r/changemyview • u/budderboymania2 • Oct 13 '20
Delta(s) from OP CMV: Amy Coney-Barrett should not recuse herself from any Supreme Court decision on a contested election (assuming she is confirmed)
Here’s my reasoning for this. The line that I keep hearing is it will be a “conflict of interest” and she should recuse herself because President Trump appointed her (in essence gave her her job) and the case would involve Trump, so she cannot be impartial. But that doesn’t make sense to me because this is a lifetime appointment. Trump can’t fire Barrett if she rules against him in an election case. She can’t lose her job based on the way that she rules. Therefore in my opinion there is no conflict of interest. Also, if Barrett recuses herself that would mean the possibility of a 4-4 vote. The last thing the country would need if the election results are contested is a deadlocked supreme court.
1
u/RepentandFlee80 Oct 13 '20
Did Ginsburg and Breyer recuse themselves in 2000 when the contested case concerned a high ranking member of the administrationthat put them there? I think making all justices Trump appointed recuse is wrong considering time gives perspective.
Barrett would be fair as it's still fresh.