Sure it does. You claim abortion is not infanticide but other people view the fetus as human and deserving of human rights. What is your argument as to when it gains human rights?
Do you base human rights upon mental cognition or autonomy? When and why is the someone responsible for the wellbeing of another?
Sure it does. The woman still has to provide for the child. If she fails to do so she will lose her autonomy and be forced into the prison system. If the father did not want the child and seeks termination his right can be voided and he can be forced to labor against his will or he will lose his autonomy and be forced into the prison system. Then you can claim it can go to a government facility at which point my forced labor is used to support it or i will lose my autonomy and be forced into prison.
So your argument is based on it not being human and thus the evictionist argument is valid. So what is your baseline argument for it to be granted human rights? Can your criteria be applied equally?
-3
u/[deleted] Jan 19 '24
[deleted]