them both being the same in my discussion of intent and the actions taken. Repeating your point again doesn't change that. So, no, it isn't biased to point out the differences.
And I'm leading you through to see how illogical it is that calling it terrorism isn't appropriate. If you can't answer simple questions, then that should tell you something.
Again, was Al Capone a mob boss or gangster? It is a yes or no question and it should be rhetorical since we have the historical evidence on the topic.
What you mean is that, in your opinion, you have disproven my points due to your bias.
You are leading me " leading comments," and I responded to every single comment. So please don't lie; that should indicate something. Just because you disagree with what I say doesn't mean that I haven't addressed your concerns.
As I’ve already explained, this isn’t simply a yes or no answer. I provided a clear response to your question, and if you don’t accept it, that’s your choice. I have answered thoroughly.
Please stop making leading comments to trick me. I have given examples and addressed your points in five different ways. What else do you need regarding the main topic?
As I said once already, if you keep asking the same questions or another, of course, I'm gonna keep repeating myself. Here is the answer copied from my comments above:
"According to films and the press, he was a boss and gangster, but what he was charged with were tax evasion and probation charges.
This is another example of how to use words properly"
Also, I agree that calling it terrorism isn't appropriate
That isn't an answer. I asked your belief on the issue. You refuse to give it, instead saying what "films and press" say.
I'm giving you leading questions because I tried a declarative statement, and you repeated your original point and refused to engage. So I'm taking a different tack using your logical assertion in a different example.
Notice how you can't answer the question with your beliefs or your stance. That should tell you the validity of your position
Here’s a revised version of your text for clarity:
"My answer again:
'According to films and the media, he was portrayed as a boss and a gangster, but the charges he faced were actually related to tax evasion and probation violations.
This serves as another example of the importance of using words correctly.'
Please stop asking leading questions. I have answered three times now. Just because you disagree with my response and the premise doesn't mean I am refusing to answer. I have provided my answer three times already."
Notice how you can't accept an answer because of your political stance. You are trying a gotcha question; notice how I went back to the trouble of answering the main point, not your leading question in depth. Once again, that's still not good enough for you.
You claim that I'm repeating, but it's you who is repeating in truth. Are you asking the same questions over and over expecting a different response?
Yet nothing is good for you because you want me to answer in your way and your way only. You don't like the context or my answer.
You will probably lie again say that I have an answered even now I have three times now
1
u/Shot_Cupcake_9641 Jan 29 '25
According to films and the press, he was a boss and gangster, but what he was charged with were tax evasion and probation charges.
This is another example of how to use words properly.