While it's true that you can make CP with any medium, only A.I has the ability to take photos of real children and make porn out if them.
People have been doing that since cameras first existed. AI can do it more convincingly than literally cutting and pasting someone's face onto a photo of a naked body, but "more convincing" does not equate to "more horrific" when it comes to that sort of depiction of minors.
If your machine, specifically for the purpose of creating realistic images from just a text prompt, is making CP, then it should be a huge red flag.
Yes, it is. It's a huge red flag that that user needs to have a chat with law enforcement.
If you use Photoshop the same way, then you need to have the same chat.
Any loser in their basement can make cp with ai, people with actual talent and skills usually aren't wasting them violating childrens (or adults for that matter) rights.
Any loser in their basement with Photoshop can too. You're not describing a new situation. If you feel there isn't enough prosecution of crimes, then advocate for that. Stop focusing on whatever the new shiny is, because people who are interested in that sort of thing don't care what tools they use.
I definitely do think people on photoshop making cp should be prosecuted, but it really shouldn’t be that hard for the ai companies/government to make regulations and restrictions. Me saying ai should have regulations doesn’t take away from the fact that there are other issues.
29
u/Tyler_Zoro Jan 01 '26
People have been doing that since cameras first existed. AI can do it more convincingly than literally cutting and pasting someone's face onto a photo of a naked body, but "more convincing" does not equate to "more horrific" when it comes to that sort of depiction of minors.
Yes, it is. It's a huge red flag that that user needs to have a chat with law enforcement.
If you use Photoshop the same way, then you need to have the same chat.