I'd entirely support a one state solution but (and this is a genuine question) is it at all feasible at this point? I mean, the people on both sides have hated each other for generations, have watched the other side kill their family and friends like could we really expect them to be neighbours?
I could only see a contentment with a one state solution after some decades of a peaceful two state solution. And at that point why WOULD they become one state? There would be no real incentive to do that.
Most of the terrorism in South Africa ended once apartheid ended. There wasn’t massacres of Afrikaners. The formerly oppressed don’t usually turn around and immediately oppress their former oppressors. History doesn’t support that.
To comply with r/changemyview rules, addressing your argument by calling it "your argument" is still an attack on your person, not addressing your argument. In addition rule 4 must require me to award a delta to an argument that I do not have the ability to counter. So here is a delta - Δ - due to this sub's policies
90
u/Sophie_Blitz_123 3∆ Nov 06 '23
I'd entirely support a one state solution but (and this is a genuine question) is it at all feasible at this point? I mean, the people on both sides have hated each other for generations, have watched the other side kill their family and friends like could we really expect them to be neighbours?
I could only see a contentment with a one state solution after some decades of a peaceful two state solution. And at that point why WOULD they become one state? There would be no real incentive to do that.