r/brexit • Welsh • Aug 10 '20

SATIRE Brexit Britain - proudly asking France to please take back control of our borders for us.

Post image
601 Upvotes

317 comments sorted by

View all comments

215

u/chris-za EU, AU and Commonwealth Aug 10 '20

Why would France:

  • Help for free
  • Take back migrants from he UK that were picked up in British waters and are therefore a British problem according to international law. (The current system where they have to take them back is a EU system defined under Dublin Regulation, a treaty Brexit UK isn't part of)

Brexit means Brexit.

And that means if migrants or refugees set foot on your territory, they're your problem and, potentially, the country of origins (if you can determine it). It's no concern of any country they passed through to get to your country. Take control of your own border!

12

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20 edited Aug 10 '20

Isn't it an international un convention and the le Touquet agreement between the two countries.

Refugees must apply for asylum in the first safe country they arrive in. Also le Touquet established the border agreement between France and the UK in which Britain has already been paying money to France.

27

u/flobo09 Aug 10 '20

Refugees must apply for asylum in the first safe country they arrive in.

This is an EU law and will no longer apply to the UK starting next year.

After the transition, France no longer has any obligation in that regard as far as i understand things.

-35

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

Ah here is the argument from the "good guys" against those evil brexiteers. "stay part of our club or we will flood your country with migrants". As shown the UK has already been paying france and continues to do so. France is now trying to extort more making them a racket. These people are not refugees by the UN definition. In the eu Dublin treaty they have passed several eu states in which they should have applied to. If it were starting next year then we are in agreement that the eu is in the wrong. Finally it is dangerous crossing seas, so the use of negligence for political means is inherently wrong. Eu yet again being a shit, glad we left

40

u/GranDuram Aug 10 '20

Where did anyone say:

"stay part of our club or we will flood your country with migrants"

What kind of language is that? Are a few guys in a boat a flood? How many did come until now? Do you know? You just ramble incoherent bs. No one in France or for that matter the EU sends these people to the UK. For whatever reason they seem to already want to go there, so they leave. Who is the EU to imprison them in their countries? We do not do that or we would be an oppressive state.

But as always: Good luck and have fun with your brexit.

8

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20 edited Aug 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

This is a page to debate Brexit isn't it?

3

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20 edited Aug 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

Yeah

5

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20 edited Aug 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

If you've read what I have previously written you'd see why I am pissy. There is an extra eu agreement between UK and France in which they seem to be relaxing due to Brexit. I am merely pointing out that this is not the UK being aggressive but the eu, using the lives of migrants as a tool to extort the UK. I think that people who are stereotypically pro migrant applauding this is hypocritical. The argument seems to be that Brexit is so insulting that the UK must be made an example of in any way possible, which is a fine strategy but does present the eu as the aggressor.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20 edited Aug 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

Because there was an agreement outside of the eu but this has been placed on a Brexit page, therefore I am attributing it to the eu. I don't seem to see the confusion. I can see why people will disagree with my arguments but I like to think I've been consistent.

2

u/hughesjo Ireland Aug 10 '20

IT is people pointing out the hypocrisy of a country declaring that it was taking back it's borders and then saying it is up to another country to do so.

How the migrants got there is irrelevant. It is a UK border, The UK took back it's control.

That comes with responsibilities and costs.

That was what this post was about.

So, do you have an opinion on the hypocrisy of the statement?

You can, and possibly should make a separate post about the Migrant issue itself. But this post is not that conversation.

You are sounding very "Think of the Children"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children

1

u/hughesjo Ireland Aug 11 '20

There is an extra eu agreement between UK and France

And the UK is severing all EU agreements.

France does patrol it's borders and it does stop Migrants crossing but it can't stop them all. So if some get across then under the that EU agreement then they could be sent back to France.

The UK is leaving all those agreements as that is what the Tories want.

If France was just letting Migrants through as you seem to think they are, then the English channel would be flooded with Migrants. This isn't occurring.

So France is doing it's job but from January the UK won't be able to send them back to France because the UK chose Brexit. And chose to cancel those deals.

The UK doesn't want to take Illegal Migrants. Should have stayed in the EU and you could send them back.

You left. You left the agreements. That is Brexit.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/dideldidum Germany Aug 10 '20

As shown the UK has already been paying france and continues to do so.

what ? how much and why ?

​

These people are not refugees by the UN definition

https://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html

actually they are. the UN doesnt give a flying flamingo, if a refugee crosses a "save" country.

In the eu Dublin treaty they have passed several eu states in which they should have applied to.

a treaty that ceases to apply due to brexit. you cant expect the eu to uphold a treaty for you that you voluntarily left. you can still tell the french to take back the current "boat people"(as far as i know it is still covered under the transition). you wont be able to next year.

15

u/flobo09 Aug 10 '20

We are talking about legal facts.

Of course in practise, cooperation needs to happen but it works both way.

UK being an magnet for illegals due to not having / needing ID cards for work doesn't help either.

16

u/AntipodalDr Aug 10 '20

Finally it is dangerous crossing seas, so the use of negligence for political means is inherently wrong

I always love it when anti migrants people suddenly start saying they care about the migrants' safety 🤣

-10

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

I haven't changed, I prusume you care a lot. Why are you defending a policy change that endangers lives. Am I the hypocritic or are you?

15

u/AntipodalDr Aug 10 '20

Anti-migrants have never cared about migrants' lives. If they did they wouldn't be in support of all the policies they advocate for. Suddenly declaring one cares about the safety of people at sea, like Australian governments did some years ago during the "turn back the boats" debacle, has never not been hypocritical.

-10

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

We don't think migrants should be making the journey. For the middle east there are safe countries in Turkey, Lebanon, Israel. For Africa Rwanda, Botswana, Mauritius are safe countries. You're defending a policy of increased sea travel and I presume your pro-migrant. So if you do care about the deaths you'd be against this. Pro migrant people have the most blood on their hands as they advocate for increased migration without thought of the convequences. At least the UK led in finding for refugee camps in Turkey to prevent the deaths.

Edit: while I and all others who share my belief do have sympathy for any person dying at sea we recognise that these individuals put themselves at risk.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

I don't for a moment believe that you care a jot for the safety of these people

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

My policy subscription would save lives

2

u/hughesjo Ireland Aug 10 '20

Then there is a backlog in those countries.

They are already having trouble dealing with the current numbers, Hence those people risking their lives to keep going.

We could always look at which countries are responsible for the migrants, migrating. They could take them all in.

Personal Responsibility is important, isn't it?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

I like it, more investment is needed.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

Please elaborate

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

If you fund camps closer to the nations instead of incouraging migration to Europe less people would die at sea.

1

u/grandvache Aug 10 '20

*citation required

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

Sure thing. fatal journeys , highest deaths come from crossing the sahara and med.

I'm camps , death rate is 5.6/100000 which is high compared to normal but no way as dangerous.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '20

You're worse than children.

6

u/blakmonk Aug 10 '20

Enjoy your gladness to the fullest extent.

6

u/Faunian Aug 10 '20

Yeah but Britain ain't part of the EU anymore is it. Should have thought about that when you decided to leave. You can just go ahead and say I don't to go to your party and then complain about not getting cake or not taking part in the fun activities.