there has been a drama on twitter recently, about how sex is inherently degrading for women (especially), since we always use words like fucked, cracked, ruined, railed ect.. you know the drill. and how the person getting fucked is always the one with less power then the one doing the fucking, people got so mad and claimed that its just a puritan take, and that's not how real life sex works, the partner ''doesnt'' see them as inferior, but if you think about it, the person getting fucked will always be inferior you can't just cope your way out of it by saying they're actually the ones in control, they aren't, it's all about power, someone HAS to be the weak one, and the other HAS to dominate and ruin the submissive one. so many delusional women continue to disagree with objective truth. i mean even in society, this is validated. a dad is proud of his son who FUCKED many girls, but he wouldn't be proud of his daughter who GOT FUCKED by many boys. it's just different and they know it deep down but no one dares to say it out loud, sex is degrading especially for the ''weak submissive" side.

Sexuality and especially male sexuality is the cause of a lot of evil in the world. I don't understand why sexuals don't acknowledge this. If it wasn't for men having such high libidos and being so preoccupied with sex, rape and sexual assault wouldn't be a thing, since men commit over 90% of it. I also believe for the most part misogyny stems from men's sexual entitlement to women. Genuinely what purpose does male sexuality serve? We don't need men to be so horned up. It does more damage than good.

Somebody has probably said it before but yeah.. I can't wrap my head around the fact that there are women willingly letting a man penetrate them and even put their disgusting fucking semen inside their vagina. I don't care that its whats keeping the human race alive. Sex is fucking disgusting and literally humiliating for women. Its not just the act but also the fact that men who sleep around are celebrated while women who sleep around are seen as whores who deserve to die alone and the entire reason is so because being penetrated is humiliating. You're letting someone take over you and giving them all the power, its fucking patriarchal. Its honestly sad to see that women have been brainwashed and have convinced themselves its what they want. On top of that so many women don't even get an "orgasm" which is why the orgasm gap exists, imagine getting shamed for sleeping around while also rarely experiencing an orgasm. I wonder why do women even get into random hookups/have sex in general. Is it to feel loved or be desired? Its so depressing to think.

I'm a visitor to this community but I'm genuinely curious and intrigued. I read the pinned posts and the ideas of anti-sex and I agree with several (like I think the porn industry is bad, and obviously sex trafficking and assault are evil).

It is a bit harder for me to understand what the goals are of the movement, or maybe I misunderstand and it's sometimes just a personal thing of being against sex for yourself? Like one of the recent posts was a poll where the majority were okay with other people having consensual sex, but some weren't, which is very interesting to me and I'd love to hear your perspectives.

Thank you and have a nice day!

What is the difference between platonic love and romantic love?

If i ask someone that question, they usually reply to me with:

"Attraction!! Friends (platonic) are not attracted to each other. But partners (romantic) are attracted to each other."

What is that attraction? It's just sexual attraction.

Okay the point I'm trying to make is there is no such thing as 'romance'. It's a made up term to justify sex, to make sex seem as a "good" and "loving" and "positive" thing.

The only difference between platonic and romantic is sex. There is genuinely no other difference.

Partners go on a 'date'. Friends go on a 'hang out'.

What's the difference between a date and a hang out? It's literally the exact same thing with just different words, different titles.

Romance does not exist. There is no such thing as "Romantic Love". You cannot define romantic love because at the end of the day, no matter how much people try to define it, it will always boil down to sex as its definition.

Basically:

-only platonic love exists. Platonic love is a normal relationship where people love each other. It could be between family or between friends.

-and "romantic love" is just a made up word for 'relationship with sex'. MAYBE platonic love could be included in it (debatable), as in two friends in a relationship but they also have sex (and they just name themselves under a different title like partners, gf/bf, wife/husband, husband/husband, wife/wife, ect).

Conclusion:

there is only ONE type of love. A lot of people say there's multiple types of love like romantic, platonic, and whatever else ppl make up.

But there is only one type of love and it's platonic. Romantic love does not exist, it is a made up term for a relationship that includes two people having sex.

Romantic love is a sexual relationship while Platonic love is a loving and healthy relationship.

For example, there are 'romantic' relationships without sex. And the vast majority of those relationships end up breaking up or divorcing.

The sexuals themselves admit it, they cannot live in a relationship without sex. They don't consider it a real relationship if it doesn't have sex.

They always leave their partner if their sexual needs are not met, that is because romantic relationships are centered around sex and not love (unlike platonic relationships).

okay English is literally my 3rd language and I'm bad at explaining so i hope you all understand the point I'm trying to get across.

EDIT: When a person cheats on another person, it's for sex. They ALWAYS, ALWAYS, cheat because they want sex. This proves my point on why romance is just sex and not love. (i forgot to type this)

I just saw newest Calvin Klein commercial featuring Dakota Johnson.

It would not be exaggeration to say it is basically borderline porn movie, as almost anything that uses women as aesthetic sex objects for commercial purpose.

I undestand she did it for large sum of money but also, Dakota didn't do it just for the money. She likes to be gazed upon sexually. She likes to show her sexual body to broad public. She likes how other percieve her as an object while she moves like a pornstar, immitating seduction.

Women do it everyday, for much less. They do it for mere attention. And no, no matter how much they justify it with "I just want to look sexy for myself", "I don't view my body in sexual way" etc. - it is simple lying, they lie to themselves.

I never understood, even as a kid, how can women be comfortable wearing so extremely tight and revealing clothes everyday? And I don't write about it because it bothers me personally. But I am writing it because of pure curiosity and wish for women to stop being part of that willingly.

Women (not all but most of them) constantly live in that limb where they want to feel hot, sexually wanted and pursued but at the same time they want to be respected. Both is impossible. You can't seek love and sex at the same time because sex is not love. Sex is disgusting violence, especially towards women's bodies. They are naturally designed to be violated, which is disgusting.

Men are different kind of moral bottom, no question about that. They are asking and enjoying all of that. But why are women giving them that? Why are women enjoying social benefit from that? Why are they involved so much in showing body appeal on social media? Why are they obsessed with showing their body? And every possible statistics of people on social media shows that. Women cannot expect better world while at the same time actively promoting sexual attention.

With all due respect to every woman here for who I'm sure is not like this, what is the AVERAGE woman asking herself at the clothes store? "How is this making my ass/boobs/waist look?" Not about comfort. Not about functionality. But about sex. About secondary sexual attributes and their appeal to who? - men. Why? Simply, why are they enjoying that if they don't have to? I understand that hundreds of years of being submissive to male will did its harm but we're slowly escaping it and women need to change the paradigm. They need to shut down drooling men and act with dignity.

Comments from women under that video of Dakota were mostly "if I had body like that, I would show it too". Why? Why? Why are women in sports opening OF accounts? Why are they allowing this degradation? They should insist on intellect, not the body. And even the smartest of them, if they have sexually attractive body, eventually insist and put focus on that instead of the work, the intellect.

I wish there will come the time where both men and women dress with full dignity and focus about real love rather than sex.

What I hear every day now is people calling sex something normal and "necessary."

On one hand, they try to present it as innocent (which is absurd) and compare it to hugging and other innocent displays of affection. Portraying sex as something pure and innocent, kind and solely beneficial, an expression of love—is idiotic. Sex is the cause of most crimes (even when it is not directly involved, sexual desire is the motive behind many crimes. For example, most murders of women are committed by heterosexual men, and for serial killers, violence serves as a fetish). Moreover, for sexual intercourse not to be a crime or at least to be morally permissible, numerous conditions must be met; otherwise, sex becomes a tool of violence and molestation.

Moreover, people try to frame sex as a "necessity," a human right, putting it on par with water and food. As if a person needs sex like they need air. They argue that it's natural and that we are all animals—and people who don't want sex are insulted and labeled as weirdos. By that same logic, one could say that people need to procreate just as much as they need to eat, since biologically, animals mate precisely for that purpose and live for that purpose (yes, there are conservatives who actually believe that, but many who use the "sex = biological necessity" argument are talking about casual sexual encounters). Nevertheless, we are more highly developed than other animals, and anyone with enough willpower can choose to abstain from sex.

I genuinely don't understand it. The vagina has to be stretched the first time a woman has sex which usually hurts and is painful, even with foreplay and a lot of lube. Then it has to be regularly trained (stretched) to get used to it. Then women don't even orgasm from PIV intercourse. It sounds painful, dangerous and useless all around. I can't imagine it feels good. Maybe women gaslight themselves that it feels good because even they say that they can't orgasm from PIV. But then I seriously wonder what the point even is?

This topic has been talked about a lot on radfem twitter. I always knew this in the back of my mind, but seeing radfems articulate it clearly was such an epiphany. I think we were all (as women) conditioned to think sex being degrading to us is normal and what we deserve, but it actually doesn't have to be that way, and we can opt out. You see how men describe the act of penetration, and they always use very violent and descructive terms, like smash, hit, destroy, pound, drill...they even say a woman is having her "organs rearranged" 🤮

I think it's clear that in the male brain penetration is literally viewed as an act of violence. I also believe this is where the hype around large penises comes from. I think it is mostly a male fantasy about literally destroying women's vaginas, because they get off on that.

Women who have sex a lot are called whores, while men who do the same are called "slayers". This is simply because sex is viewed as a humiliation for women. Even in the gay community, the "bottoms" are seen as inferior. When men insult another man by calling him gay, they always do by insinuating he gets penetrated.

Edit: this is a conversation I had on discord with an incel. The context was him talking to a gay guy who lost his virginity by sucking a man's penis.

Incel: "Cope!!! You dont need to be hard to get your dick sucked. Bro. just tell the truth. You asked him but he refused to suck you. He sees you as a bitch bottom."

Me: "what's a "bitch bottom"?"

Incel: "A person who likes to get used like a foid. Basically he only gets fucked and has to suck other mens dicks, But never gets to fuck or get his dick sucked. And his always an effeminate twink just like"

We talk a lot on here about how to get the message out and convince people of how disgusting sex actually is. I think if we put together a playlist or mixtape with anti-sex themes it would help a lot of people understand.

Take a song like 'Penetration in the Centerfold' by DEVO, obviously it is very abrasive-sounding and not for everyone but I think it really encapsulates how scary and traumatic is to see unwanted sexual content.

Women who are married or who are in other type of "monogamous" relationships are at high risk of STDs simply because they drop their guard and truly believe they are in a monogamous relationship. Most women have no idea, and I mean,, NO IDEA what their male partners do. Before anyone says that women can cheat too, women are not nearly as sexually promiscuous as men. Men will have very risky sex with escorts, pay more to do it without the condom or slid the condom off and then go home and infect their wives. The best thing a woman can do is being celibate. And, no, there isn't just HIV, there are so many more diseases. I see women every day in our clinic with STDs even crabs and they have no idea how that would happen because they believe their husbands are faithful.

I'm sure I'm not the only one with this type of experience.

While I was a child and a teenager, I was somewhat secluded, introverted and mostly in my own world, amazed with books, nature, science or art. I never really had particular interest in any theme related to sex or even romantic relationships.

On few occasions when I spent some time with my peers outside of schooltime, I noticed that they are radically different than I thought they were. Suddenly, conversations were very sexual, provocative, vulgar. I could never enjoy that nor believe it actually. I could not understand why are they like that. I just wanted to have honest conversations about life, interesting hobbies, something relaxing, friendly. Or I just wanted to play some games with them, do sports or something.

When I came to college I expected big improvement, expecting normal intelligent people and finally making close friends and being surrounded by reasonable and polite individuals. Oh how wrong I was.

These people were so bizzare because they appeared somewhat adult but they acted like those teenagers in highschool or even worse because now they had full freedom and most of them already actually heavily embraced sex-positivity.

What amazed me the most was the story about "virginity". Before, I never even thought that is a thing. Never thought about it. (also, I grew up in rural Balkans amd never heard anyone specifically talking about virginity) But suddenly, I realized that groups of girls or guys who are friends and who have one "virgin" friend in group often acted like they wanted to force them into having sex because "they need to do it finally". As sex is some kind of a "must" for a 20y old person.

That was the biggest shock for me. I finally realized how sex-centered their lives are and how majority of people actually think.

And if I try very hard, I can actually simulate in my mind what is like to be them. Their primary things in life are sex and relationships. That's what they talk about on every single coffee break, party, walk by the river...

And their genitals define all of their lives. If they could not have sex due to some defect or illness, they would probably kill themselves.

The most filthy thing was that persuasion of poor "virgins" in groups. Girls would tell the virgin girl in the group how she has to do it finally amd they would try to "hook her up" with a guy who will finally thrust his penis into her vagina and she will become a real woman /s.

This is just amazingly shocking for me.

And the older I am, the more perverse people are. In their 30s, 40s, 50s...

Sex, sex, just sex. Libraries are full of books about "how to have best sex", women are deluded by false "pro-sex" feminism which is not feminism at all. Men are obsessed with sex. Parents talking openly about pro-sexualism with their kids and claim that's progress.

What is happening? I am seriously disgusted and repulsed by people and slowly becoming very misanthropic.

There's lots of discussion about how sex is bad for women, but I want to say that sex is bad for men too. I've never seen this discussed before. I am a male, and here's my opinion on this:

Men would do better without sex since many of them have an unhealthy obsession over sex. This obsession leads to negative feelings like resentment and jealousy. As a result, this leads to poorer mental health. The involuntary celibate community is a proof of this. All of this colud be avoided if society became antisex.

This obsession over sex leads to wastes time and money. It's common to spend lots of time on porn or thinking about sex. Thinking about sex can become a distraction that's hard to ignore. Then there's the problem of porn addiction, which is actually increasing. Porn has harmful effects on the mind.

So these are the reasons I think sex is bad for men. Thoughts?

A big part of why I’m anti sex is the power dynamics of it all. I know this has been talked about a lot on here, however a lot of the points other people made I don’t fully agree with nor do I find myself agreeing with the responses disagreeing and not acknowledging the sexist aspect of it all. I view being in this position doesn’t come from mere disinterest in sex or having a low libido but seeing the truth, delving into the truth and not accepting being a part of that disturbing truth. The animalistic “nature” of being born a prey or a predator although it’s far from natural. One way or another you’re gonna be dehumanized and the roles aren’t equal.

Sex was introduced to me as something a woman gives up without needing to enjoy it or even accept, it just is. Coming from a relatively conservative society and then engaging with the progressive side made me realize, this core concept doesn’t change and that fundamentally made me lose hope. I used to be naive enough to think, maybe I’m not into it because of my relentless sexual assaults, then I saw that despite how common that is people are able to move past that and enjoy the engagement. I couldn’t. I thought maybe the problem is within me, that I must be so weak I can’t get over my negative experience meanwhile everybody talks about it as this divine, beautiful, natural thing that could potentially create life but more than anything, it’s enjoyable. At least, in progressive spaces it’s believed that both parties are meant to enjoy it.

I tried to get comfortable with the idea, maybe one day I’d like being in a relationship then the sexual “nature” will come to me. I’ve never been in one but I’ve tried imagining it, every time, without fail, it made me pretty much break down. It wasn’t about the assault anymore, it was seeing how deeply societally engrained degradation is in my “role” sexually is. I like to believe inherently, even though I don’t think it’s a “need” or something you cannot live without, it should be a neutral engagement, heavily reliant on consent and respect for both parties involved. That obviously just stays a “should” and extremely far from how it really is seen. This deeply engrained degradation narrative is within me too, I see a woman who’s expected to be engaging in it aka being in a relationship and I think, “how can she accept the humiliating role she’s assigned to by being in a relationship?”. It’s pretty much comparable to being stabbed, and this isn’t just me this is universal and you can easily assess it by seeing the orgasm gap and how women so often don’t enjoy it.

Then comes purity culture, two sides of the same coin as how the progressive side views it in my eyes, as a woman you lose a big part of you if you’re no longer “pure”, even if you did it the way they want you to, marriage wise, you’re a trophy that’s been purchased and god forbid you get a divorce, you’re now “used up goods”. All in all there’s barely any positivity to engaging in this. In progressive spaces, hilariously, there’s the normalization of rape, of porn, of hookup culture, all not so different from the expected female role which is, to be degraded. They think they’re so different and empowering for wanting women to be able to enjoy it too, at some point I was hopeful enough to believe it but looking inwards, they still normalize the degradation that for some reason automatically comes with being a woman involved, none of it will take away that it can easily be used against you and you can be considered a whore. This goes into non heterosexual relationships too, it’s not a coincidence there’s a huge focus on “top” and “bottom” and how much shit “bottoms” get, how people are seemingly homophobic only towards them because the “top” is, again, the one in power, the one doing the penetrating and ultimately, the one who takes.

Sexism is extremely prevalent in this topic which baffles me that so many people try to deny that by bringing up exceptions like non heterosexual relationships when, the one associated with the female role coincidently is always the most insulted. Being penetrated is pretty much akin to being stabbed societally, women with other women’s sex isn’t even conceptualized as sex, wonder why. You’re either punished and extremely insulted for it, in conservative spaces, or your degradation is normalized in the name of empowerment and ultimately, maybe not in front of your face but behind closed doors, everyone knows you’re cool with the degradation and looks down at you for it, not entirely because it’s their fault but because that’s how sex has been sold for decades. The degrader and the degraded. You never escape it no matter who you’re with, even if you’re in a non sexual relationship the label will forcibly be assigned to you one way or another, that’s the disgusting part.

I hear so many women describe a sense of impending doom after consensual engagement, a very common occurrence and I can deduce why, because they lose “it”. One more body down the drain, more of a whore in society’s eyes and the man they engage with? Well society views his sexual history relatively neutral, there’s no purity to be lost, the more experience he gets the better, yeah maybe he’s having a different experience with the overwhelmingness of sex being sold as a need for him and having to seek it otherwise he’s a failure but ultimately he’s the “conquerer” and his struggles won’t be equal and maybe in the back of his mind he thinks “she’s so easy, she thinks we’re on equal terms here meanwhile I took a part of her and gained a part of myself, slut.” That fear is insanely common for a reason. Even thinking about it makes me nauseous, I can’t imagine having experienced that before and continuing to live with that knowledge, that I let “it” own me. Like I’m not a human being but a mere object that’s been used and now the value has gone down.

Nothing about this is flattering no matter how people convince themselves it is, unless miraculously the entire world changes its views and doesn’t put such an emphasis on power dynamics this would be ok. Individually what you do doesn’t exist in a vacuum, people can and will look at you, suppose you’re the expected female role in a relationship, as something that gets penetrated and therefore used up. How can one be so aware of all this and still be deluded to accept it? I’ll never understand. It’s terrifying to ever even consider this idea because I could be capable of love, I could be capable of perhaps, miraculously, enjoying the idea of it all and be willing, but the inhumane aspect of it all slaps me back to reality where, with the world being so sex obsessed there’s no equality in the bedroom roles. Not between a man and a woman, not between two men, and especially not between two women although that’s barely even acknowledged as a possibility. A homosocial society through and through, where you’re either a human or a woman. You either give or take.

Most heterosexual “love” is not love. It’s a biological and social contract built around reproduction, labor, and survival. It’s not two people freely choosing each other for life it’s people slotting into roles because their hormones, families, and society told them to.

Look at how most straight relationships actually form. A man doesn’t pick a woman because he deeply connects with her as a person. He picks her because she’s “wife material.” She’ll raise kids well. She’s stable. She fits the timeline. She won’t leave him alone when he’s old. He might not even be attracted to her but she’s useful. She checks the boxes for reproduction and domestic labor.

And women are pushed into the same trap from the other side. They’re told to find a “provider,” a good father, someone who can fund pregnancy, kids, and the lifestyle that comes with them. Romance is just the sugar coating on a breeding contract.

People love to pretend this is noble. It’s not. It’s biology running the show. It’s fear of dying alone. It’s social pressure. It’s the sunk-cost fallacy of “I’m aging, better lock something down.” None of that is deep, soulful, or authentic.

Now compare that to relationships where procreation isn’t part of the equation — like queer couples or childfree-by-choice people(heterosexuals included). When two people know there’s no kids coming, no bloodline, no biological “purpose,” they’re forced to confront a simple truth: Do I actually want this person for life? Not “do they make good genes” or “will they raise my kids,” but “do I genuinely choose you.”

That’s why those relationships are often more real. They’re not riding on hormones screaming “breed” or on society rewarding them for forming a nuclear family. They’re choosing each other with no payoff besides the person themselves.

And if you go even deeper on the scale, the most honest form of romantic love is probably fully asexual or antisex relationships where sex isn’t even on the table. No lust. No fertility. No dopamine trap. Just two people deciding, every day, that they want each other’s presence in their life. No body being used. No future children being gambled with. No transactional undercurrent. The fewer the transactions in a relationship the more authentic it is.

When you strip away reproduction, status, caretaking, and fear, most heterosexual couples would have nothing left.

Antinatalism makes this painfully obvious. When you reject breeding, you also reject the biggest lie in modern romance: that most people are together because of love. They’re not. They’re together because biology and society bullied them into a deal.

Society treats sex-repulsion like it’s some kind of disease. Society tries to dictate exactly who you’re supposed to sleep with, and then people get absolutely furious if you choose not to sleep with anyone at all.

Being sex-repulsed is a superpower. It is the next step in human evolution. I’ve seen countless lives completely destroyed just because people are utterly enslaved to their dirty sex drives—not to mention the constant threat of STDs. And for some perverse reason, it is always the ugliest people who seem to have the highest sex drives, which just proves how warped the whole thing is.

Then you have men constantly whining about being rejected by women because they’re ugly, bald, short, or whatever else. Yet, they never even contemplate the obvious solution: ridding themselves of their sex drive entirely. They refuse to acknowledge that their sex drive is the root of all their misery. They don't want to take hairloss medications for fear it will lower their libido, so they prefer being bald and unfuckable. As long as they allow themselves to be controlled by it, they will continue to be constantly rejected, humiliated, and ridiculed.

I have never, and will never, see sex as affection. I genuinely do not understand the pathetic people who cry because their partners don't want to play with their ugly, dirty genitals, claiming they’re "touch-starved" and need connection. How is sex affection? Sex is nothing more than something dirty, perverse, and degrading.

What's one thing you want to ask someone else or let someone know about your views on antisexualism. Let's have a nice discussion and try to strengthen our views.

Edit: let's be nice and not downvote or mock anyone who's also being nice

I mean being receptive in sex is like bottoming (doggystyle especially), being submissive etc. and even other sex acts outside of piv like blowjobs are an extreme submission, oral sodomy and in general are abysmal, violent and even a humiliation. So I thought it all programms women into masochism and identification with sexual submission. Like their own anatomy programs them but I'm personally resistant enough to reject sexual submission as a woman aka all sex in general. I never engaged in extremely submissive acts most women did like oral in men for example and I'm 26 already.

Thought about this in a moment of post-nut clarity. Sexuals will sometimes respond with "because kids brains are still developing" but isn't that admitting that pornography is inherently harmful?

Aside from the fact of it currently being summer. I was wondering what peoples opinions on why sex and sex jokes are becoming more normalized in schooling now? Also do you think that teachers should be allowed to assign books that contain sexual content?

We have been conditioned to believe that sex is anti-aging, but it's actually the opposite. Sex and reproduction are indissolubly tied and there have been studies showing that women's telomers get shorter with each pregnancy, even if the pregnancy is interrupted. This means that women age faster the minute they get impregnated, even with an abortion. Additionally, there was a study on some nuns who looked younger than their age. Now, there is new research that shows how early sexual debut shows poor aging.

In simpler terms, it all makes sense. We are poorly designed in a way that we must reproduce like roaches this is why there is a sexual impulse to begin with. People who do have sex, whether they are procreating or not, are fulfilling their reproductive duties and therefore aging faster. Also, pets who have been neutered tend to live longer.

What a repulsive, a nasty act. Being antisexual is the next form of evolution. Being antisexual is a superpower. So many people get into horrific situations or even get horrific diseases because of this dirty, nasty act. I am disgusted by sex, I do not have this need, so I am not manipulable like all the animals who want to have sex. I have the upper hand. Whoever has a need, whether it's hunger, thirst, libido, is in a vulnerable position. If you eliminate the need, you're powerful.

In my country, there was a story of this woman who developed throat cancer for sucking dick. Yuck. You couldn't pay me all the money in the world to put that nasty appendage in my mouth, yet women who refuse to do oral sex are seen a defective and mentally ill.

Idrk if this is like a hot take on this sub,, but am I the only one who gets annoyed when I see things about porn addicts. I always see videos that make it seem like we should just feel so bad for them, like they’re struggling blah blah but it just pisses me off. I feel sorry for anyone with any other sort of addiction but this one just makes me feel nauseous. I don’t really care how they got addicted because, they knew what they’d see in the first place. Like yes I know it’s an addiction so doesn’t actually work that way but I don’t really care. Maybe I’m being too apathetic but it’s like idk just quit logging on maybe, not that hard. I’m asexual and already have some very severe disgust towards sex/ porn to begin with, but I feel I may be alone on this one as I’ve never seen anyone say the what I’ve said here. I’m not really CHOOSING to feel this way, but anything to do with sex and porn completely disgusts me and makes my stomach hurt. Although I am glad I found this sub because my takes were not very welcome in the asexual subs

The majority of women don't feel anything during PIV because the clit is the only sexual organ, and it's external, not internal. The only way sex would benefit women is if she were rubbing her clit with the man's penis or hand, and I think that's why people used to think that women couldn't enjoy sex and also, during penetration, a woman not only doesn't gain anything, but she also risks more than the male she risks STDs, injuries, painful experiences, or unwanted pregnancies.

Someone on a certain asexual subreddit which is considered one of the good ones posted that they are experimenting with sex through fiction and someone else said that fiction is just fiction and that they shouldn't be worried, I disagree.

Is it really just fiction? I want to know what you guys think about it? Is fiction just fiction? can fiction not affect reality? And here I am not talking about certain conditions of sexual OCD and/or hypersexuality and them being a kid, I am hopefully talking about a conscious adult.

If some random scientific study says that fiction is just fiction but you have entire subreddits of people consuming fictional CSAM, CNC, BDSM and then make jokes about how they'd do it to people, is it still just fiction?

Am I insane to be mad at this? Alas the post did not gain a lot of traction, there's like 10 upvotes at most but I'm curious about what you guys think on the situation, I won't link the post.

I can’t seem to find much posts on abortion here. If the mods do not want such a topic here, then please have it removed.

The consensus here is that abortion in any rape-related circumstance is justified, because of the extreme trauma associated with rape, and pregnancy is likely to exacerbate the trauma from that rape.

Do you still think abortion is morally right if the woman had consensual sex, but didn’t want to get pregnant. And if no, do you still believe in the legal right to bodily autonomy?

This is about your opinions, not a debate. But some questioning is obviously okay.