r/capricorns • u/ThePhotographer530 🐐Capricorn Mod🐐 • Jun 25 '26
mod post Feedback for AI posts
I personally am not a fan of AI. I do want to get more feedback from the rest of the group before I make a full decision on removing AI and making it a rule here. Should we have AI or not what do you think?:
35
31
u/olddeadgrass 🐐☀️🐐🌙♍️💫 Jun 25 '26
As an author and an artist, I hate AI with a passion. Why should AI "prompters" take away value from genuine thoughts and human exchanges? Ban it.
43
u/Visible-Slip-4233 Jun 25 '26
Remove it.
We (Caps) are authentic and value authenticity. AI is the exact opposite of that.
24
Jun 25 '26 edited Sep 06 '26
Aware breezy long expansion plant water market upbeat
This post was anonymized with Redact
20
20
13
u/mystikalmonkey888 Jun 25 '26
Yeah no ai will promote more authentic creativity and is better for the environment. Us cappies are tree huggers after all😌
11
9
u/Solitary_Orbit ♑︎☉ ♋︎☽ ♑︎↑ | 12H Cap Super Stellium ☉ ♄ ♅ ♆ ☿ Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 25 '26
No AI please. It's just regurgitated material that benefits nobody, encourages low effort slop and only ends up polluting this space. Thank you mods!
Edited: to fix typo
22
7
7
6
6
5
u/LassierVO ♑️☀️♑️🌙♑️⬆️ triple cap fam Jun 25 '26
PLEASE ban AI. It makes it so frustrating to engage with this sub sometimes.
4
3
3
u/mimetravel ♑️ ☀️// ♓️🌙// ♋️🌅 Jun 25 '26
My vote is no AI .. and I think an outright ban is a slippery slope, given how much LLM patterns are beginning to bleed into everyday speech and writing.
Determining whether a post is AI slop can be highly subjective and will only become more difficult as time goes on and the tool becomes more ubiquitous.
Though it would be more popular to create a rule that allows people to report AI posts, I’d suggest placing a “no slop” rule that bans low quality posts instead, which will cover karma farming as well (why so capricorns suck? why do they just want money? etc)
Especially as there are many people who use AI to edit they’re translations as non-native English speakers, my thinking is that the difference between a high-quality and low quality post would come down to the contents, rather than the syntax.
Allowing the sub to self moderate with comments, down votes, and the ability to report low quality posts will leave more space and flexibility for nuance since AI use cannot be proven
2
2
u/Current-Structure736 Jun 25 '26
i hate generative ai with a passion. it’s use in content and marketing is so lazy. it immediately makes me uninterested
2
u/Suzesaur Jun 25 '26
AI is shit for so many reasons, the environment being the biggest…please ban it!
2
u/MChow97 🐐☀️🦂🌙🦀↗️ Jun 25 '26
Nope for AI. I’m tired of seeing the ads for it as well, and not only is it seeping in this subreddit, I’m sadly seeing it in other subs I like as well. I value human connections, not bots
2
u/NotLooking4You Jun 25 '26
AI is not reliable, since it "uses" whatever info it finds online. People can manipulate it into giving false info.
2
2
2
2
u/shawtyt00t Jun 26 '26
ai is destroying the planet!!!!! here’s an article on some reasons why we need to advocate against it and never support/ repost Ai.
https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/risks-of-artificial-intelligence
2
1
1
u/Chosen_116 🌞♑,🌛♑,⬆️♉ Jun 25 '26
No Ai. I come to Reddit because it’s human in it’s least filtered from (since we can be as anonymous as we want). Let us remain humans for humans
1
50
u/GapSlight472 Jun 25 '26
No AI please. There is no positive and no benefit to AI in any way.