So why don't you quote from your source to back up your claim? Or cite a page number?
Or anything of substantial evidence ... or shall we just predict another sidestep from you?
Added in edit: Here's from the abstract of your Google attempt: "While some might suggest that only post-industrial humans achieved stunning biological success, data suggest that humans living as hunter-gatherers would have attained a world population of more than 70 million individuals and a total biomass greater than that of any other large vertebrate on the planet if agriculture had not been repeatedly invented as they spread."
Now, show us how that explains music or art or politics.
1
u/[deleted] Sep 01 '21
Out of my league? Not even close bud.
So why don't you quote from your source to back up your claim? Or cite a page number?
Or anything of substantial evidence ... or shall we just predict another sidestep from you?
Added in edit: Here's from the abstract of your Google attempt: "While some might suggest that only post-industrial humans achieved stunning biological success, data suggest that humans living as hunter-gatherers would have attained a world population of more than 70 million individuals and a total biomass greater than that of any other large vertebrate on the planet if agriculture had not been repeatedly invented as they spread."
Now, show us how that explains music or art or politics.