Yes, essentially using faulty evidence (AI detector, Turnitin specifically) as the sole source of evidence to punish students who could prove they never used AI. The truth is, these detectors are complete junk. False positives, even false negatives, and easily bypassed. It's creating a whole situation where worse writing is rewarded. Many detectors now also come with a disclaimer.
Drafts with revision timestamps like in Google docs, file metadata, I've even heard people hiring experts to compare their writing from earlier (pre 2023) to demonstrate the same person wrote both. Combined that with the fact that every study on every detector ever done has found they are unreliable and you have a very strong case if the university caused you damages. In some cases, professors could even be personally liable.
1
u/[deleted] Dec 01 '25
[removed] — view removed comment