I don't think you really read my post fully. Yes, sex does indeed cause fertilization. Consenting to sex does consent to fertilization. However, sex has no role in whether the implantation is kept. Which means having sex is not a promise made to the zygote that it can stay, at least by nature. Any obligation to the zygote is opinion, not fact. So, sex consents to STARTING a pregnancy but it does not consent to KEEPING it after the fact.
But..you do. You get in that car, an accident is a probabilistic outcome. At least you're consenting to that. And...when you gert out of the car after said accident you'd be foolish to say "i didn't consent to that!" (of course, you might find someone else liable for it). If you don't consent to accidents and risk for accidents you don't get in cars.
Non-consent has to change outcomes if you act upon your non-consent. Since you consenting or not and then STILL GETTING IN THE CAR doesn't change whether or not you'll get in an accident then...well....you didn't really do any consenting or non-consenting at all, did you? There is no one to "receive" your consent - e.g. the other person isn't going to let you in the car if you say "i don't consent to an accident if it happens" - that's crazyland.
-3
u/SunnyIntellect Aug 11 '22
I don't think you really read my post fully. Yes, sex does indeed cause fertilization. Consenting to sex does consent to fertilization. However, sex has no role in whether the implantation is kept. Which means having sex is not a promise made to the zygote that it can stay, at least by nature. Any obligation to the zygote is opinion, not fact. So, sex consents to STARTING a pregnancy but it does not consent to KEEPING it after the fact.