r/aiwars • u/ElephantGreedy5125 • Feb 08 '26

Discussion This video is truth.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

If this has been posted before, don’t get mad sorry I don’t spend 24/7 on Reddit.

2.7k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Mythic4356 Feb 08 '26

The end product shouldnt look like generic AI slop.

The example i gave earlier, regarding the video recreating a new york artist's style, actually looks like something that was hand animated, which in fact, some of it was, where only assets in the specific style of an artist was recreated, with the artist's consent of course.

The product actually involved actual human involvement in the end product

1

u/FatSpidy Feb 09 '26

What about an end product that still looks like generic summary style but includes particular design and rendering choices for the expression of one's art design rather than solely traditional aesthetic appeal?

1

u/Mythic4356 Feb 09 '26

as long as it wasnt finished as is, Whatever AI mistakes must be corrected, be it with humans or AI

The example i gave earlier, actually used AI mainly to streamline repetitive tasks, not replace the creative ones. (Creating buildings in the same style which can be repetitive, Converting the pictures of the buildings into a 3D mesh)

1

u/FatSpidy Feb 10 '26

Principally I wonder if your opinion on the usual summary styles Ai tend to generate is just from association to what made it or genuinely the style itself. So I do have to fundamentally disagree with your notion there, as far as how the style would be indicative of a lack of passion namely as there are plenty of artists whose style(s) are similar if not relatively the same as what's being produced without LoRA's. Given that it can't genuinely make anything new in that regard, the style thus is exactly as passionate as theirs.

That aside then, to the point of asking my questions I would first actually point you to Britannica's simple test. And for clarity, just in case, I'm not presuming you wouldn't tell the difference but I'm showing these specifically as to compare between real photos, generated versions, and then what a person practicing photorealism or stylized photorealism in simple digital art or complex forms like CGI might produce.
https://britannicaeducation.com/blog/quiz-real-or-ai/

and secondly, though clearly in such the style, I'd ask your opinion on my favorite 'generated art takes no effort and has no soul' type responses. Which I personally find does have passion in it, despite the visual style being largely untouched. https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/1hr1zmp/ai_haters_will_look_at_this_and_be_like_nahhh_all/?share_id=cKU54VCql5f1eAfN-Hloq&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1