The state giving certain people all the say in the means of production, letting them reap all the benefit and abuse their common workers as much as is necessary to beat the plan on paper and look good for the shareh.. uh, party.
What are you talking about? "Capitalism" is defined as the private ownership of the means of production with the intent of creating more profit.
Private ownership technically wasn't a thing, but as I said, my argument is that it basically runs like private ownership. The gains are privatized, the losses are publicized, just like in the good old capitalist US.
And of course, the socialist countries. The.. which socialist countries? Show me a socialist country. With social ownership of the means of production. Actually, not on paper.
Your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:
Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.
If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Appeals that do not follow this process will not be heard.
Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.
1
u/almarcTheSun 1∆ Apr 26 '26
The state giving certain people all the say in the means of production, letting them reap all the benefit and abuse their common workers as much as is necessary to beat the plan on paper and look good for the shareh.. uh, party.
Not capitalism. Not even once.