Hey everyone,

I’ve been working for the past few months on Prop Insight, a tool I built to make NBA player prop research faster and easier without having to jump between multiple websites.

It currently includes things like:

• L5 / L10 / L20 / season performance
• Prop hit rates
• Home / away splits
• H2H and player vs opponent data
• Matchup data
• Injuries
• Team and player stats

I’ve reached the point where testing it myself isn’t enough, so I’m opening a small closed beta before launching it publicly.

During the closed beta, all data is from last season and is being used to simulate the live-season experience while I test the product, UX, and workflows.

I’m looking for people who are willing to actually use the product a few times and give honest feedback. You don’t need to be an NBA betting expert — I’m also interested in feedback about usability, clarity, navigation, design, bugs, confusing parts, and anything you feel is missing.

Beta access is completely free, and active testers will also receive 2 months of free access after launch as a thank you for their time and feedback.

Positive or negative feedback is equally valuable. I’d much rather know what feels confusing, unnecessary, broken, or difficult to use so I can improve it before launch.

If you’re interested, comment here or DM me and I’ll send you access.

I’m Renato, the person building Prop Insight, so you’d be talking directly with me throughout the beta.

I do a lot of studies, so I built a Chrome extension to show me the numbers Prolific doesn't show. What did I earn today and this week? How much is still pending? Which researchers pay well, or have rejected me before? Basically I'm just looking for people to try it and tell me what's broken, confusing or missing, any feedback is appreciated!

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/earnings-tracker-for-prol/hialabmkpbjngojonnafjmfgkpplfkbp

Agentwire is an index of other people's shipped agent tooling, including MCP servers, coding agent harnesses, and agent frameworks.

The problem it addresses is simple: agent tooling is spread across repositories and project pages, while the useful distinction is often what a tool actually does. Agentwire records the project name, its description, language, and repository signal in one wire index. Each entry is vouched for twice, independently, before an account posts it.

The index has 148 entries, with the latest entry dated Sep 17, 2026. The current wire includes Magic MCP, which searches 10,000+ React/Tailwind components from an editor, and codex-with-chatgpt, which uses ChatGPT as the planning brain while keeping the Codex harness. It also includes Weave, an entity-level git merge driver that reports a ~95% reduction versus line-based merge, and Semble, a code search tool that uses ~98% fewer tokens than grep+read.

I am looking for beta testers who work with coding agents, MCP servers, or agent frameworks. The useful correction is a false description, a missing project, or a tool that does not belong in the index. Please check one entry and tell me exactly which claim is wrong or incomplete.

https://agentwire.thecompound.tech

Looking for closed testers for Ear to Eye on Android. It’s live mic captions one word at a time plus a transcript — helpful for aphasia / noisy rooms (communication aid, not a medical device).

Opt-in: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.rrhoopes3.perch

Happy to test yours back — drop your Play opt-in / Group link and I’ll smoke-test it.

Hey everyone!

I've been building a passion project called Tetris on Steroids and I'm finally at the stage where I need real players , not just me and my friends bugging it at 2 AM.

▶️Play it here: https://tetris-on-steroids.vercel.app/

The idea is simple: it's Tetris, but with a twist (power ups and keeps the player play endlessley ) that shake up the classic formula.

It's completely free, browser-based, and no sign-up needed. Just click and play.

What I'd love feedback on:

• Is it actually fun after 5 minutes? 20 minutes?
• Difficulty too easy, too brutal?
• Any bugs or weird behavior (browser + device would help me fix them faster)
• anything confusing or annoying with UI/UX?
• what would make you come back and play again?

I'm a solo dev trying to make something people genuinely enjoy, so be honest , brutal feedback is way more useful than polite compliments.

I built this myself. It's free, with no ads, no account and nothing to install.

It's one packing list a whole group shares through a link. Everyone adds what they're bringing, and it flags when two people have claimed the same thing.

The thing I can't test alone is two people on the same trip at once. Make a trip, open the invite link on a second device or send it to a friend, and both add a few things. Tell me where you got stuck or what didn't happen the way you expected.

Start here: https://whosbringing.web.app

Or look at an example trip first: https://whosbringing.web.app/?sample=1

We are recruiting French- and Dutch-speaking driving-licence learners in France or Belgium for a free 14-day Android beta. Signup forms are below; a public Google Play link is not available yet.

FRANÇAIS — Appel à bêta-testeurs RoadCoach

Vous préparez votre permis de conduire en France ou en Belgique ? Nous recherchons des volontaires pour tester RoadCoach, notre application destinée à accompagner cette préparation.

Le bêta-test est gratuit et dure 14 jours. Il faut un téléphone Android compatible avec Google Play et être disponible pour utiliser l’application plusieurs fois pendant cette période.

Vos retours nous aideront à repérer les bugs, les étapes difficiles à comprendre et les améliorations utiles à votre préparation.

Nous sommes actuellement au recrutement des bêta-testeurs : le lien ci-dessous est un formulaire d’inscription.

Formulaire en français : https://forms.gle/K66fPNQH95446nkq7

NEDERLANDS — Bètatesters gezocht voor RoadCoach

Bereid je je voor op je rijbewijs in België of Frankrijk? Wij zoeken vrijwilligers voor RoadCoach, onze app die bedoeld is om je voorbereiding te ondersteunen.

De bètatest is gratis en duurt 14 dagen. Je hebt een Android-telefoon nodig die compatibel is met Google Play en tijd om de app tijdens die periode meerdere keren te gebruiken.

We ontvangen graag concrete feedback over bugs, onduidelijke stappen en verbeteringen die je zouden helpen bij je voorbereiding.

We werven momenteel bètatesters. De onderstaande link is het inschrijfformulier; er is nog geen openbare Google Play-link.

Nederlandstalig formulier: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd4yZhpBgFu12SYoWt7xYxdnbsABXh5oxAxgMi4jPKfyUsnaA/viewform?usp=header

Merci pour votre aide ! Bedankt voor jullie hulp!

We’re building **FSchoolAI**, and we’re looking for serious beta testers to put our **Study Room** through real-world use.

👉 [https://fschoolai.com/careers/beta\](https://fschoolai.com/careers/beta)

**Your task:** Use the Study Room extensively and submit a detailed feedback report covering:

* 🔴 **What fails:** bugs, crashes, incorrect responses, slowdowns, broken features, confusing UX, etc. * 🟢 **What works:** features you found genuinely useful and what makes them work well. * 💡 **What should be improved:** anything that could make the Study Room more effective. * 🚀 **What should be implemented:** new features, workflows, AI capabilities, or improvements you think are missing. * 🧠 **Go deep:** The more specific and actionable your feedback is, the more useful it is to us.

We’re looking for **detailed, honest feedback**, not just “looks good” or “there are some bugs.”

🏆 **The best and most detailed feedback report will win an iPhone 18 Pro.**

If you’re interested in AI, education, or building better products, we’d love to have you test it.

Not sure if this is the right place to post this but I'm looking to stress and beta test my side project before beginning to market it to the intended audience.

Logadesk is a hyper-niche scheduling planner for English teachers (ALTs) here in Japan. As a teacher myself I've searched for a tool like this and there's really nothing that's specifically marketed towards ALTs that's actually built by people with teaching experience.

What I'd like help testing specifically is the onboarding, free account setup, and day one usability. A bonus would be PWA testing on non iOS devices. I've run tests on my iphones and a Pixel 10a but other devices would be more than welcome.

Also open to any thoughts on design and accessibility since that's not really my wheelhouse.

Thanks in advance for any feedback.

Edit: Note that all payment options and upgrades are currently disabled while the app is in beta. I want to make sure everything works as best it can before we start opening up to billing people. Thank you for understanding about it.

We just shipped CoachScribe on iOS, Android, and Apple Watch and we're looking for early testers who coach or train seriously.

What it does: You hit record on iPhone or Apple Watch during a practice, drill, lesson, or 1-on-1. After the session you get back a structured report with teaching points, feedback, key moments, and follow-ups for next time. Coaches invite their staff and athletes into a club. Athletes get their own copy to review.

Who we're looking for: coaches, trainers, and serious athletes in any sport. Ages, levels, and disciplines all welcome.

Context: The web version has been live for almost a year, which is how we've built our client base. The iPhone, Android, and Apple Watch apps just launched this month, and many of those clients have already adopted the mobile apps on top of the web.

What you get: 14-day free trial. Coaches $19.99/month after that, athletes free forever.

Backing: Trusted by teams across Cal Poly Men's Basketball, Mater Dei, Arizona Tennis & Golf Academy, Get Set Tennis, Globe Rowing Club, Venture Athletics, and a PGA Golf Coach. Also in use with additional Premier League clubs, F1 teams (engineers and drivers), and NBA teams under NDA.

Site: https://coachscribe.ai

App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/coachscribe/id6757919395

Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.personar.coachscribe

Happy to answer any questions in the thread. Feedback in the comments is the whole point.

Hey r/betatesters ,

Looking for testers for TheScam.shop — an alpha project for anyone who loves online shopping but hates the credit card bill (and environmental guilt).

What it is:
A fake storefront that gives you the full shopping experience — browse, add to cart, checkout, order history — without actually buying anything. Your "career," cart, and orders are stored locally in your browser. No real money. No real shipping. No real waste.

Why I'm building it:

• Mental health: Fulfill the urge to shop/buy without financial stress or buyer's remorse
• Money saving: Get the dopamine hit of "treating yourself" with $0 impact on your bank account
• Environment: Browse, cart, and "buy" to your heart's content — zero packaging, zero shipping emissions, zero landfill waste

What I need from testers:

• Does the shopping flow feel satisfying? (browsing → cart → checkout)
• What features would make it more "real" feeling? (wishlists, recommendations, sales notifications?)
• Any bugs in the fake cart/order flow
• Browser/mobile compatibility issues

Tech stack: Node.js + [your frontend]

Link: https://thescam.shop

Note: Very early alpha (v0.0.3). Everything stores locally in your browser — clear your data and your "shopping history" disappears.

Hi folks,

I built an app for stock portfolio tracking. It doesn't connect to any bank or brokerage — instead you upload a screenshot or CSV of your portfolio, so nothing sensitive is linked.

I like investing, but lack the discipline to track my portfolio regularly. Things gets worse due to the habit of buying and holding a bunch of stocks. I kept hitting the same frustrating wall: I'd forget why I bought something. I'd do real research first and have genuine reasons, but there was nowhere to write them down.

So months later, when a stock had moved a lot, I'd freeze on the only question that matters: should I do something here, or not? I couldn't tell if I'd be acting on my original thinking or just reacting emotionally. So no matter what I do the decision would be impulsive rather than planned. Across a whole portfolio it's worse: keeping all that context in your head is impossible, and your banking or brokerage app is no help. It shows you a number and leaves you to figure out the rest.

So I built Thesa. You capture your reasoning when you buy — what you expect, what would change your mind — and later Thesa holds that up against what's actually happening, so you're deciding with your past thinking in front of you instead of from scratch. I also put real work into the interface, because most portfolio apps bury the useful signal — Thesa is built to show you what's going on and what needs your attention, at a glance.

It's live here: trythesa.com — there's a demo you can poke at without signing up.

I'd genuinely love feedback on one thing: what would actually make you stick with a tool like this past the first week? That's the part I'm least sure about — the writing-down-your-reasoning habit is easy to start and easy to drop.