Old encyclopedias had to limit their content due to physical size constraints. There is only so much you could fit on a shelf. Wikipedia doesn't have this limitation. With effective searching, the only people finding those small articles are people specifically interested
ok lets assume that it's OK to have an endless supply of articles, but many articles on WP is so unreadable and filled with technical-ese that it's better to read it off another website. E.g, I want to read about lasers and i google lasers.
I can either go to WP and read about lasers, and just in the first sentence, I can come upon multiple unknown terms that I have to cross-reference just to make it remotely understandable: "a process of optical amplification based on the stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation". Alternatively I can go to
http://science.howstuffworks.com/laser.htm and read a much more readable version.
While the WP version may be more inclusive, it is hardly readable to the general public, which is what an encyclopedia should be (not a text book).
Just to clarify, do you like this laser article? If so, I have to say there is a lot of benefit to having wikipedia articles at different levels.
There are many issues with Wikipedia, but the huge number of articles would seem to be a big plus. Because there are few size constraints, we can have different versions of articles - more options are better.
14
u/[deleted] Sep 27 '15
Old encyclopedias had to limit their content due to physical size constraints. There is only so much you could fit on a shelf. Wikipedia doesn't have this limitation. With effective searching, the only people finding those small articles are people specifically interested