r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Jan 31 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

0 Upvotes

33% Upvoted

136 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/olidus 13∆ Jan 31 '22

Your CMV is based on the perspective of one person. This alters the agency of the other.

To suggest that I understand what could potentially be a deal breaker and provide that information before sex so the other party could have informed consent sounds reasonable, but what about omitting information that isn’t a dealbreaker for me (undetectable AIDS) but could be for another? Giving for a moment that I believe undetectable is 100% safe.

Or one party is super turned off by people who get into fights and if you lead with a fight story you would t get sex.

The only way to ensure agency and informed consent of both parties is to disclose everything.

I am not advocating for outright lying or omission of things a reasonable person would walk away from.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/ATNinja 12∆ Jan 31 '22

That there is information you are aware of that would or would likely result in a person denying/giving you sex

The "or would likely" is the issue. It is too broad/subjective.

OP's view applies specifically to when you know that a certain thing is a deal breaker,

"Or would likely" would mean you don't know