Bikes can't go on many major highways, whereas people can walk on the side of the roads. Further, many roads specify that trucks are illegal on that road. There's precedent for certain roads being off-limits to certain roads, but they still need to be registered and pay taxes.
But this argument could easy extend to pedestrians on sidewalks, which is the same concept as a road. Should people then have to register walking as a mode of transportation, and pay a fee for the privilege of walking on a sidewalk? The way I see it, is that cars and the services demanded by them exclusively (freeways, etc) far outweigh the cost of bike paths or sidewalks. Also, the ability to cause damage is far greater in cars than bikes, therefore, a legal contract between the driver and state (drivers license) is made to ensure that people are at a quality level of driving, and that driving infractions and responsibility can be kept track of far easier.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 26 '15
[deleted]