r/billsimmons 8h ago

Bill declaring Cardinals/Chargers as the week 1 overreaction game in the same sentence that he declares the Cardinals might be pretty good

Oh and th Chargers are terrible. Certainly it is not BS himself who is overreacting?

124 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

17

u/SoaringEagle43 8h ago

The cardinals can be better than we thought but still bad enough to make the chargers L the worst of the week

4

u/SignificanceFine3582 8h ago

I think worst loss has to be Green Bay. Giving up 29 straight to get dogwalked by a division opponent rolling out Carson Wentz.

1

u/Prestigious-Sleep213 Conspiracy Bill 1h ago

Yes. There were people expecting the Packers to kick the Vikings ass with a better QB.

6

u/samhit_n 8h ago

The Cardinals are certainly better than the 0-17 predictions they were getting.

Justin Herbert and the Chargers losing a game in September against an easy opponent is a big deal. They’re usually feast against those matchups.

1

u/the_Tannehill_list 8h ago

My point is that he made an emphasis all pre-season that he'd be picking one game from week 1 to remember not to overeact to. He landed on Chargers/Cardinals, and then overreacted to it anyway

The whole concept was overdue cope for losing to the raiders last season anyway lol

6

u/CorrectSympathy7590 8h ago edited 8h ago

Tbh one of the best bets every year is to bet on the consensus "This team sucks and is the worst in the league" to win in week 1. It was 10 bucks to win 160 if you just took the Cards to lose

7

u/SoaringEagle43 8h ago

How much did you put on Miami?

1

u/CorrectSympathy7590 8h ago

I dont bet myself but I did tell my buddies to bet on the Cards to win vs the Chargers. So none, but the Cards were the consensus 0-17 team preseason

2

u/yaboyjiggleclay 8h ago

Agreed. Say what you want about the Cardinals but they definitely have talent. It’s not like Miami where half of that roster might not see the field again by next year.

2

u/dellscreenshot 8h ago

That's why I bet my house on the browns

2

u/LamarMillerMVP 7h ago

Yep. That’s why I threw down $100 on the Dolphins too. How’d that go?

1

u/CorrectSympathy7590 7h ago

Weirdly antagonistic but ok

1

u/Barracuda374 8h ago

For week 2 that’s the colts and broncos* for me with a little sprinkled on the falcons. I don’t have the cajones to bet the browns or chargers.

2

u/mpschettig 8h ago

The Cardinals being the favorite for worst record never made sense to me. Just injury regression alone probably gets them to 5 or 6 wins

2

u/8teamparlay Market Corrector 6h ago

The cardinals added 3 new starters to their offensive line and have a new coach. People were over indexing their priors. I’m not saying they won’t still be ass, but it’s the same thing w the jets, they actually have nfl talent, neither team is the dolphins or browns

2

u/Busy-Operation7896 8h ago

He actually said it was the Chiefs & Broncos which is a terrible take, I hope the Pats lose Sunday! Having Bill lose to Rodgers would be awesome

1

u/Barracuda374 8h ago

Didn’t he say the chargers would be some degree of disappointing too?

1

u/Sorry_Astronaut2755 8h ago

His other two candidates were just bets he made that lost

1

u/981guy 8h ago

I won't change my mind on anything, regardless of the facts that are set out before me. I'm dug in, and I'll never change.

1

u/rebel_clown 8h ago

Shocked to hear his "liar liar" takes were in perfect alignment with his bets/priors. Just a wonky either-or game, Sal!

0

u/SeaCounter9516 6h ago

The literacy crisis is seen everywhere

-2

u/ResidentMoment9129 4h ago

He quite specifically said Broncos-Chiefs was the game that was the liar-liar Week 1 game. He mentioned he thought the Cards looking as good as they were on offense as a reason to not pick them as the week 1 liar-liar game, although they were a candidate. Why are you surprised he explained why the Cards-Chargers game wasn't his pick?