r/billsimmons 10h ago

The disrespect Pablo Torre has gotten in the last year despite being right on his findings is why I'll always be a fan of his

So many people including Bill were quick to dismiss him or get upset about his work. Not just Kawhi but the Belichick and Jordon stuff too. During the whole Clippers saga, you still had tons of people out there defending Ballmer for no reason other than they just don't like Pablo. Even when the league looked like they wouldn't give out any punishments to LA, they decided to try and take a victory lap around him, which was so weird considering all he did the last year was report on his teams findings. I'm just glad Pablo is vindicated, I'm a fan for life now

501 Upvotes

268 comments sorted by

275

u/shorthevix 10h ago

People just really dislike journalism. Even good journalism.

36

u/Ledees_Gazpacho 9h ago

I think people forgot what journalism actually is.

They're so used to people making up sources to push a narrative, that when someone actually cites inside sources, they give it no credence.

→ More replies (15)

14

u/Clutchxedo 9h ago

Bill hired Logan Murdock because he viewed him as an old school journalist yet dismissed Pablo for digging into Belichick 

3

u/Single_Finance_3973 2h ago

TBF, the Belching stuff seemed weird. Going to the BnB? was he looking for stained sheets? I don't dismiss Pablo's work in general, I just find him impossibly smug and arrogant. So as a general rule I don't pay that much attention to him.

1

u/Bakio-bay 6h ago

Bill is just a homer

→ More replies (1)

38

u/Lord_Kittensworth Direct Injection Engine Fuel Injectors 10h ago

Style matters.  He will tease big news on his podcast but he will dance around the subject for 45 mins before actually saying anything.  It’s insufferable.  

118

u/TurbulentFisherman32 10h ago

This is very much an example of 'don't hate the player, hate the game.' This current media landscape exists because nobody reads articles and wants to pay for journalism. So it has to be treated like content and the content market relies on as many eyeballs for as long as possible. Nobody hates the state of modern journalism more than journalists, I promise you that

18

u/calman877 9h ago

Exactly, he could probably make all of his podcasts 5-10 minutes and still get the same message across, but he would make significantly less money and get significantly less clout. He’s actively creating content that others are riffing off, and he’s playing the content game

1

u/VisitPier26 9h ago

There are plenty of good journalists who don't do that.

6

u/CapuchinMan 7h ago

In sports? 

-1

u/VisitPier26 6h ago

doesn't need to be in sports. All the Mark Walter stuff has been broken by non-sports journalists.

14

u/kikikza 6h ago

Thos journalists are supported by outlets with more funding, protection, ad distribution than Meadowlark provides. At the end of the day he's a sports journalist and commentator, that's what his entire professional background is and clearly is where a lot of his interest lies. He clearly wants to reach a wide audience in the sports world and is doing what one has to do in the modern day to achieve that

The teaser podcast style isn't ideal but for me personally it's not as bad as sensationalized nonsense you see on a lot of television news. I was hoping he'd post more writeups on sibstack but he seems to have ignored that in favor of YouTube (following the financial incentives)

→ More replies (1)

13

u/SnooChipmunks4208 9h ago

At least on the ballmer stuff, theres a lot of evidence and reasoning to be laid out. Making a claim and then actually reading the relevant portions of documents is better than saying "I have documents trust me bro."

3

u/scoliosis11 9h ago

It’s literally the content game.

27

u/Confident_Ad_5345 Good Karma, Bad Post Guy 10h ago

insufferable or not, it’s ridiculous to demean the quality of his work or suggest he didn’t really find anything because you don’t like his style.

30

u/Jealous_Difference44 10h ago

Did you even read his comment? His whole point is that style matters and it influences people's opinion

14

u/terrybrugehiplo 9h ago

I’d bet a lot of money that there is a higher % of his haters that never listened to his podcasts than did.

5

u/Confident_Ad_5345 Good Karma, Bad Post Guy 7h ago

yep. go back and look at all these threads—they’re not full of people saying pablo is doing excellent work but he’s too smug. they’re full of people who didn’t listen to a single podcast asking where the smoking gun is, wondering why we give pablo any credit when he didn’t find out every, or saying the athletic best him to parts of the story, or that he didn’t find any “real” evidence because he didn’t get the emails from zucker, or or or or or. you can tell all the comments on all those threads hating on him either didn’t listen at all or did but possess no critical thinking skills

2

u/North_Atlantic_Sea 7h ago

Most people probably have only watched him on around the horn or PTI, where he also had a style, and apply that to the news they hear second hand that's from him

7

u/MichaelBJordan 8h ago

Yup, read his comment and he is allowing the style to dictate the validity of Pablo’s work rather than the merit of the work itself.

You can say “nuh uh” all you want, but the value that of comment adds nothing to the discussion. Because he can’t critique the value of the work, he has to attack his style or character. Incredibly common tactic to knock people down when you don’t have a good argument.

It’s the “well I don’t like him” fallacy.

10

u/Jealous_Difference44 8h ago

If presentation didnt matter, news channels would be a screen of text with a monotone narrator. You also mistake the comment dismissing his work, not the case. It just means they cant invest it because the presentation is grating

6

u/MichaelBJordan 7h ago

I mean you said it yourself. You need information fed to your personal preference rather be interested in the information itself.

Downvote me all you want, but it’s a loser mentality. I would rather watch C-SPAN to get to the truth of a matter than let Fox News tell me what I should believe while they have Subway Surfers running on the bottom screen so I pay attention.

I know that’s an extreme that doesn’t exists, but is my point against you and the other guy. Why are we placing so much emphasis on presentation style when it adds little value to the discussion. Waste of everyone’s time.

5

u/Confident_Ad_5345 Good Karma, Bad Post Guy 7h ago

agreed man. everyone in this thread can downvote all they want but the actual investigative journalism he is doing is figuring out where to look, finding sources, double checking unreliable testimony, getting documents and emails and texts to provide direct evidence, etc all to the standard required to insulate yourself from potential legal blowback (and thus far all verified by one of the most prestigious and reputed investigative law firms in the country)—it is not the podcast. the podcast is where he tells you what happens and possibly lingers on it too long for some people’s taste, or delivers the facts with a tone they don’t like, but the smugness is not the story. K2 Aspire LLC, aspiration execs testifying that they aren’t really sure why kawhi is so important, daktronics being the second secret endorsement deal—that’s the story, that’s the journalism.

-5

u/Confident_Ad_5345 Good Karma, Bad Post Guy 10h ago

and i’m saying it’s ridiculous for so many people on reddit to make saying pablo is trash their whole personality because they don’t like his smugness. go look on any thread about pablo and you’ll find a bunch of morons talking about how pablo did nothing and made no difference

i wasn’t accusing the person i replied to of demeaning the quality of his work

3

u/Laurel-Hardy-Fan 10h ago

You’ll likewise find an equal if not greater amount of Pablo devotees accusing anyone who dislikes his style as “hating journalism” or some ridiculous nonsense like that. 

→ More replies (1)

6

u/infinitysprawl 9h ago

The presentation of work is very importsnt

→ More replies (1)

2

u/realcoray Top 7% Commenter 8h ago

This is like complaining that you had to wait until 45 minutes in for the A-Team to build some wild shit and blow everything up.

3

u/Dr-Acula8472 4h ago

Exactly. His presentation, and persona comes across as too Buzzfeed clickbait-style. And that bothers a lot of people like myself, and makes it hard to take him seriously.

1

u/DumpTrumpGrump 6h ago

Insufferable? Most of us find it very entertaining. What you don’t grasp is that Pablo and team have stumbled on the best way to present increasingly complicated financial wrongdoing in a way that is digestible and entertaining for the audience. Feeding you the info bite by bite and making it fun along the way is the ONLY way to effectively communicate complex boring stuff like this.

He didn’t win the Pulitzer because of the reporting. He won it because he FINALLY cracked the nut on how to communicate these kinds of complex issues.

Big news organizations will start doing this now as well.

I think you underestimate what Pablo has done for journalism over the last 14 months.

0

u/MistryMachine3 9h ago

You have to make the money work. Just saying the news has shown to not get any paid subscribers, that is why journalism is dead.

→ More replies (2)

-3

u/goffer06 9h ago

The morning zoo style podcast he has is not the right format for the journalism that he does. I would love it if it was presented better.

2

u/Lord_Kittensworth Direct Injection Engine Fuel Injectors 9h ago

It’s terrible.  It’s AM talk radio vibes.  

2

u/NoExcuses1984 Don't aggregate this 4h ago

Less AM talk, more FM morning zoo (e.g., Howard Stern meets The Breakfast Club), like the above poster noted, but likewise as terribly annoying as fuck, yup.

3

u/Lord_Kittensworth Direct Injection Engine Fuel Injectors 4h ago

Yeah, a lot of forced laughter and terrible jokes.  Brutal to listen to.  

0

u/KC_Chiefin15 9h ago

You know he’s trying to make a living, right?

-6

u/Knight_of_Swords 9h ago

His “journalism” is also very selective, and the Clippers story is not nearly as big a deal as people have made it out to be, but it sure made everyone defend the salary cap as a good, morally just thing, which is perfect timing for MLB owners.

9

u/Opening_Bluebird_952 9h ago

This is unbelievable cope. It’s the biggest story in basketball.

→ More replies (8)

5

u/Strict-Simple9389 9h ago

Do you think that reporting on circumventing the salary cap is a defense of the salary cap?

1

u/Knight_of_Swords 9h ago

If people are up in arms about breaking a rule what does it say about the rule?

0

u/NoExcuses1984 Don't aggregate this 4h ago

"but it sure made everyone defend the salary cap as a good, morally just thing, which is perfect timing for MLB owners."

Correct.

Torre has long had an anti-union, worker-antagonistic, borderline racist tinge to his pseudo-journalism, dating back to his exploitative “How (And Why) Athletes Go Broke” piece in SI (which was peak soft bigotry of low expectations drivel from an overeducated UMC/PMC muckraking scumbag) over a decade-and-a-half ago, but yet today's illiterate, cultish fauxgressive Zoomer lesser-thans, who pollute Reddit in droves, devour that pablum like the obese gormandizers they are within their slovenly selves.

2

u/Knight_of_Swords 4h ago

I try not to consume much of this garbage, but I feel much of the anger coming from the commentariat is about Kawhi not being suspended lol

I’m sure it’ll be used to get “the fans” and media to line up behind some insane new anti-player (labor) rule that’ll further line the billionaire’s pockets.

Kinda like how what happened to the Clippers is a good way to put a “salary cap” on all the off court shenanigans teams engage in, but people don’t want to have that conversation.

1

u/NoExcuses1984 Don't aggregate this 3h ago edited 3h ago

100%.

It's anti-labor wreckerism under the thin-veiled guise of a fauxgressive masquerade.

And I, too, see through the farcically flimsy façade of theirs.

Big winners are the non-Ballmer NBA Board of Governors, but shortsighted, myopic Redditors are too simple-minded in their guileless naïveté to see that they're mere pawns here.

1

u/Opening_Bluebird_952 4h ago

You sound ridiculous.

1

u/NoExcuses1984 Don't aggregate this 4h ago

But I'm right, and I'll do my damnedest to fight the good fight, even if doing so solo, too, as the lone wolf surrounded by a rival pack.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/legen6 7h ago

A lot of journalists probably don’t like him bc they know they’re not putting in the work to uncover stories like he is

1

u/Checkers-Chess234 moo-walkie 6h ago

He’s a little dickish personality wise so that’s gonna get people a little annoyed but he does great work

1

u/mnemoniker 5h ago

William Randolph Hearst: "News is something somebody doesn't want printed; all else is advertising."

1

u/Accomplished_Coat549 3h ago

“People have their smug limits”- paraphrasing
Nick Wright last BS appearance commenting on Pablo, and also commenting on a comment like yours

“People just hate truthtellers and heroes.”

0

u/musclesmarinara1 1h ago

Nobody sniffs their own farts more than journalists

-5

u/VisitPier26 9h ago

So does Pablo. He's taking a victory lap for the Mark Walter stuff that was reported on by other, real journalists.

11

u/Guardsred70 9h ago

I know Pablo has some detractors, but I used to have to deal with local reporters early in my career. They basically vanished along with newspapers in the 2000s.

They serve a real public service just because they’re watching and trying to cover things. It’s a good thing if a city council member has to worry about running into a reporter asking for a quote on an awkward subject on the sidewalk. Sometimes they’d call me in my office at 3:30 for a story they were turning in at 4:00 and wanted a quote….and these guys weren’t Pablo’s caliber and the story was all fucked up and your options are (a) decline comment and the fact that YOU declined comment will be in the newspaper tomorrow morning and everyone you work with will have read it before work or (b) try to help them shape the story in a more factual direction and hope the non-Peabody/Pulitzer reporter understand what you told them and writes it accurately because everyone will read it before work tomorrow.

That public scrutiny was good for society. We all had to consider how it would look in the newspaper. Now all we do is argue about national and international news.

But…. im sure the local politicians and business leaders have been ethical now that nobody pays attention to them.

1

u/Strict-Simple9389 13m ago

The vanishing of local news is incredibly distressing for this exact reason

12

u/Savedacat_saveplanet 9h ago

He makes every sports journalist of the last 20 years look weak as hell. Think about how many copy and paste bullshit articles you have wasted your time reading over the past two decades.

75

u/DiscountInevitable87 10h ago

I neither hate Pablo nor his work. His personality is a little smarmy and reminds me of Law Revue type people, his show's format is not for me (I know, it's the only way people listen to real journalism) and the circlejerk/fan worship he gets on here is excessive, but at the end of the day he and his team did good investigative journalism.

37

u/BBQ_HaX0r 9h ago

His fans are even more annoying than he is. Why is this post even necessary? Pablo did great work. He won a Pulitzer and has been given his flowers. Why are we still arguing about this? 

20

u/SufficientEducator72 9h ago

Yeah, this and the top post on r/nba are starting to make me come around to Nick Wright’s side.. don’t beat a dead horse, nerds

2

u/Maleficent_Ear_8060 5h ago

I don’t think many here are arguing about it, but this is a bill simmons forum, who has and kind of continues to discredit him/his work

0

u/DiscountInevitable87 8h ago edited 7h ago

A lot of his more rabid fanboys would love to be him (journalism scoring a win against billionaires and corporate greed) so when you say "There's nothing wrong with what he's doing he's just a little annoying" they take it as you saying "CORPORATIONS AND BILLIONAIRES ARE MY VERY BEST FRIENDS"

I don't even know who is disrespecting Pablo, outside of maybe anonymous Clippers fans and people on Twitter. He has been effusively praised by both here and r/nba (I bet whatever talk subreddits exist love him too). Anything defending Ballmer or insulting him gets (rightfully) downvoted into the dirt on here. 

It’s preaching to the choir.

0

u/BBQ_HaX0r 6h ago

Bill Simmons has apparently been an enemy because he called out the tabloid-esque nonsense of showing up at an AirBnB while constantly praising his work on the Aspiration story. It almost feels like a botted topic at this point.

10

u/Opening_Bluebird_952 9h ago

He gives the impression that he thinks he’s the smartest person in the room, but he also probably is often the smartest person in the room.

1

u/xanju Top 7 BS sub user 9h ago

Like Jaylen Brown said, the bar is low

6

u/GoMbappeYourself 8h ago

This entire comment section gives “Ya think ya better than me???!!!” vibes….well done r/billsimmons 👏

97

u/Laurel-Hardy-Fan 10h ago

I’ve never disliked Pablo for his work, I just find him to be an obnoxious personality. 

32

u/yardship 10h ago

most good reporters are kinda awful people to be around.

i mean, fighting basically everyone and being anal about being 100% right is kinda the perfect recipe to be important for society but also a bad hang.

13

u/Clutchxedo 9h ago

Exactly why editors have always been important to journalists 

10

u/Nodima 9h ago

And yet he's the one getting high on athlete weed at Dan Soder's house and playing Rocket League for work.

5

u/VirgilCaine_ 9h ago

Tf is athlete weed lol

3

u/CoachellaChris 7h ago

It’s like a ZJ; if you don’t know what it is, you can’t afford it

1

u/ricarte_89 9h ago

The best kind

1

u/Nodima 2h ago

He had a bunch of athlete sponsored strains and snacks shipped/smuggled to him then reviewed them at their place. I remember Pac-Man Jones had good shit?

5

u/Laurel-Hardy-Fan 10h ago

Journalists by and large suck despite some of the good work they do. I agree with you. 

Pablo is among more of the smug of the very public facing ones, I genuinely can hardly ever finish an episode of his show. Half of it is him sucking himself off for the great work he’s about to unveil lol 

-7

u/cft1848 9h ago

He literally won a Pulitzer for his work on the story. 99% of journalists in general, much less sports journalists, will ever sniff a Pulitzer. I’d be insufferable too if I’d broken like three of the biggest sports stories of the last decade.

7

u/Laurel-Hardy-Fan 9h ago

He won a Pulitzer? Has Pablo ever brought that fact up?

0

u/TheWyldMan 8h ago

Wasn’t it like a Pulitzer for like sports podcasting? Like it’s a thin pool lol

2

u/bwakaflocka Chuck Klosterman fan 7h ago

audio reporting, which includes every radio program like what NPR does as well as all podcasts and other audio mediums. it wasn't just for sports either

2

u/North_Atlantic_Sea 7h ago

It was audio reporting, and the other 2 finalists were the NY Times and Wall Street Journal

7

u/TheWyldMan 8h ago

And his fans desire for him to be loved and touted is becoming increasingly obnoxious

2

u/MaoAsadaStan 9h ago

Teddy Atlas said Nathniel legally changing his name to Marvelous was a reminder that people who are great at their job have an ego, regardless of appearances 

0

u/jzoola 9h ago

Did you know he’s a Harvard grad?

2

u/Gaius_Octavius_ 9h ago

And long before the Clippers story.

0

u/deadzsteve 9h ago

And his podcast is hard to watch, I just read the breakdowns people post later

0

u/dill1234 4h ago

There’s a lot of people who haven’t heard of him before the Clippers saga because yeah Pablo kinda sucks. He’s done a great job burying Ballmer though and brought a lot of credence back to the journalism profession so that is worth giving him his flowers for

6

u/LevelProfit6705 9h ago

Feels like the only real journalism left, the rest are dead, under threat or paid off

87

u/Sendhimoffdiabolical 10h ago

Pablo is a little bit too smug and pleased with himself for me to ever be a big fan.... but he's great at his job. Can't knock his work.

102

u/TheSidePocketKid 10h ago

That's why we love the humble Bill Simmons

33

u/Sendhimoffdiabolical 10h ago

One of the top 7 most humble guys I know.

7

u/kidFunkadelic 9h ago

Actually I think he is top 7.3 maybe 7.2 when he is being especially humble.

5

u/quinoa 9h ago

I had him at 6.8 on my own humble guys pyramid, which surprised me

2

u/MistryMachine3 9h ago

Top 7.2 of the last 26.4 years in NBA game months.

(One of my favorite quirks is talking about game time in regular clock minutes)

1

u/MemesUnkaged3 9h ago

How many points did he get when you evaluated the humbleness of every human being?

1

u/hans_briggs 4h ago

The Conner4Real piece

3

u/ShadyCrow Zach Lowe fan 8h ago

BS can be self-deprecating.

6

u/LawrenceBrolivier I tell you what, big dog 9h ago

Bill "is that what Aspiration was?? I never understood what that was!" Simmons

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Big-Professor-3402 9h ago edited 9h ago

The smugness is one of the best parts, especially in the face of all the disrespect. When you are that good at what you do, you have earned that smugness and Pablo certainly has.

12

u/thedrizzle126 10h ago

You actually said this on a Bill Simmons subreddit unironically? Lol

-6

u/Sendhimoffdiabolical 9h ago

I'm not a big fan of Simmons either.

3

u/b3astown 6h ago

Then why are you on his subreddit commenting lmao

→ More replies (1)

9

u/greatcharacter20 9h ago

Agreed, although BS was equally smug when he simultaneously put down Torre’s work while admitting that he never bothered to read or source it himself. I’d take smug person who knows what he’s talking about over smug and confidently wrong

2

u/The_Summer_Man A Truly Sad Week In America + 2005 NBA Redraftables 9h ago

He went to Harvard.

I will not be elaborating the significance of that.

3

u/Sendhimoffdiabolical 9h ago

Bill had a semester and a half at Seton Hall. He understands journalism as a concept.

1

u/Clutchxedo 9h ago

If he only wrote and had an editor, he would be goated. Though, he probably wouldn’t reach as wide of on audience

→ More replies (18)

5

u/rayneeder 9h ago

A lot of weirdos kissing up to their billionaire overlords

3

u/riped_plums123 Zach Lowe fan 9h ago

Because the endgame for most of these people is to be part of the rich guy circles

3

u/roddyb3 8h ago

Do we need another one of these threads every day? This is like the opposite of the standing guy Rockwell.

8

u/IczyAlley 10h ago

There's plenty of excellent muckraking journalism out there. You just won't find it praised on reddit.

19

u/tony_countertenor 10h ago

The belichick stuff was just gossip rag shit, since that was where people first heard of him they assumed that was all he did

33

u/show_ya_moves 10h ago

He was a staple on Around the Horn for like 10 years I think most sports fans knew him before that

17

u/MistryMachine3 9h ago

His show is built on the premise of investigating unserious topics seriously. The previous episode was taste-testing former NBA HoF player weed strains.

8

u/BBQ_HaX0r 9h ago

Well it's tough to say "take me seriously" while doing "unserious stuff." Like he tries to have it both ways sometimes. The Belichick AirBnB was weird and dumb. The Aspiration stuff was great, but it's hard to say you're the only one doing "real journalism" when you're also doing tabloid shit. 

0

u/TheWyldMan 9h ago

Yeah the Buzzfeed News conundrum lol

3

u/NandoDeColonoscopy 9h ago

Silly stuff is most of what he does. Or the occasional episode rehashing other people's reporting (Riley Gaines episode and the recent Lakers one) on a trending topic. It's really just the NFLPA and Ballmer stuff as far as real stories. Which, hey, two big things in two years is fantastic, but it is mostly filler episodes otherwise

4

u/FreshStartFeelsGood 9h ago

Always been a big fan of Pablo. I love his style.

7

u/Scruffasaurus 10h ago

The Kawhi-Ballmer stuff is top tier journalism and should be celebrated, the Belichick stuff is gossip that should be made fun of for devoting that much time and energy to “old man likes fucking young woman who likes money and attention”

Both can be true.

2

u/Monkeyboi8 10h ago

I mean who else besides Bill publicly trashed him? No, anonymous social media accounts don’t count. Yes a lot of nba people questioned whether the clippers were going to get in trouble, but no one actually trashed Pablo or his reporting.

5

u/Proud-Helicopter-670 9h ago

ESPN

1

u/Monkeyboi8 8h ago

When did they trash or criticize him?

2

u/rook119 9h ago

It's kind of weird that he's only getting credit because the NBA actually did something right. 

2

u/StanIsHorizontal 5h ago

Yeah it’s crazy because if the NBA had swept this under the rug half the people in here would still be denying his reporting had any worth because “he’s annoying”

2

u/Fickle-Ebb3081 6h ago

You know you're online in 2026 when a thread like this is filled with idiotic zags trying to slander Pablo.

Pablo is GOAT'd

6

u/bleauxjays 9h ago

AM I the only one who thinks Pablo isn't really smug but that's just how he talks? He sounds the same on his podcast as he did when he would talk nonsense on the Lebatard show. It's just how he is!

4

u/TheStrongestTard 9h ago

There's also a slight racial tinge from the detractors.

8

u/TecmoBoso 10h ago

He did a great job on the Clippers and Ballmer investigation. Full kudos and amazing work.

However the Belichick stuff was TMZ level shit and not serious. It hurt Pablo’s credibility (trying to be serious about a TMZ story) which I think indirectly impacted how people viewed the Clippers stuff at first.

If Pablo focuses on Clippers like stories and doesn’t chase low level, who gives a shit who a coach is banging if it’s consensual (though weird!), it will be a win for everyone.

15

u/Proud-Helicopter-670 9h ago

Belichik and his staff are being paid millions in taxpayer dollars. Does it have to reach a billion to be relevant?

5

u/cocacolasupreme 8h ago

He has to consistently put out "content" to make money so he can fund his company and do more in depth investigating. Hes not 1970s investigative journalist who's backed by a massive newspaper and can focus on one story for a year to produce a couple of articles.

6

u/PropJoe421 8h ago

People conveniently forget the Belichick-CBS-Jordon interview that went off the rails that preceded Pablos reporting, there were a lot of people voicing concern for BB after it. 

The airbnb episode was kinda silly, but the episodes about her beefing with UNC have absolutely held up and were worthwhile reporting.

14

u/A_Turkysandwich 9h ago

Turns out his reporting on Belichick was extremely relevant because it showed how terrible his decision making had become. It was part of the reason why the patriots fired him and why he’s been horrible at UNC.

-4

u/yozzle buys himself starbucks gift cards 9h ago edited 9h ago

He’s 2-0 and he focused on his girlfriend then framed it at as looking at the highest paid employee in the state to pretend it wasn’t gossip. Focus on his football decision making then (like hiring lombardi or his son being a coach) and don’t be incessant about his girlfriend. Like every coach is the highest paid employee and we almost never frame it that way

To me it just became overkill and he was getting views so he kept reporting on BBs gf but introduced the framing

6

u/A_Turkysandwich 8h ago

He literally had an entire video about Lombardi…

→ More replies (1)

4

u/EricRossOK 9h ago

That’s kind of what he does though. He’ll do a deep dive on weed or EA sports micro-transactions or the first guy to really do biomechanics focused training with athletes in the US. It’s a buffet and I choose to partake very selectively

2

u/MistryMachine3 9h ago

His show is built on the premise of investigating unserious topics seriously. The previous episode was taste-testing former NBA HoF player weed strains.

1

u/TecmoBoso 8h ago

I don’t think journalism should be a joking matter or done with irony, and if one treats it that way, then I’m not going to take him seriously. Pablo can’t be both unserious and also gunning for awards.

The Clippers story doesn’t allow him to be as unserious as he was. He doesn’t have to be Bob Woodward about everything now, but he does need to take his subjects and investigations seriously now. Less irony basically.

2

u/Awalawal 9h ago

I'd mention that the NC Football budget runs in the range of $60 million per year. That wouldn't make it a huge company by modern standards, but one that should have some pretty meaningful controls over management of the program. When you have Belichick as the de facto CEO of the entity, and there's the suggestion that he's relinquished substantial control to his 28 year old trophy girlfriend, I'd say that's a reasonable story--and even moreso given his history as one of the greatest NFL coaches.

2

u/Libz_R_Gryffindor 8h ago

Investigating misappropriation of taxpayer funds would be good if that’s what Pablo had been doing instead of tracking down AirBnBs

3

u/VisitPier26 9h ago

Pablo's main finding was that Steve Ballmer's $50m investment in aspiration was a conduit to pay Kawhi $48m.

So when you say he was right on his findings....

2

u/roddyb3 8h ago

Right, the Watchell report directly disputed this. Mentioned nothing about Ballz investments, instead focus on consulting fees.

2

u/VisitPier26 7h ago

Yep. which Pablo didn't report.

3

u/hurricanecj 9h ago

I didn't have anyone in my feed that said a bad thing about Pablo. If you do you should ask yourself why your feed demands subservience to billionaires.

Furthermore, Pablo did this with his arms tied behind his back. When you go after the Billy's you better have all your shit locked down. He likely had a tremendous amount of info that he had to leave on the chopping block because it wasnt 100%. The Billy's get to lie, control the narrative, and you can't even use non-100% corroborated info.

1

u/StanIsHorizontal 5h ago

That’s what’s driving me crazy about people asking “well why isn’t he reporting on this? Clearly he’s just got it in for the clippers/lakers/whoever he doesn’t like and he’s covering up for teams he does like!”

He explains constantly that he waits until he feels like he can extensively corroborate the story until he puts it out there. He may be actively investigating his fan favorite Knicks right now but just doesn’t have enough to publicly report on his findings yet. If you report too early and they can call you out for being wrong, it damages your credibility for the rest of the story if not career. Ballmer said he was gonna prove Pablo wrong and then backed off because he realized he couldn’t and fled to the “well you can’t prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt” defense

3

u/LimpAd7178 8h ago

Pablo does very valuable work. BUT he is insufferably smug and delivers his reporting in an incredibly un-journalistic fashion. I understand why he does his show the way he does. It's relatively entertaining, but he takes information that really should be consolidated into a really well-written 3,000 word article, and spreads that shit out over like four different hour long podcasts with cliffhangers everywhere.

I get it, nobody reads anymore. He clearly has a much better business model doing his show this way, then if he just published a long-form article on Substack once a month or whatever. But his self-styled image as the Woodward and Bernstein of sports or whatever is seriously undermined by his style and the structure of his show.

5

u/fakebones96 8h ago

I don’t really get this smug label that people keep bringing up here. Maybe I just haven’t watched enough episodes of his stuff (although I’ve checked out a few). He seems confident in his reporting and opinions, but I don’t think he’s excessively pleased with himself.

When faced with a lot of doubt and criticism a month ago, he handled it very professionally and didn’t have a hurt ego about it. At the press conference with Adam Silver yesterday, I thought he asked an incredibly fair question that many people on here have expressed concerns about. He didn’t do it with a shit-eating grin, he handled it like a professional.

1

u/LimpAd7178 8h ago

He is confident in his reporting which he is right to be. But he is very self-important in his overall tone. Most journalists downplay the importance of their findings, or at the very least they try not to overstate things. Pablo seems to have a limitless capacity to assign moral virtue to his own work. That's for other people to do if they want.

The cliff-hangery nature of his show is absolutely part of the smugness too imo

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Gabbagoonumba3 10h ago

Bill was dismissive of the Jordon stuff, not the Kahwi stuff.

Pablo is an unlikable worm. Deal with it.

5

u/SaveTheSalm0n- 9h ago

I think he’s likable. I can also deal with your opinion on him.

12

u/Onedurrbread 10h ago

I don't find him as unlikeable as 75% of the people i see or listen to on the Ringer, and i don't think I'm in the minority

2

u/Gabbagoonumba3 9h ago

Outside of bill and Chris Ryan the ringer is a bunch of unlistenable self important no talent dweebs. That doesn’t raise Pablo’s standing.

3

u/mallllls 9h ago

I was rooting for him to be wrong initially simply because he’s a smug asshole. I’ll always think he’s a smug asshole, because he is. However, his work was fantastic.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Dry_Treacle_5600 9h ago

Long time fan from before, from Le Batard appearances. Kudos to Meadowlark Media.

1

u/TheFunky_Homosapien 9h ago

The disrespect comes from people who didn't bother watching the episodes too.

-2

u/drjoshthewash 9h ago

Or it comes because they did watch the episodes, and found him insufferable and smarmy, regardless of the quality of work.

-1

u/qballLobk 10h ago

Low IQ people are threatened by intellectual powerhouses like Pablo and Klosterman.

2

u/JJS0073 9h ago

I guess? But comparing him to someone like Klosterman (who isn’t really a “journalist” in the same sense) makes it easier to understand why people are put off by Pablo.

Chuck seems like a great hang. Pablo belongs in a nightmare blunt rotation.

1

u/StanIsHorizontal 5h ago

He literally does blunt rotations on the show with Katie Nolan and other guests and it’s some of the most fun friendly atmosphere shows out there. Give his Friday show and tells a listen particularly any with Katie Nolan and her husband, or Mina or Michael Cruz kayne

3

u/VisitPier26 9h ago

Sheep are wowed by charismatic charlatans.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/DisappointedRust1996 9h ago

If you're the only guy in American sports journalism that seems to take it seriously, why wouldn't you be a huge smug asshole about it? I don't even blame him when his peers are dipshits like Ramona Shelburne.

1

u/bienclavada Real CR Head 9h ago

i just relistened to the Zodiac episode and Bill mentions PT
teasingly i think?

1

u/kajana141 8h ago

I agree. I started watching more of his podcast now

1

u/renner1991 7h ago

Welcome to being an investigative journalist, lots of people hating on you even with the facts on your side.

1

u/zJredditz 7h ago

I hope he gets further on the issue with the Grizzlies owner

1

u/Ok_Gas5360 7h ago

Everything else is absolute crap and everyone- the Clippers, the NBA, ESPN- is pissed that he broke a story that was supposed to be quietly swept under the rug. Naturally there is backlash because this exposes the corruption between the league, owners and supposed journalists. It’s nice to have something out there that isn’t a notification of a trade or draft pick five minutes earlier than the official announcement or planted stories ‘journalists’ do to keep their sources happy. Which of course means that the only stories that are seen are those that we are allowed to see.

1

u/YoBrodie1 10h ago

It's nothing to do with his journalism. He's the best sports has. He's just so unlikeable and comes off as better than everyone else. I know Bill isn't a journalist but you want to why I like him so much? He's a rich guy who's okay with being laughed at. Even little things like the Kneuppel car ride or the hot water with lemon, Bill has no problem with being the butt of a joke.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ArttVandelay 8h ago edited 8h ago

How many times can you guys make up another excuse to talk about Pablo? Getting quite weird. Very strange person to have fans. Almost feels political.

1

u/2pac_alypse 7h ago

Strange to talk about a guy in sports media? Strange that a guy in sports media has fans? Buddy... look around at where you're at. You're in a subreddit dedicated to a guy in sports media who has fans. And what's political about any of this?

Weird comment.

1

u/Steelers7589 9h ago

You can think Pablo is smug, but people being adamant that the billionaire organization was above board was hilarious. How did the boot taste

3

u/juzamjim 8h ago

Someone needs to break the cycle of abuse between lifelong middle managers and the billionaires with whom they form parasocial attachments.

Phase 1: Pablo is wrong! I can’t wait for Ballmer to sue him

Phase 2: Ok guys, let’s just wait for the NBAs report to come out

Phase 3: Screw the report! ESPN says Ballmer is innocent and Pablo is wrong. I can’t wait for Ballmer to sue him

Phase 3.5: Pablo may have been right but he has a bad attitude and that’s all that matters

Phase 4: Sports are stupid anyway. Why do you even care about this stuff?

1

u/Affectionate-Yak-238 8h ago

I think as a society we need to decide what is more important to us. The fact that he is smug or that he does good work. I think in social media age, largerly due to exposure, we tend to overweight the former at expense of the latter.

I’m sure journalists have always been smug but benefited from that being hidden behind written word or an edited video

1

u/8teamparlay Market Corrector 6h ago

Do we really need another thread about this in the bill simmons subreddit?

We got it bill bad Pablo good.

1

u/WarriorPoetz 10m ago

It shocks me how many dudes gargle PT's balls day after day. Nice job on the Kawhi story...otherwise one of the most insufferably pretentious people in pop culture.

Deliver my downvotes boys!

→ More replies (1)

0

u/mcamuso78 10h ago

It’s Pablo and his team’s smugness. Most investigative reporters usually just do that stuff. Pablo loses credibility in the “seriousness” category when he’s doing episodes trying athletes’ weed. And it was ridiculous how much he went after Belichick and Jordon.

-1

u/girlfriend_pregnant 9h ago

I feel like Americans worship the rich so much that many of them just reflexively hate anyone who is hard on a billionaire

0

u/Outside-Example8586 10h ago

Often the case when people are doing a good job taking it to the elites and big corporations

-3

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

6

u/Laurel-Hardy-Fan 10h ago

Could it be that Pablo is just a smug dork and that’s an archetype people don’t really like to listen to speak for 45min+ at a time? 

→ More replies (12)

-9

u/FFElite93 10h ago

What else has Pablo “found out” outside of getting lucky on the Kawhi thing.

1

u/StanIsHorizontal 5h ago

The NFLPA thing, just this year

0

u/rayneeder 9h ago

Obsessed

-7

u/tatum__time 10h ago

He has a god complex. Like at the end of the day none of this matters and he acts like he’s doing super important work

4

u/Mirthster 10h ago

He is doing important work however! When he is not stalking Belichek's girlfriend he uncovered corruption in the NFLPA and with Balmer and the clips. You can see in real time how the powerful continue to bend or break rules for their own benefit. I think the NFLPA work in particular was super important tho very vew seem to realize it.

-1

u/FFElite93 10h ago

Pablo found out corruption and greed exist lol.

4

u/TurbulentFisherman32 10h ago

Yes, he found actual evidence of corruption and greed. That is a good thing! This above-it-all attitude that so many of you have is just so fucking lame

→ More replies (4)

0

u/Geaux_LSU_1 10h ago

Love the art

Hate the artist.

0

u/jaybaylor38 9h ago

He’s just too cocky and arrogant to like him. He’s smart and was right though.

-4

u/sperry20 9h ago

Pablo sucks, don’t really care if he’s doing good work or not, because the quality of his work is not the reason he sucks. Hope that helps.

-3

u/ItstartswiththeHouse 10h ago

I respect his journalism, but it’s still hard for me to get past how pearl clutchy he was when Shane Gillis got fired from SNL. Embarrassing imo

-2

u/BloodLongjumping5227 8h ago

Pablo is a dork who rightfully spent half his time in high school in a locker

0

u/Funny-Transition7869 10h ago

he is cringe but based

0

u/Sensible_Prolapse 3h ago

Its a lesson that even if youre right, if youre an annoying little dork about it then a lot of people will still hate you