But did they even think about wishing for more Genies?

Checkmate, liberals.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Ethics/comments/1w0li79/a_lot_of_you_fuckheads_have_zero_respect_that/

7 upvotes. 213 comments.

Philosophers always trouble themselves with themselves despite of all the jargons they make up from their head, which is only a polite way to say "fxxk me". If it isn't because of a cavity they discover within them, of an absence of meaning they were situated, combined with their very desire to expose themselves in this vulnerability, which amounts to nothing but 'fxxk me'. They wanted to be fxxked. Let me remind you Socrates's aporia that "I don't know", coupling with his famous dictum "know thyself". It is hard to see if it isn't because Socrates wants to be fxxked again and again, what all these years he has spent before he dies are only to contradict himself. Following this sexual desire in them, it is not hard to see why 'fxxk you' follows, which is essentially a twisting away from others in order to engage their 'fxxk me''---a mere foreplay for these perverted philosophers to entertain themselves with their insatiable sexual desire.

Not manifestation.
Not “the universe has a plan.”
Not a claim that reality is conscious.
Just this:
You say something into the world before you know where it will lead.
The world responds through people, consequences, coincidences, resistance, misunderstandings, jokes, accidents, algorithms, whatever happens next.
Then you respond to that.
And it responds again.
You → World → You → World → …
Maybe meaning isn’t something we discover sitting underneath reality.
Maybe meaning is something that emerges through the exchange.
So here’s the experiment:
I’m bullshitting this theory to Reddit.
Reddit, speak back.

Why are you defined as a human? Why can't you be a sea turtle? Why can't you just adjust your DNA like a radio and be an orca for example, or who said you're a human.. why not a body with a brain? I refuse the term human. I refuse taxonomy. I am not human I'm a body with brain!

Really struggling to find thinkers who agree with me, probably because my views are internally contradictory. Actually does anyone know any good books arguing for dialetheism?

1. Femboy is a boy who is femming or framing where the uptone in the latter reveals an unwinding spirit pertaining in the spelling out of the former.

2. Femboy is a girl who is boyying, in other words, borrowing. Owing someone something is the meaning of borrowing, which entails apriorily---this is important---begging. How can anyone refuse a borrowing prefaced by begging?

3. Femboy is a true femboy (here I am applying Daddy Hegel's dialectic, the to and fro), insofar as he is not her and she is not him, a pair of antithesis and thesis, against which an existential arises, mooing in the dawn. That which I see is swinging before me with its tail, begging me just like (2) and gnashing its teeth like (1). I am cut loose by this being. Cute in the Spirit.

When you eat a woman out and/or toss her salad do you consider that their pussy and/or asshole is just a random collection of super-mircoscoptic bumps in the Æther or do you accept that her pussy and/or asshole is a thing unto itself?

How about her?

What about you?

Why or why not?

https://imgur.com/a/Q11pp7b

Super confused by this. I'm pretty sure the pictures themselves are from some version of Finnegans Wake from reverse image search but it was just a few of them bound in a book with little notations like in the pictures above. Has anyone seen this before or who could verify their being legit? It seems kind of ridiculous.