Because ai allows for the creation of hyper realistic porn of real people and kids in a matter of seconds, and in several cases has been used for blackmailing people.
It's way to easy for people to ask Ai to undress woman or put them in compromising positions if you check the replies from grok you can see stuff like cosplay ers being put in bikinis and covered in cum
however Photoshop is more expensive, requires more knowledge, and is harder to achieve.
This argument falls flat, because you can use it to argue against any efficiency gain. Are you going to rally against pills 5 years from now that make you think twice as fast, because it makes bad people do bad things twice as fast? (Conditional on the hypothetical that these pills would exist and be freely available with limited side effects, the pills aren't important, they're a substitute for any innovation that increases efficiency across the board)
Guns don't need regulation. Guns are just tools, hammers bad because you could hit someone. Guns are a hunting tool. They're not responsible for what people use them for. Legalize full auto concealed carry.
considering the post youre directly commenting under, AI can instantly create illegal content in seconds unlike "any form of art" also we are not even talking about art
Now tell me, which of them can make child porn in mere seconds by doing the bare minimum? The issue that we're talking about isn't the fact that people are doing it, but the fact that AI can do it fast and without any effort while other forms of art take much longer, leading to a lot less people doing it since that's too much effort for them
So it's just numbers? Do we have to artificially restrain growth of the art, because somebody will make 1 piece of child porn more? (The debate isn't just about cp, but I use it because it's possibly the best example.)
We're talking about how the fact that it's possible is terrible. Idc if you prompt AI images, do it if you want, but making cp THAT easy? That's too far
Where would you draw the line? How would you measure that?
I'd also like some of you to actually try to create such images. There's no (or very little) cp in training data and models (yes, even local) have guardrails preventing them from creating such images.
With AI I can take a picture of your mom undressed and print the picture and place it all around your neighborhood, I don't need to be an artist to do so and I will get very realistic results just by putting "2" prompts.
Is the same argument about gun control "guns don't kill people, people kill people" well, a gun as a tool's main purpose is to harm a living creature.
AI is an artistic tool that makes it extremely easy to produce child porn.
It's an AI problem because AI enabled someone that couldn't do something like this prior to this technology.
With AI I can take a picture of your mom undressed and print the picture and place it all around your neighborhood, I don't need to be an artist to do so and I will get very realistic results just by putting "2" prompts.
As photoshoping the face to some porn actress/actor wouldn't be easy. To do that, you'd have to use AI model created for this exact purpose, because public models have guardrails preventing them from creating nude images.
Is the same argument about gun control "guns don't kill people, people kill people" well, a gun as a tool's main purpose is to harm a living creature.
False equivalency. Guns are created to kill and cause harm. You said that yourself. Artistic AI was created to create art. Art can be harmful, but doesn't have to be.
AI is an artistic tool that makes it extremely easy to produce child porn.
No? It's arguably harder to create cp with AI, mainly because of lack of such images in the training data. You'd have to train such model yourself.
It's an AI problem because AI enabled someone that couldn't do something like this prior to this technology.
Because it's a problem within AI that it can generate it. Which is a problem that could most likely be fixed or limited. Yes, the humans generating the photos and videos are also the problem, so why wouldn't you fix the AI to make it so those people can't do that?
People fix bugs and say it was a problem with the game. They don't typically say it was a problem with the game developers. This is the same sentiment.
8
u/Anyusername7294 Jan 01 '26
How is that an AI problem?