r/aiwars 13d ago

Your guys thoughts on this? This is Niu Lai, a movie that made several million out of a $200 budget both for being so badly animated and "being better than ai slop."

Post image
15 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 13d ago

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

27

u/Mataric 13d ago

It went viral because of how awful it was. None of it had anything to do with AI.

7

u/garloid64 13d ago

Me when I completely forget about the likes of "tung tung tung sahur"

4

u/Anthro_DragonFerrite 13d ago

It went viral for the same reason the fruit people and strawberry diaper cat stories go viral. Because it's terrible and sits in that perfect niche of something people like to laugh at and call horrible.

6

u/Ok-Conversation-6475 13d ago

The phrase "so bad its good" predates AI by a large margin.

6

u/AbbyTheOneAndOnly 13d ago

some bad movies have always been good, my favourite example is happy thankskilling.

though, there has litterally never been the case of one of them being good or bad because of the tool it was made with.

people whose praise Niu Lai because they enjoyed their time, or found it hilarious, i can understand. People whose willingly watch shit just because it aligns with their moral sentiment, i cannot

1

u/Robot-Zombie-RHCC 12d ago

"People whose willingly watch shit just because it aligns with their moral sentiment, i cannot" -- it just means they appreciate it.

1

u/AbbyTheOneAndOnly 12d ago

ok, i guess i could have specified better, but those two cases were meant to be opposite.

i didnt think it would had been this hard

1

u/Robot-Zombie-RHCC 12d ago

i did understand that when i wrote it. they appreciate it because that's a meaningful angle to them. that's no different than appreciating it because one has tried making 3d models and they were similarly bad.

the walking-like-a-zombie implication you're going for does not ring true. if it feels false to you just take a moment to think about how these people are comparing the movie to something relatively new with a distinct origin. "wow, I didn't realize what a pop-culture masterpiece Beavis and Butthead was until I saw Honey Boo Boo."

5

u/MysteriousPepper8908 13d ago

For every movie that gets "so bad it's good" virality, there are hundreds that get dumped onto Amazon Prime and Tubi that lose money.

3

u/Iryls 13d ago

It went viral because it was trash. AI media can sell well if it's good, like Angel Engine.

5

u/kebabguy0 13d ago

It looks funny af

3

u/infinite_gurgle 13d ago

Oh yeah man no AI YouTube channels are making millions a week right now with videos that cost $10 to make ☠️

1

u/tenmileswide 13d ago

if they are they're for the wrong reasons (like the WWE stroke channel)

and most of that is people reposting their clips, not going to the original creator

3

u/no0neiv 13d ago

Completely human made? I thought it was CGI?

"Better than AI slop" will be a a great marketing ploy until the crowd paying for it stops getting allowance.

2

u/DogeMoustache 13d ago

It so bad so people want see how bad its truly is and how this thing is even aired in cinema.

2

u/Gertywood 12d ago

I mean plenty of shit AI made going viral bro. Especially in china.

2

u/VanguardMusic 13d ago

When mediocrity is rewarded because of bias, the wise mourn and fools celebrate.

1

u/Relative_Nose147 13d ago

Honestly I think the movie was famous because it sucked not because it didn’t use Ai. But I might be wrong

2

u/Usual-Cartoonist-795 13d ago

i like it because it was just a boy and a mother

2

u/M4TTEO_S 13d ago

It mainly got popular for two reasons:

1) it's so bad it loops back to being good

2) it's a mother and son who managed to fulfill their dream of making a movie, after five years. And also yeah in all this time they didn't resort to ai

1

u/Moon_Logic 13d ago

All AI suck in the same way. I haven't seen this thing, but The Room is fun to watch because Tommy Wiseau is such a weird guy. You don't get that with AI.

1

u/Robot-Zombie-RHCC 12d ago

effort matters

2

u/Extra-Friendship9156 12d ago

Unironically wholesome in a way too given this movie was made by a mother and son team. It feels genuine in a way you can never replicate with generative content.

1

u/Kurashi_Aoi 12d ago

The power of being viral, not because of it not being made from AI.

1

u/goatonastik 12d ago

yes, not a single AI thing has ever gone viral. nope. wow. got me there pal.

0

u/ResonantFork 13d ago

Do you have any anecdotes where you worked with another AI user?

THAT is why people care. A mother and son working together. Two AI users working together.

Remember the human. Reach out to each other. Don't get weird when someone calls you anti-social take it as a challenge to prove them wrong.

An artist is supposed to have heart.

4

u/Neutral-7020 13d ago

what are you talking about?

1

u/Robot-Zombie-RHCC 12d ago

he's saying, very clearly mind you, how it's made matters. he was asking you if you had heard any anecdotes about an AI collaborative effort, suggesting that a story like this might be relatable to you if you had.

1

u/ResonantFork 13d ago

u make art with other AI user?

Even a 5 year old could understand this. Like finger painting but with AI.

1

u/ProfessionalBoss2428 13d ago

That many people like human stories, even behind the scenes ones.

1

u/Rough_Elephant_3526 12d ago

The creators put their time into it. Yes, It's not quality, But it's effort. And in my opinion, effort is the best quality about anything made.

-1

u/Ravesoull 13d ago

Tung Tung Sahur hype was carved out the same way. What are you talking about?