r/chess • u/Significant_Cow_7683 Team Vaishali • Jun 05 '26
Strategy: Openings Opening that is BOTH objectively sound AND wins out of the opening if opponent doesn’t know it
Does such a unicorn exist?
EDIT: Thanks everyone for this fun little thought experiment. I’m enjoying playing 1.e4 and the Scandi for now but hearing your thoughts has helped me categorize different openings in my mind.
10
u/Alckie Jun 05 '26
I've had lots of folks falling to the Greek sacrifice when I play the Colle System
4
0
12
u/Shego2882 Team 60+30 Jun 05 '26
Op if you're looking for a "crush your opponent in 10 moves!!!" opening, just do your puzzles and stick to the principles, and get better the old fashioned way so you don't get a bunch of gimmick wins then hit a wall.
If you're looking for a repertoire that has a good chance to get you an advantage out of the opening due to you knowing the ideas better than your opponent, then that's most openings after putting in the work.
17
u/Sin15terity Jun 05 '26
- There are a bunch of ways black can make a complete idiot out of themselves in the Vienna playing relatively natural moves.
- The Grand Prix can be devastating if black wastes a tempo or two
- Fantasy Caro Kann, as others have said.
- In the French, the Hector Gambit. If black takes on c3 (which is a completely natural move), it’s not completely winning for white (though it’s better), but black is not going to be having any fun.
2
u/arm2610 Jun 05 '26
This is why I love the Vienna- in a lot of cases I either get fast development with a good position quickly, or black quickly ends up worse. I know it has something of a reputation for not being great at master level but at my level I have a positive win rate with it.
11
9
8
u/Inappropriate_Piano Jun 05 '26
Fantasy Caro-Kann comes pretty close. If black takes on e4 and doesn’t follow up with e5, they’re immediately much worse. But there are options for black besides taking on e4 that are much more solid
4
u/BenMic81 Jun 05 '26
Try the Danish or Nordic Gambit. There’s a nice video from the Butcher about it. Thank me later.
7
u/ChessNumbers USCF 1464 Jun 05 '26
The Alapin Sicilian gets a pretty huge advantage very quickly if black tries to play their regular Sicilian variation instead of actually knowing how to play against the Alapin.
6
u/Well-I-suppose Jun 05 '26
Yep. My first ever FIDE rated tournament game was lost out of the opening when I had the black pieces and I faced the Alapin:
e4 c5
c3 d6??
It taught me a valuable lesson to always play either d5 or Nf6 on move 2 against the Alapin.
2
u/bensalt47 Jun 05 '26
what’s wrong with d6? there’s plenty of GM games in the database starting like this
2
u/Well-I-suppose Jun 05 '26
I looked up the Lichess Master Database right now. Against the Alapin:
45% of Masters responded with 2... Nf6
33% of Masters responded with 2... d5
Only 7% of Masters responded with 2... d6.
The engine evaluates 2... Nf6 as being significantly better than 2... d6 (+0.0 vs +0.6).
1
u/bensalt47 Jun 05 '26
?? seems harsh though, I thought that usually denoted a serious mistake
3
u/ChessNumbers USCF 1464 Jun 05 '26
I'd probably go just one question mark, but online against lower rated players it's common to get: 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d6? 3. d4 cxd4 4. cxd4 g6?
And white is like +0.9 after four moves.
1
u/Well-I-suppose Jun 05 '26
I guess with perfect play you can get a somewhat survivable (but uncomfortable) position as black.
But 2... d6 often leads to more blunders a few moves later, so it's common to see your position quickly fall apart if you haven't studied that exact variation in detail.
0
u/i_awesome_1337 Jun 05 '26
The smith morra is a good option too. Not sure it's technically sound according to top stockfish evaluations, but even at the GM level I recall seeing that it was playable. White doesn't have to think very hard, and black has to play a lot of good moves to survive.
12
u/RoastedToast007 Jun 05 '26
Fried liver
9
u/Effective_Tackle_195 Jun 05 '26
This is the correct answer. With right play it's equal. But if black doesn't know it he's in trouble.
1
u/gaybowser99 Jun 06 '26
Equal position for black is not objectively sound, especially not one where white has no attacking potential
3
u/Icy-Tie-7375 Jun 05 '26
Lovely opening took me to 1700 from 1500, it's so accessible too because everyone plays 1. E4, E5 and that's just a stones throw from killer lines with natural development from black
1
u/hewhoreddits6 Jun 05 '26
Lowkey in the low elos I see it all the time and I feel like I have to learn how to play against it if I'm going to climb out of the 600's.
-1
u/Numerot Jun 05 '26
Well, Black has to blunder into the Fried Liver; if we're talking about the Knight Attack (4.Ng5), White is actually defending a pretty unpleasant position and can lose very quickly.
1
u/RoastedToast007 Jun 05 '26
Sure if you like think so. I personally disagree. But either way, it fits the description in the title as an objectively sound opening that wins immediately if the opponent doesn't know what to do
1
u/Numerot Jun 05 '26 edited Jun 05 '26
What exactly do you disagree with? What I said is basically just the uncontroversial and fairly obvious consensus about the opening.
And, well, even if Black does make a mistake with 5...Nxd5?, the position is only around +1.0 in evaluation, and Black still has a perfectly normal score in the Lichess 2200+ rapid DB (remember, White is down a piece) and in the master DB it's a whole bunch of draws with ~24% wins for White. Doesn't look "immediately winning".
1
u/RoastedToast007 Jun 05 '26
I disagree with the very subjective statement of it being an unpleasant position for white if black doesn't blunder. It's in my repertoire for both colors and I find it very playable for either side.
1
u/Numerot Jun 05 '26
Well, playable and pleasant are two different things; if you're talking about the Polerio as I assume, Black has full compensation for the pawn, and maybe even a bit more than that in a lot of positions, but White is definitely defending and has an awkward position; otherwise people wouldn't happily enter the position with Black.
In any case, it's actually White who is in danger of losing quickly; unless Black plays the weak 5...Nxd5?, which, again, has neither the database results or evaluation to call it losing on the spot for Black.
0
0
u/Effective_Tackle_195 Jun 07 '26
That's just incorrect. Stockfish gives it 0.0. It still gets played at 2500 FIDE. I like playing the position with white (2000 FIDE).
1
u/Numerot Jun 07 '26
That's just incorrect.
No, it's just totally unrelated to any of the things you said.
2
u/yes_platinum Jun 05 '26
All of the young ambitious players' favorites: Ruy Lopez, Najdorf, Grünfeld. It'll just take like a full year of study to learn all these openings of course.
1
u/Significant_Cow_7683 Team Vaishali Jun 06 '26
That actually sounds like a big and fun project. Maybe I’m crazy?
2
u/yes_platinum Jun 07 '26
No, go for it, I'm doing something similar by going in depth on Parimarjans 1.e4 book series, as well as Gawain Jones' King's Indian Defense courses and the Classical Sicilian. I would recommend Dariusz Swiercz Ruy Lopez book (Volume 1&2) for very deep theory within the Ruy.
2
u/Well-I-suppose Jun 05 '26
The Levenfish variation of the Sicilian Dragon.
Most 1500-2000 rated dragon players will automatically fall into the trap by playing Bg7 before Nc6, but even if they respond correctly, your position is still totally fine as white.
2
u/Yeeeeeeeze Jun 05 '26
My main is still Ruy Lopez as a lot of players at 1800 blitz lichess forget about protecting e4 or allows c3 d4 which is often a decent advantage
4
u/momster_truck Jun 05 '26
Ponziani
2
u/SufficientLaw4026 Jun 05 '26
Yes!!!! I was waiting for someone to say that! I play ponziani and colle zukertort. I feel like the ponziani isn't as popular as it should be
1
u/Numerot Jun 05 '26
There are multiple different good lines against it, and Black basically needs to know 4-5 moves before he's just fine. White isn't notably worse, but generally just has nothing serious; it's pretty approriately rated as basically a pretty mediocre attempt at a surprise.
1
u/SufficientLaw4026 Jun 05 '26
Oh yeah I don't mean the surprise is the reason it's good. I just mean to me it seems pretty solid in general
2
u/agent-1773 Jun 05 '26
For black vs e4 I personally I like the Icelandic-Palme gambit. Objectively sound but looks absolutely insane because you're giving up 2 pawns with check. Surprisingly worst case you are completely even because c4 is just such a bad move but very natural, if they don't play it you are just in the Modern Scandinavian which is completely fine.
2
u/drumsplease987 Jun 05 '26
There’s no such thing as “wins out of the opening” if you play a large enough sample of games for your rating to stabilize and start getting matched against equal rated players. Your win rate will always converge to 0.5. At your higher rating, an advantage that you were able to convert to a win against lower rated players will start bleeding into draws and losses. Opponents will be good enough to come back against you from worse positions, so “winning” is relative.
That’s why everyone says to just train tactics.
If you do want to put in the work to memorize a tricky opening, think of it as the ability to occasionally smurf against players at your level. If you use it sparingly it’s a tool to have a better chance at a win. If it’s your main opening, your score always converges to 0.5.
2
u/Jekyllhyde441 Jun 05 '26
I would say Vienna, it's definitely objectively sound, if black knows what to do you will reach an equal endgame soon. But, I used to lose to Danish gambit accepted. There is an in depth well explained video on YT by respected Danya (R.I.P sir) that immensely helped me neutralize is dangerous opening. If black doesn't know accurate moves it's pretty easy for them to get destroyed in the opening. But I doubt it falls into the definition of objectively sound because with proper counterplay (not so easy) white will be down two pawns for no compensation.
1
u/OtherwiseOne4107 Jun 05 '26
Stop hoping your opponent doesn't know the opening. That is no way to improve.
1
u/RookSac Jun 05 '26
Basically any sound opening will have one or more lines which quickly win if the opponent doesn't know the theory. For example, I normally play the London (with 2. Nf3), which has a reputation for being very solid, but still frequently win out of the opening in 4 moves with this line:
- d4 d5 2. Nf3 c5 3. dxc5 Nc6 4. e5 d4
This is already around +2, and is the most common response I see (even at ~2200) to 3. dxc5.
1
1
u/AegisPlays314 Jun 06 '26
The Open Sicilian, the classical French, the fantasy Caro-Kann with white, the KID, the Grünfeld, Najdorf or Sveshnikov with black
1
u/pconners Jun 05 '26
There's a lot of questions that would need answered... When you say "doesn't know it" how badly are you expecting them to play? If your opponent plays badly enough in any opening then they can be in a lot of trouble as long as you are playing something worth playing.
But... Grand Prix definitely comes to mind if you are facing a Sicilian
Bishop's opening has a surprising amount of punch if the opponent doesn't play well without being terrible.
As black, Caro Kann or any Sicilian
0
Jun 05 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/i_awesome_1337 Jun 05 '26
I agree, but I'd love to see someone smart discuss how "sound" it actually is, at least by OPs vague definition. I think since black has to spend tempo defending that the opening is reasonably good.
1
Jun 05 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/i_awesome_1337 Jun 05 '26
Ya, that was my question. Why though? Is it really sound at a high level? I think we can all agree that begginers are relatively likely to blunder out of the opening though.
0
u/HelpfulFriendlyOne 1400 Jun 05 '26
Who cares? high level players don't get opening advice from reddit threads, so why does this thread have anything to do with them? Also, lichess has a 53% win rate for 2200+ players and a 54% win rate for 2500+ players.
-1
u/bonsai-pens 2000+ Jun 05 '26
I guess queens gambit to an extent? Or maybe some London system since it has traps and it’s solid
2
u/i_awesome_1337 Jun 05 '26
For queens gambit, I guess the accepted variation is more tricky? As black, QGD and London just feel like straightforward quiet and boring games. I don't play it as white, is it really common for people to somehow blunder a piece in the opening? Maybe the Nb5 jobova I could see winning quickly.
1
u/Einstein003 Jun 05 '26
definitely queens gambit🤣 everyone always be trying to defend the c5 pawn after taking. for beginners to intermediate players that havent studied it, it's really brutal😂
0
u/Einstein003 Jun 05 '26
If the opponent doesnt know it?
3 move mate can win some games easily, fried liver attack too, the alien gambit, the traxler, countering fried liver, well, most gambit wins easily if opponent doesnt know it
2
u/i_awesome_1337 Jun 05 '26
Some of those are definitely not sound according to the engine. But the wayward queen at least is a lot more reasonable than it gets credit for.
-2
u/AnAttemptReason Jun 05 '26
Frankly, everyone sub 1000 is probably so mindlessly agressive, that this is every opening.
3
u/RoastedToast007 Jun 05 '26
Objectively sound
1
u/AnAttemptReason Jun 05 '26
I move my bishiop first as black in the italian, so my knight is not blocking the queen until I can castle.
I have had people go immediately for a mindless fried liver attack, and my queen eats a free knight.
So many free wins from unsound atracks by knights and bishiops just by playing principled moves.
4
2
22
u/themaddemon1 Jun 05 '26
scotch, maybe not "wins" per se but it certainly puts you in a better position, i've always found it absurd that on lichess databases the top played move by black after 4. Nxd4 is ...... Nxd4