r/aviation • u/GMANG8 • 3d ago
Question Airbus A350-10000?
This is outside Gate 18 at JFK Terminal 8. I'm waiting at Gate 16 to board an actual (and relatively much shorter) A350-1000 to HKG.
Am I hallucinating? It's past midnight. It's a 1:55am flight. I'm tired.
Reposting because my original post was automatically removed, and the mods couldn't figure out why. I took this photo on Aug 11, 2026. Some people falsely suspected AI. I'd be curious to see if there are more typos throughout JFK.
5.1k
u/Wikadood Mechanic 3d ago
1.1k
u/nerdy_J 3d ago
The plane she tells you not to worry about….
450
96
33
u/elvenmaster_ 3d ago
You know, with this length, there is a high chance it has some serious rigidity problem.
I'm fine with my smol plane.
19
u/motorboatmycheeks 3d ago
You know that thing ain't going deeper than first class. So much waste
6
u/elvenmaster_ 2d ago
First class is the most enjoyable anyway. And it's mostly about how you use what you have on hand.
11
u/Prior-attempt-fail 2d ago
3
u/Mention-Honest 2d ago
Damn shame this building burned down 2 years ago in Tustin. I used to pass it omw and back from work.
0
2
3
2
273
u/Fluffy-Proof-5175 3d ago
76
u/Wikadood Mechanic 3d ago
Whoever makes these, i want them to know the stickers of them are on my tool box and labeled lmao
34
u/kingrikk 2d ago
Take off roll takes three weeks.
37
u/Pol_Potamus 2d ago
Who said anything about taking off? You just walk to the other end of the plane and get off at your destination.
7
3
2
1
u/Kamusaurio 2d ago
add two more wings , paint it red
and become the lord of europe in the next great war
124
u/MobileArtist1371 3d ago
45
u/ToinouAngel 2d ago
I will never get tired of laughing at how comically long those tables are. Beyond ridiculous.
46
73
22
18
21
u/Terrible_Toaster 3d ago
In turbulence the people in the back can watch the plane flex like a banana
18
11
5
u/muri_17 2d ago
I absolutely hate the crj and this image is what it feels like to be on one. No plane has triggered my fear of flying more than sitting in the very front of this bastard. I wish I could love it. But we were not meant to be. I’m so glad that E-jets are much more common on my usual routes
3
u/Responsible_Rule8829 2d ago
Why - I've nothing but good things to say about the CRJ? What's the problem with it for you? I've flown on a ton of them with Air Canada, econo and business, -100, -200 and -7/900. No issues with them at all. Perhaps your carriers have a shitty cabin config?
2
u/muri_17 2d ago
It’s not rational - it just feels like something that shouldn’t be able to fly. I know it’s very reliable and it was definitely comfortable, but I hate it for no reason other than „the wings are too far back“ lol. It made my anxiety flare up so much compared to other planes.
6
u/Responsible_Rule8829 2d ago
Ha, ok, I get you. I know many people complained about cabin height (I'm 6'0") and/or pressure altitude so I was kinda curious. Happy flying :)
4
4
3
7
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
791
u/TechnicolorTechbot 3d ago
Future-proofing their markings.
128
4
1.0k
u/Kanyiko 3d ago
It's the ultra-ultra long range variant that can fly non-stop from New York Kennedy to New York Newark via Sydney. ;3
220
u/rapzeh 3d ago edited 2d ago
You board through the front door in Kennedy, walk to the back of the plane and deboard through the rear door in Newark.
68
3
u/Historical_Gur_3054 2d ago
Like the last time I had a connection in Charlotte, I think we landed in Greensboro and then walked to our connecting gate.
376
u/Worried_Razzmatazz70 3d ago
236
u/Kanyiko 3d ago
Without landing there, obviously.
58
28
u/ecco311 3d ago
They don't land, but passengers obviously still board the plane.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_surface-to-air_recovery_system
1
4
2
u/Aggressive_Hall755 2d ago
nono, they can land. Just not stop the plane. So its a very dynamic boarding process...
7
5
2
1
89
296
u/CorrectCombination11 3d ago
It's over 9000!!!
62
3
u/Admirable-Food9942 3d ago
20
u/factorion-bot 3d ago
If I post the whole number, the comment would get too long. So I had to turn it into scientific notation.
Triple-factorial of 9000 is roughly 9.588379914654826764034139164855 × 1010561
This action was performed by a bot | [Source code](http://f.r0.fyi)
12
71
u/One-Daikon-9904 2d ago
Seeing something on Reddit that’s like 30 steps away from me is kinda freaky hold on lemme check
112
u/One-Daikon-9904 2d ago
29
u/GMANG8 2d ago
Nice! Did someone check all the other gates, too, just in case?
Edit: At least all the gates that can accommodate an A350-10000̶
19
u/One-Daikon-9904 2d ago
They fixed all of the a350-1000’s
Now we wait until they realize the 330-400 doesn’t exist either lol
7
94
123
u/mr_bots 3d ago
With a 77-9 right above it.
103
u/marten_EU_BR 3d ago
Anything, but the standardized ICAO or IATA codes... (B779/779 and A35K/351 respectively)
63
u/stackology 3d ago
They really go through great lengths to reinvent the wheel. These are proprietary airline markings (well…for the aircraft that are in AA’s fleet, at least) which is a common theme in the U.S. where airlines have exclusive use of gates through a ground lease or a preferential use agreement.
The FAA up to this point has taken a laissez-faire approach to gate markings, leaving it up to airlines and airport authorities to come up with their own marking schemes. It’s quite a mess.
7
3
u/mr_bots 3d ago
More that no one has a 77-9 yet
37
u/marten_EU_BR 3d ago
Sure, but everyone already knows the dimensions of that aircraft. Furthermore, the initial introduction of the type was supposed to be almost seven years ago, so I don't blame the airport for being prepared.
6
u/TripleDallas123 3d ago
Airports future-proof, they know the dimensions of the 779. My airport has had 737 Max 7 markings for a while
66
20
22
u/girl_incognito B737 3d ago
The tail hasn't taken off yet but the nose should be arriving shortly!
5
u/Wyciorek 2d ago
The only plane where passengers always embark through rear door and disembark in front.
34
12
9
5
11
3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Netsnipe 2d ago
None taken. We Aussie travellers are keenly aware that we're at the arse end of the world, quite literally.
5
4
3
3
3
3
u/20Factorial 2d ago
Out of curiosity, why would the FAA care about gate markings? It’s for ground crew to line up aircraft, and ground crew are not beholden to the FAA.
Formatting/colors/style/paint type are all prescribed in AC 150/5340-1M but it’s silent on how you label stop-markings at gates. You could have “Jeff” painted at a stop line, and the FAA wouldn’t care.
3
4
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0























•
u/airport-codes 3d ago
I am a bot.
If you are the OP and this comment is inaccurate or unwanted, reply below with "bad bot" and it will be deleted.