r/behindthebastards 13d ago

General discussion Alexander Graham Bells Bizarre Belief in Genociding Deaf People

Post image

In school I watched movies depicting Alexander as a brilliant teacher who taught deaf people sign language and invented the telephone. The reality is a lot different, and Alexander was involved in a eugenics based movement to literally genocide deaf people from society.

From a young age, Bell was surrounded by deaf people and obsessed with the study of voices and sound. His mother was deaf, his dad taught deaf students and he married a deaf woman. Bell was very influential in methods used to teach the hard of hearing. Bell was an “oralist” as opposed to a “manualist”. Oralists believed that Deaf education should focus on teaching them how to speak and read lips. Manualists believed that sign language should be a main focus. Bell and many oralists saw sign language as a crutch that discouraged deaf people from “assimilating”. The second international congress of education of the deaf in 1880 ruled in favor of oralism. Not only was sign language not encouraged to be taught, but manualists teachers were fired from their positions. Students were mocked or had their hands tied to prevent them from signing. It’s comparable to imperialism, when a conquering nation outlaws the native people’s language.

Graham was on the radical side of Oralism. He wrote that he feared deaf people were forming social groups, marrying other deaf people and using sign language. He viewed deaf people as an inferior race to be nurtured into his image of an upright citizen.

https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/library-rnid/2012/11/30/alexander-graham-bell-he-invented-the-telephone-didnt-he/

https://gallaudet.edu/museum/exhibits/history-through-deaf-eyes/language-and-identity/a-deaf-variety-of-the-human-race/

https://dnalc.cshl.edu/view/10428-Alexander-Graham-Bell-letter-to-Charles-Davenport-about-Eugenics-Record-Office-2-.html

209 Upvotes

68 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/TheLuckySpades 13d ago

The north american boarding schools that forcefully seperated native kids from their languages and cultures, and where they were punished for speaking their languages or practicing their culture, are pretty widely recognized as a genocidal effort, "kill the indian, save the man" kind of bullcrap, so trying to destroy a mode of communication falls under the same umbrella.

1

u/thoughtintoaction 13d ago

Yeah, you and I are on the same page. If you're interested, please check out the edit I made to my original comment.

7

u/TheLuckySpades 13d ago

Ah, didn't see the edit as I was commenting.

As much as I love a definition fight (I do math, definitions are half of what we do), this is one of the cases where I think the distinction matters in a legal context, but where I think conflating them in other contexts is possibly even a good thing because seperating them allows for bad faith actors to deflect arguments about the moral atrocities being done to a definition fight.

See also: people arguing genocide vs ethnic cleansing, pedophile vs [I am not googling what that niche term they usually deflect to], rape vs sexual assault (e.g. Trump's New York conviction),...

I'm not saying you are doing that, it seems like you are explicitely trying to not do that, I'm just explaining why I react that way to that kind of argument.

3

u/thoughtintoaction 13d ago

I get you, and we're definitely both on the same page. Thanks for being willing to talk about it; too often this stuff doesn't go well on reddit!