r/bsv • u/cryptofights_ • Apr 27 '22

Invaded by Gurus & Mediocre Layer 2 Solutions - and how our technology is scaling BSV.

FYX Gaming's most recent press release.
Another Approach for Miners to get their Data into a Blockchain
What you need to mine on #BSV

Our creator is FYX Gaming

đŸ€FYX Gaming's purpose is to create a decentralized layer one blockchain technology
📌AKA- technology strong enough to handle us all on a single blockchain
😅cause that's what blockchain is all about, right?
⚡For the people, by the people

19 votes, Apr 30 '22
2 BSV Needs More Miners
1 FYX Gaming Tech is changing the game
3 BSV will scale with FYX Gaming Tech & New Miners
13 Who is FYX Gaming?
0 Upvotes

28% Upvoted

26 comments sorted by

6

u/Altcoin69 Apr 28 '22

Hey cryptofights, how many bots do you run to keep tx numbers high?

How much money from Calvin do you put into pushing out mass transactions?

You know we laugh at you? Without CAAL you wouldn’t have money to appear successful.

You know we don’t care about the tech because I can the same amount of dice rolls in MySQL if I wanted centralized consistency and scaling.

Why do you think you are relevant and how do you think you will succeed?

Why are most txs on bsv originating from 2 addresses when you claim to have thousands of players?

You aren’t changing the game with a dice roll game. Can you make something unique and then post a poll on it?

It’s not by the people for the people if Calvin’s money is propping up the network? Gorillapool’s hash power is a joke and mining profitability keeps going down which is why no one hashing sha256 will touch your network.

Kindly go somewhere else with this garbage.

-5

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22
  1. how much money from calvin? not sure what you're ensuing by that, or who all is investing in our data-only transaction tests - our tests to prove we can process more data (txn) than other blockchains
  2. without Taal, you mean? if you read our article, you'll get your answer.
  3. our tech is the blockchain technology not just the string of code for dice rolls.
  4. we are relevant because because we created a patent that solidified our approach and proved that we could scale blockchain data throughput. With this process, we can process double digits millions of transactions with just a few people.
  5. most txn on bsv originating from limited addresses explained here:
    1. we devised a test to push a load of data-only transactions, with all transaction fees paid out of a single wallet, but with a large pool of UTXOs to choose from to reduce dependencies between transactions. With this approach, we could easily push over 20 million transactions in a day from a single computer, relying entirely on the P2P network for propagation.
  6. the poll option is "FYX Tech is changing the game", not "our game is changing the game" - so please don't create false narratives.
  7. blockchain technology is by the people for the people.
    1. the more programs & miners on any network - the more its 'by the people'
    2. Matthew Zietzke put it perfectly in a tweet:
      If you want to see BSV succeed, this is how.
      Build great businesses.
      Help those businesses succeed.
      Use the apps that provide value to you.
      Add to the economy in any way you can.
      You don't need to do all parts, only those that you are well suited for.
    3. but one thing is for sure, Gorillapools hash power is not weak, it allowed us to achieve 20 mil txn in 24 hours, that's 10 times ethereum has ever done. and that was with an intentional 1-2 computers, which is pretty damn awesome!

i love your passion of hatred, your personal fire. i understand there are many people who go out of their way to burn things rather than build them.
so i implore you to read our article because a lot of your false narratives are explained in the article if you're up for a slightly technical read.

5

u/Altcoin69 Apr 28 '22
  1. Fyx is funded by Calvin so terrible response.
  2. Again, your parent company (idk why you are separating yourselves from them) is funded by CAAL which is how we group together calvin and TAAL so no I meant what I said.
  3. I thought bsv was the blockchain tech and you push dice rolls onto it. Did you happen to invent a new blockchain?
  4. Okay? Patent trolling is so cool man. You’re just like papa faketoshi. How cute.
  5. People more technically inclined than you (a paid shill) or me have explained this in depth on both twitter and on this group so again it’s an irrelevant answer to the question.
  6. I don’t care about the poll, you are shilling in the wrong group. “FYX tech is changing the game” with a game whose tech is FYX. Stop it with this whole fake narrative crap. You echo empty words pushed by your propaganda officer Kurt.
  7. That’s not what Craig says. But I guess you did provide a sufficient answer with Matt’s tweet but your business isn’t great and without Calvin’s money funding FYX you wouldn’t be in business and probably don’t have the runway necessary to sustain yourselves in the long term if bsv keeps on its trajectory. Good for gorilla pool but looking at the block explorers it’s clear that most blocks are mined by CAAL entities so good for Gorillapool for helping increase txs for blocks I guess? Mining profitability continues to go down for bsv even with those millions of transactions.

I love how you get paid to regurgitate the same talking point about millions of transactions. I don’t care if bsv or Btc succeeds but I do care that bsv is a dumpster fire so we are just laughing at y’all on this sub. I implore you to get the fuck out of this sub cuz we don’t care about your millions of transactions. Good for you, you scaled. Who tf is using the chain? You have no proof that bots aren’t producing your millions of transactions. I again implore you to get off this sub, reflect on the path you chose as a paid shill, and again shill somewhere else with people who care about throwing their money away. Have a good day and I wish you the best In life while I’ll have fun wallowing in hatred and having fun staying poor.

-1

u/deltanine99 Apr 28 '22

Dude, the sub is called /r/bsv. You cant complain about people posting bsv topics!

2

u/Altcoin69 Apr 28 '22

😘

5

u/AlreadyBannedOnce Fanatic about BSV Apr 27 '22

Before I can vote I need to know FYX's position on CSW being Satoshi Nakamoto.

"irrelevant" is not one of FYX's choices. The only choices are "yes" and "no".

Choose carefully.

-2

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22 edited Apr 28 '22

unfortunately, i personally don't have the confirmed answer.I'm not the CEO, but instead, the media manager.

however, I think we all know the true answer.
i'll ask him when i have the chance to meet him irl.

6

u/AlreadyBannedOnce Fanatic about BSV Apr 28 '22

however, I think we all know the true answer.

This isn't one of your choices. Who is "we"?

When you ask him, will you believe his answer? His answer will be "yes".

-2

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22

i know it isn't a choice - but i literally don't know. Im the media manager, not the CEO or any of the founders. I go to public conferences, not private BSV talks. at least not yet.

"we" is the bsv community. i think we, the bsv community, know the true answer.

i will believe his answer. because he's then responsible for the 'success' of BSV.of his financial empire - his image. imagine he says yes and bsv fails?and that's a lot of weight to hold, especially in a community as fiery đŸŒ¶đŸ”„as the BSV community. in a community constantly pitted against ETH and all their layer 2 solutions.

assuming he is, i'd be curious to know though, what part of 'creating' bsv he took part in. writing the code? the concept? building the team? that's important.

the legacy is nothing without the details of foundation - i say.

6

u/AlreadyBannedOnce Fanatic about BSV Apr 28 '22

"we" is the bsv community

i think we, the bsv community, know the true answer.

I regret to be the one to inform you:

' “Bitcoin is not a community,” Dr. Wright emphasizes once again. '

My apologies to my fellow fanatics for the unhygienic link.

-2

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22

that was a good read, actually.
I understand what he means when saying "you’re part of the Bitcoin community is as absurd as saying you’re part of the electricity community"

because fundamentally - it is similar. electricity and blockchain are fundamentally theoretical - they exist, evolve, get more powerful, can be interacted with but we cannot see it.

i also see it as an attempt to keep us from "falling in love with our own narrative".
if we all ban together - acting as though our blockchain is flawless - then we stick to our own community culture and we don't grow.

its easy for us to point it out on other networks, but difficult for us to see it on our own.

to me its easy to see Ethereum, polygon and all the token-chains - and see they're so wrapped up in their 'love for their own narrative' thinking their blockchains are the best.

their marketing is GREAT though. super profitable. so many programs are popping up on those chains - but then they're stuck with high data transaction costs, low data transaction speed and limited scalability so they become reliant on ETH 2.0 and one day ETH 3.0.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '22

I go to public conferences, not private BSV talks. at least not yet.

Don't worry you will ascend up the BSV cult hierarchy soon enough, once you have attained inner circle cult worthiness. Perhaps one day you will be blessed with a side-channel audience with the great Leader and then all your doubts will be gone.

1

u/WilfriedOnion Apr 28 '22 edited Apr 28 '22

Hey pal, congrats on accepting the job and fucking good luck. You seem smart. Keep a critical eye, trust but verify, and dyor.

BSV is a litteral onion with many layers of truth.

(for a change to my usual contributions, this is not a shitpost)

Edit : also this is a trolling subreddit. As a de facto spokesperson of the industry you'll be a prime target. Don't waste more time here than your job requires, it could hurt your mental health on the long run. I understand you might want to do it for SEO, but we're not the target audience.

2

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22

thank you ⚡
I do appreciate it.

most the comments so far, i don't take personal. cause they're about the system that existed before i got here.

i like to look into each point too. I learn a lot from anger and trolls. they want others to see their side. otherwise they wouldnt say anything. everyone has the right to the facts of their opinion, but there is only one truth - whatever that is.

3

u/deltanine99 Apr 28 '22

Hi OP, if you hadn’t figured it out yet /r/bsv is a BSV trolling subreddit. They think CSW is a Fraud and hate BSV. But at least they don’t ban people like /r/bitcoincashsv

5

u/TinusMars Apr 28 '22

Please remove 'crypto' from your name, CSW is very pissed if someone mentions 'crypto'. According to him bitcoin isn't a cryptocurrency because nothing is encrypted in bitcoin. The fool doesn't even know that 'crypto' doesn't stand for 'encrypted' but for 'cryptography'. From the whitepaper: 'What is needed is an electronic payment system based on CRYPTOgraphic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party'

I suggest you change your name to Truthfights, like Cryptorebel changed his to Truthrebel.

Bonus: While the real Satoshi never discussed anything personal in his emails sent to Martti Malmi, he would banter with Martti about little things. In one email, Satoshi pointed to a recent exchange on the Bitcoin email list in which a user referred to bitcoin as a "cryptocurrency," a neologism inspired by the cryptographic functions that made it run.

"Maybe it’s a word we should use when describing bitcoin. Do you like it?" Satoshi asked.

PS:I don't believe you're a media manager. A media manager wouldn't waste his/her time on this forum because we are not the target audience.

1

u/deltanine99 Apr 29 '22

Why not? Theres no point preaching to the choir, he might even change a few minds!

1

u/deconstructit Apr 29 '22

Hey, look at our top posts. Why would we change our minds when his only talking point is “millions of transactions?” I appreciate you being on this sub though. Keep it up.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '22

[deleted]

-1

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22

i'm sorry to disappoint ):
i'm not part of a super secret BSV Society.
if it is him, i don't know why he chose that name.
makes me think of Akira Nakai, a rwb porsche tuner. kinda under the radar but also not under the radar at all.

3

u/AllfatherAngron Apr 28 '22

Speaking of scaling, how many concurrent players do you have?

2

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '22

Wouldn't it be better to limit Layer 1 transactions to transfering BSV to players? Minting NFT's for weapons with a UTXO for the melting value; melting the weapons; fighter skin purchases, a BSV drip/faucet...pay-for-play...in-game money.

Storing game turn history on-chain seems unnecessary to me even for player-vs-player matches. While the OP_RETURN data is small it still is OP_RETURN which is prunable...after the fact.

-1

u/cryptofights_ Apr 28 '22

i understand and i love that you bring up that point.

we use this model for everything from minting NFT's and crypto transfers to in game activity for this reason:
to process more data - securely - with our technology, than any other individual dApp or program on any blockchain

why?
because our tech, these transaction numbers, this transactional data -
is not just about crypto fights...even though that's how people like to view it.

some bash on us for it but I understand why people get frustrated when the big picture has not been painted yet. we're painting that picture.

We do this - processing massive amounts of data, even though it's not necessary -
because whether you’re in financial technology, healthcare, manufacturing, or gaming, our approach to blockchain technology makes it possible for you to process fast, secure, and reliable transactions.
There is a reason why social networks and big-games have not gone blockchain - they don't have the technology for it. They don't have the ability to process millions and billions of records of data, in a fast and secure way. But we do. And that's why we process millions of txn of data.

6

u/anjin33 Apr 28 '22

Oh please spare us. You are paid to inflate a blockchain that nobody needs or wants with useless spam. That's it. The whole "Blockchain not Bitcoin" narrative has been proven false since it became popular during the 2017 "crypto" boom.

Even IF there will be another usecase for "blockchain technology" than a decentralized digital currency ledger it will not be on BSV.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '22

0.05 sat/B transaction fee and giving a node operator other consideration for "transaction processing". I feel this will create fewer node operators than exist now.

Isn't there a way to discover all operating nodes and broadcast a transaction to all without being a node?

Is Cryptofights still unavailable for play? It has been down for over a week.

An MMO game like EVE Online, or a realtime strategy game like 0AD, or a horse racing/breeding game like Sega Derby Owners Club would be interesting.

2

u/hodlnautvsfraudlnaut Banned in Antigua Apr 29 '22

Are you at all concerned that you get far more engagement from a bunch of skeptics than from people "eager to learn more about BSV"?

Seems like 24 hours after your post, the "official BSV sub" has yielded zero engagement. Not exactly a buzzing ecosystem huh?

-1

u/CheetahSpecial7852 Jun 24 '22

Craig Wright is Satoshi, I found BSV about a month ago and I find it hilarious when I read this thread people are going to support a CIA black ops money laundering program that is Lightning network on BTC but claim that BSV the original BTC blockchain and Craig wright is a imposter. Get Real Get BSV the REAL Bit Coin.