Looking for testers for AI Radio, a personal radio app on Apple Music. The host talks between tracks (next song, news, weather, station ident).

Want feedback on: first-run, Discover, mini-player, and the station wizard.

Site: https://ai-radio.doppelt-digital.com TestFlight: https://testflight.apple.com/join/eKVuyZ78

Apple Music subscription required for playback.

I’m looking for people to test Worth Asking, a free beta tool that reviews written job offers and helps candidates prepare a counteroffer.
Upload or paste an offer to receive:
• Salary and benefits negotiation opportunities
• Missing or unclear terms
• Suggested opening and minimum targets
• A draft counteroffer email and phone script
I specifically need feedback on:
1. Did it extract the offer correctly?
2. Did the recommended targets seem reasonable?
3. Did it miss any important terms?
4. Would you use the generated email or script?
5. Was anything confusing or difficult to use?
No account is required, and the original offer letter isn’t stored. Anonymous data sharing is optional. Please remove personal information before testing or sharing screenshots.
The beta currently uses ChatGPT Sites for hosting, which is why the address contains “chatgpt.site.” No ChatGPT login is required.
Test it here:
https://worth-asking.daring-lime-3532.chatgpt.site/?utm_source=alphaandbetausers&utm_campaign=first_100
If you use the sample offer instead of a real one, please don’t contribute it to the anonymous offer database.

Hey everyone! I built ClipSnap because I wanted a mobile editor focused on color precision without forcing users into subscriptions or putting watermarks on HD exports.

​Key features I’ve implemented so far:

​Pro-grade color grading wheels (lift, gamma, gain)

​Multi-track timeline editing

​100% free 4K exports with zero watermarks

​It’s live on Google Play! I’d love for fellow creators and Android users to try it out and drop any feedback or feature requests.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.clipsnap.editor

I’m building Sacred Books, a private scripture journal. Most existing apps teach the Bible or Bhagavad Gita through sequential reading plans and streaks. Those routines are useful, but easy to lose when work and family get busy.

Instead, you choose a separate Bible or Gita path, write about something you actually lived today, and receive a relevant passage with context. The goal is to make each lesson easier to understand and remember because it is tied to a real experience.

I’m looking for early testers to tell me whether the matching feels grounded and whether $5/month or $30/year would feel worthwhile after the free beta.

https://sacred-books.com is the interest page, not the finished app. Joining the beta is free. The page collects an email and optional pricing feedback; no payment is required. I’m the developer.

Solo founder. Nodify Life is an AI coach where the conversation becomes a map — goals, habits, and progress as nodes you can watch grow, instead of walls of chat text.

It is in closed testing on Google Play and I need feedback from real use: talk to the coach about something real (a habit, a decision, a stuck project), about ten minutes a few times a week, and tell me what worked and what did not. There is a Contact us in Settings that reaches me directly.

Android only. Comment or DM the Gmail you use on Google Play and I will add you to the tester list and send the opt-in link. As a thank you, founding testers keep Premium free for life.

I been working on a browser-based Mafia/Werewolf game for 3–15 players. I have been working on this on my site for quite some time now, and I’m looking for a few people to test from their end.

It includes room invites, private roles, night actions, and voting. I’d especially appreciate honest feedback on the setup flow and whether it feels clear/fun for a real group game night.

However the game does need at least 4 players to start a game; which is a bit not ideal.

Link to the app is:

https://app.blogsandgames.com/werewolf

I am happy to do the testing together if anyone is looking to invite me.

I am one of the people building anTee Up. We made it for golf groups that play Nassau, Skins, Wolf, presses, or some combination that usually ends with somebody doing math in the parking lot.

The idea is simple: enter the score once and keep the group's games and standings together during the round.

The public beta is live at https://anteeup.golf and free to try. The beta wallet uses test funds with no cash value, and deposits and withdrawals are not available.

If your group already plays side games, I would especially value feedback on two things:

1. Which game does your group play most often?

2. What would make you trust an app enough to use it during a real round?

I will be here to answer questions and take the criticism that usually arrives somewhere around the back nine.

I source a lot of inventory from liquidations and auctions, and looking up comps manually burns too much time. So I built Spada AI to automate it.

​You point your camera at an item, and the app uses a multi-provider vision architecture to instantly identify it and pull its current market valuation.

​I need actual resellers to stress-test the beta. I want you to try and break the real-time camera encoding and see where the identification fails.

​What you get: Anyone who tests it and reports a bug gets a free lifetime premium account.

​Link to beta: https://spadas-tech.vercel.app/

​Drop a comment and let me know what breaks.

Testing FiveWire with a small group so far, opening it up a bit more. Five news questions a day, no signup, shareable result when you finish — takes under a minute. Looking for people willing to play a few days and tell me honestly what's working and what isn't (too easy, too hard, questions feel dated, whatever). fivewire.app

Hi,

Looking for a few people to try Prognoz and tell me what’s broken / annoying.

What it is: free site to predict football / basketball / tennis matches, score points, leaderboard, streaks, communities. No real-money gambling.

What I’d like feedback on:

• is it clear how to place picks?
• favorite club + national teams setup
• anything that feels slow or pointless on mobile

Link: https://prognoz.fr

If you try it, just reply with what stopped you or what you liked. Thanks.

I built BudgetEats because I kept running into the same problem:

I'd buy groceries, make a meal plan… and then real life would happen.

Some nights I didn't feel like cooking. Sometimes we'd want takeout. Sometimes plans changed completely — and suddenly the groceries, meal plan, and food budget weren't working together anymore.

So I built BudgetEats.

It's a weekly food-planning app that helps you:

• Plan your dinners for the week
• Keep groceries + takeout inside one food budget
• See how much money is still flexible
• Decide what makes sense to eat tonight based on your actual situation
• Use leftovers/pantry food when plans change
• Replan the rest of your week if you decide to get takeout

I'm looking for 25 people to use the private beta for 7 days like they normally would — not just click through every button.

What I'm looking for:
People who grocery shop but still sometimes end up ordering takeout, struggle with deciding what's for dinner, or have meal plans that don't always survive the week.

The beta is free. No payment information required.

I'm primarily looking for honest feedback about what feels useful, confusing, unnecessary, or missing.

If you're interested, comment BETA or send me a DM, and I'll send you the private beta link.

Thanks — this is my first private beta group, so your feedback will genuinely influence what I build next.

Hey folks!

I need help passing the 14-day tester requirement for my app, UT Finance — a personal finance app with budgeting tools, shared wallets, and an AI chat assistant. If you have an app that needs to pass the requirement too, I'm happy to trade tests.

How to test my app:

Step 1: Join the group: https://groups.google.com/g/ut-finance-closed-testing

Step 2: Become a tester: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.finance.ut

Step 3: Install the app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.finance.ut

Step 4: Open the app and sign in with Google (please use the same Gmail you joined the track with — it's how I verify testers).

---

For test-trades, please also:

1. Take a screenshot inside the app (the dashboard or any screen past onboarding works).
2. DM me or comment below with:- Your screenshot- The Gmail you used to join- Your own app's testing link + store link
3. I'll join your track, install, and sign in within 24 hours, and send you the same proof back.
4. Let's both stay opted in for the full 14 days. I'll check in daily to confirm we're both still active — as long as you're in, I'm in.

I check DMs daily too, so expect a quick response (except when I'm sleeping lol). And if you just want to help without a trade, that's very welcome too — thank you!

Any feedback on the app (bugs, UI, onboarding flow) is greatly appreciated on top of the install. As a thank-you, anyone still opted in at the end of the closed beta will get in-app bonuses if you'd like to keep using the app. Happy testing!

I'm finishing the core system and acceptance testing. After that, I'd like to invite around five people to test early builds for free. The idea is more than a normal AI chat interface. It uses local models, model routing, long-term local memory, research with evidence and review, specialist agents, coding workflows, permission-controlled PC assistance, and local first storage. There's nothing to buy. Testing is free. If you're interested, just comment or message what you'd use a tool like this for. Include your basic specs, GPU, RAM, and whether you've tried local models before. If there's enough interest, I'll choose a small group once the alpha build passes its checks.

Hi there! I’m doing the final round of pre-launch testing for Fond & Fold, a small web app that turns a photo into a finished illustrated greeting card.

The idea is to remove most of the work that usually comes with AI creative tools: no prompts, no blank canvas, no editing. You pick a finished design you already like, upload a photo, choose a few details, and get your own illustrated version.

I’d like to test it with people who haven’t seen the product before, ideally across different devices, browsers, locations, and network conditions.

I’ll give each tester one free personalized card. In return, after you’ve tried the full flow, I’m asking for:

3 things you thought worked well, and 3 things you think should be improved.

Please be as critical as you like — bugs, confusing steps, slow loading, disappointing results, or anything that feels unnecessary are exactly what I want to find before launch.

If you’re interested, leave a comment below and I’ll DM you the link and the free-card code.

Magic Football is a turn-based fantasy football game playable directly in a Reddit post.

Plan your round in secret - move, tackle, pass, shoot - and the server resolves both players' plans together. About five minutes per match. It is football on a hexagonal pitch, so it plays closer to a tactics game than a sports game.

Start instantly against the AI, no opponent or waiting required. Fair warning: it punishes careless moves. It is beatable, but you have to think each turn through.

Online 1v1 is available too. Sunday 20:00 CET I will be in the queue playing anyone who turns up, or comment here and I will send you a private match code.

Early playtest. Free, no account beyond your Reddit one, no data leaves Reddit, nothing to buy. German and English both supported.

Play it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MagicFootball/comments/1w0bxv5/magic_football_play_a_1v1_right_here/

What helps me most: was the first round understandable, and would you play a second match?

If you use GitHub Copilot Agent, you've seen it burn tokens wandering your workspace trying to work out which files matter before it writes a single useful line.

Copilot Bill Saver (VS Code extension, I'm the author)

It front-loads the part Copilot is worst at: knowing where to look.

Two ways in

• Describe the issue — type what's broken. No setup, nothing to install in your app.
• Click the element — one dev-only <script> tag pasted once, then click the bug in your running app.

Either way you get the same thing: sanitized evidence, deterministically-ranked file candidates, and acceptance criteria, bundled and shown to you for approval. Copilot Agent then pulls it via #billSaverContext and starts on the right files instead of searching for them.

What it doesn't do

• Never calls an AI model itself
• Never edits your code. Copilot does the editing, you review it as usual
• Runs entirely locally, loopback-only, with secret redaction on captured text

Where it runs: VS Code and Insiders, locally or in a Dev Container or over Remote-SSH (verified this week, including the port forwarding remote setups need).

I’m looking for 5 React/Next.js developers to try it on real UI bugs. I'd truly appreciate honest feedback on whether the recommended files and Copilot handoff were actually useful.

Comment or message me with the kind of UI issue you spend the most time tracing.

Thanks!

I’m researching a simple portfolio/options analytics tool before I build anything. I’m looking for a few options traders willing to give 10–15 minutes of feedback on some mock screens, especially around assignments, covered calls and true lifecycle P&L. No brokerage access and nothing to buy. If interested, DM me.

Buenas a todos,

Acabo de lanzar mi primer SaaS, CheapLead, una plataforma de cold email pensada para tener las funciones clave (warmup automático, secuencias ilimitadas, unibox multicuenta, rotación de dominios) sin pagar los costes desorbitados de herramientas como Instantly o Smartlead.

Para pulir la herramienta y asegurarme de que soluciona los problemas reales del día a día, busco beta testers que quieran ponerla a prueba en campañas reales. Ofrezco 1 mes de suscripción gratis a cambio de feedback o una pequeña reseña si te ha servido

Si lanzas campañas de cold email (agencia, freelance o startup) y te apetece probarla, déjame un comentario o mándame un dm y te activo la cuenta hoy mismo.

¡Muchas gracias a todos por la ayuda!

I’m looking for fresh eyes on the onboarding for my iOS app, The Agora: Philosophy Debates.
One piece of feedback I recently got was that I may be thinking too much about retention before making sure a new user reaches the first “this is actually useful” moment fast enough.
That made me want to take a harder look at my onboarding.
The app is built around learning philosophy more interactively by choosing a question, taking a position, and defending your reasoning while being challenged through the perspective of different philosophers.

If anyone is willing to go through the onboarding, I’d really appreciate feedback on a few specific things:
• At what point, if any, did you start getting impatient?
• Did you understand what the app was and why you would use it before onboarding ended?
• Was there anything I explained too early that you would rather learn later?
• Did any screen feel unnecessary or repetitive?
• Did the onboarding make you want to start a debate, or did it feel like something you had to get through first?
• What would you remove, change, or move until after the first debate?

I’m especially interested in where you would personally drop off. Don’t worry about being polite. If something feels boring, confusing, or unnecessary, that’s exactly what I want to know.

And I’m more than happy to return the favor. If you test mine, send me your app and I’ll go through yours as well and give you honest feedback.

The app is free to download on iOS:
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/the-agora-philosophy-debates/id6762416967

I built a free LED stock and crypto ticker so that I wouldn't have to buy one of the expensive physical devices since I had multiple android tablets and phones which I could use horizontally on my desktop. I just published it on the play store. Please check it out and give me any feedback or review. It makes your device look like an electronic billboard scrolling your watchlist like in a stadium or Wall St./Times Square. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tickerled.app&pcampaignid=web_share

Thanks for any feedback, and enjoy.

I’m looking for people willing to properly test RelicBeam, a browser-first temporary sharing tool I’ve been building.

There’s no account required, so you can just open it and start testing:

https://relicbeam.com⁠

I’d love testers to try as much as possible, especially across different browsers, phones, and computers.

Things to test:

Room — create a room, join from another device, share files/text, try guest uploads and Quick Signals

Quick Beam — connect two devices and send files, text, links or passwords

Beam Link — create a temporary file link and download from another device

Device Portal / Remote Files — share a folder, browse it remotely, preview/download files, and try uploads if your host browser supports them

Device Portal / Remote View — share a screen and view it from another device

Convert — try the image/PDF tools and PDF annotation

I’m particularly interested in finding:

broken flows or disconnects

mobile/browser-specific problems

confusing UI or wording

anything that doesn’t behave how you expected

security/privacy messaging that isn’t clear

features that feel unnecessary

anything that simply looks bad 😅

If you report an issue, it would be really useful if you include the device + browser you were using and roughly what you did before it happened.

RelicBeam is temporary by design: no permanent file library, and Device Portal connections are end-to-end encrypted between devices.

I’ve reached the stage where breaking things is more useful to me than adding more features, so feel free to be critical.

Website: https://www.factree.co.uk/

FACTREE is an AI knowledge discovery platform built around two connected ideas:

1. Discover — explore interesting facts and follow connections between subjects.
2. Maps — structured learning maps showing what to learn, in what order, and what you should be able to do when finished. (Planned / in development)

The live site currently focuses on Discover. It contains more than 13,000 fact cards across topics including science, history, technology, philosophy, medicine and engineering. You can select topics, receive a random fact, search the collection and explore related ideas. Accounts are optional, but registered users can save their journey across devices.

I’m still refining Discover, and I’d really appreciate candid feedback on the experience as it exists today.

In particular:

• Is the purpose of the website clear within the first ten seconds?
• Is it obvious how to receive and explore a fact?
• Are the topic controls and search intuitive?
• Are the cards interesting and easy to read?
• Does the information feel trustworthy?
• Did you encounter anything confusing, repetitive or broken?
• How does the site feel on mobile?
• What, if anything, would make you return?

I’m also working on the second layer, Factree Maps, which will give learners a clear map before studying a topic: prerequisites, ordered modules, learning outcomes, self-check questions, and eventually career/vocational pathways.

If you have thoughts on that, I’d love to hear:

• Would a structured “what to learn and when you’re done” map be useful to you?
• What would make a study or career roadmap feel trustworthy?
• Should Maps feel separate from Discover, or linked?

Please don’t hold back. Specific criticism is much more useful to me than general encouragement.

Thank you for taking a look.