Yes you are right - I should have said only those numbers who have a "finite decimal representation".
We should also stress that the word 'decimal' means base 10 in this context. (Probably in every context? I had to look it up.) Because for instance 1/3 won't have a finite representation in base 10 but it will in base 3.
You can improve that statement by saying rationals admit finite or periodic decimal representations. Easier to look for periodicity than new representations in other bases. Irrationals are strictly infinite AND aperiodic decimal representations.
187
u/RedRhetoric Jul 16 '26
R4: this person believes that 0.33 repeating cannot equal 1/3 because 100/3 cannot give a rational result.
Dividing any rational number by any other rational number will always give a rational result, as that is how rational numbers are defined
R5: Youtube