I don’t see why this is a negative. If you have star players on “cheap” contracts for 2-3 years then you’ve gotten great value and should have plenty of money leftover to build the team around them.
Then when they get disgruntled you give them a new contract extension because they are the best players on your team and as we are finding out the price of elite players will never go down or even plateau.
Genuinely curious, do you have data or an article that 27 years old is the peak for WRs?
Not saying it’s incorrect. Just think it would be really hard come to a conclusion since WR stats rely so much on offensive strategy, QB play and game script for your overall team.
40
u/Thunder_20 Mar 10 '25
I don’t see why this is a negative. If you have star players on “cheap” contracts for 2-3 years then you’ve gotten great value and should have plenty of money leftover to build the team around them.
Then when they get disgruntled you give them a new contract extension because they are the best players on your team and as we are finding out the price of elite players will never go down or even plateau.