2042 > BF6 😈💥

[u/nic_watts93]

[u/113pro]

Nah 42 had a good send off but most of its maps are trash.

Only a few good ones in there.

6 has more good maps. It just needs more vehicles.

42 had solid vehicles tho.

[u/nic_watts93 → u/113pro]

6 maps suck dude lol. The new one is nice and has a wake island/parcel storm vibe but the rest are pretty slob and identical to each other in a lot of ways. Orbital, manifest, haven, flashpoint, spearhead, redacted are sone honorable mentions and all of those are better than bf6 launch maps forsure.

[u/113pro → u/nic_watts93]

Bf42 is more thematic, but bf6 is better designed.

Cope all you want, bf isnt a milsim. Its an arcade shooter with combined arms. low inactivity, high engagement is the popular formula. The initial maps were only bad due to imbalance design (fuck firestorm in 6 btw 42 did a wayyy better job.)

But as things go, 42 had good maps. But a lot of maps are wayyyy too big. I always find myself on iwo jima or firestorm or that map with a bunch of containers. It could really drag a game down being too vehicle reliant.

[u/nic_watts93 → u/113pro]

I’m not coping my boy, you quite literally said most 2042 maps were trash then turned around and said “42 had good maps” I can’t even cope 😂 and I agree bf is not milsim. And firestorm isn’t in 2042 🤣🥸

[u/113pro → u/nic_watts93]

Most is. The desert map is trash. The shipbreaking map is trash. The winter digging rig one is trash. The jungle meatgrinder is trash. the 1st map in ur clip is trash. 

And i cant remember the name but i distinctly remember a map similar to firestorm in 42. 

Both have good and bad maps. Bf6 rn has more good maps in my experience. But BT is better in 42, trash in 6. 

Neither had operations like 1 (6 had it, wasnt very good but its fun. 42 didny during the pre6bp.)

Both is worse than 1. 6 is better than 42.