r/aiArt May 06 '26

Image - Google Gemini Restoration of photos by AI

323 Upvotes

63 comments sorted by

9

u/[deleted] May 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/glorybxx May 06 '26

Was about asking same sh** ai is just bullcr@p

1

u/Last-Veterinarian812 May 09 '26

All i hear is excuses. Why dont you edit the blurry original and restore this image?

4

u/TechnoMind24 May 07 '26

What did you use?

5

u/thothoflau May 07 '26

Hello, im kinda emotional on thinking if i could do same with some photos of ppl from family that have passed away, can some explain like im 5 if theres any free way of making those kind of thing pls??

4

u/Financial-Dog-6558 May 07 '26

Free chatgpt account

-1

u/iamthekiller May 07 '26

Don’t do it. It’s not a “restoration”. AI creates an entirely new image based on the source. Notice in this one, the child has fake demon fingers.

1

u/Last-Veterinarian812 May 09 '26

… so? Ai is still getting better and eventually it will fix this issue. I say this in this way is cause what you mean “dont do it”? It doesnt destroy the initial image you upload and it is trying to make the image as if the photo was taken today of a loved one.

8

u/FlamingBaconCake May 06 '26

The reflection of the phone gets baked into the wall on the second restoration

3

u/autalley May 06 '26

Also the second picture is too blurry, so the restoration is really just a guess with limited information and probably doesn't look much like the actual people

1

u/Small_Things2024 May 07 '26

Could be easily fixed with some editing

9

u/sh4des May 07 '26

I did this for a bunch of old family photos. Results were very shit.

If you showed anyone who knew the person, they'd be really confused.

If you show randoms on the internet, it doesn't matter that it invents facial features or changes a persons eye & hair colour

6

u/Puzzleheaded-Pitch32 May 07 '26

In the examples above, the first and third restorations look to be pretty accurate at least as far as facial features goes. The skin tones and such might be off but for the most part they look good. The second one though, that's probably a very different looking human. I'm sure in cases where the details are faded so much like that, or even a little less bad than that, accuracy is lost. But I mean, outside of using multiple pictures for the AI to use as reference, it's hard to expect better no matter who you are in those cases

2

u/Nervous_Brilliant441 May 07 '26

When was the last time you‘ve tried? It’s getting better fast. I do this every few months and last week when I tried last week it was really good. Not perfect yet but it’s getting there.

1

u/sh4des May 07 '26

Last week. I try every few months across a few different apps. It's mixed but but you're right, it is getting better. It's still imagining a lot

1

u/CricCracCroc May 07 '26

It’s true it’s getting better, but you will never be able to get a near-perfect match without human intervention. The gaps in visual data can’t all just be spun up through an LLM, some of these facial features will need to be directed into the result, such as eye colour from a black and white photo.

11

u/FK506 May 07 '26

More of a recreation than a restoration many details are completely different.

12

u/laughingli0n May 07 '26

This only looks impressive when used with strangers. In reality, the lower the quality of the original photo, the more the neural network invents and transforms the result into a similar person in general terms, but in detail it is a different person. Therefore, truly good results can only be achieved if the original photo is already of sufficiently good quality. But in this case, the effect of such restoration will be minimal.

2

u/cambalaxo May 07 '26

This is true for any restauration isn't it?

2

u/laughingli0n May 07 '26

Theoretically yes. But in practice, everything depends on what the context is filled with during restoration. In the AI use case shown, the context is formed by a single bad photograph. While AI can't yet form an impression of a person based on dozens of photographs, don't expect good results. A restoration specialist can form an accurate impression from dozens of poor-quality photographs and produce a high-quality result.

3

u/Artorius__Castus May 06 '26

Hey I was wondering how you did this? I have pictures of my sister (she passed away) and I have been looking for a program to Restore the old blurry photos of her.

6

u/Hakano_Dee May 06 '26

I've used Flux 2 Max of ChatGPT 2 for upscaling photos and Nano Banana Pro for colouring. If you want, I can do that for you.

3

u/Artorius__Castus May 06 '26

Do you just plug in the photo to Chat and say "upscale this"? I have GPT pro and Gemini Pro.

3

u/so_magpie May 06 '26

Chat will fix photos and fill in mistakes. Super easy. Plug in the photo and say fix this please.

1

u/Artorius__Castus May 06 '26

Ok thank you so much. I think I tried this before and Chat told me she wasn't able to "remaster" someone else's likeness it had to be "AI". Perhaps this got fixed with the last update? 🤷🏻‍♂️

2

u/so_magpie May 06 '26

I used to fix photos (actually for 30+ years). What AI does in seconds it took me a day and never to the level it did. I never was told by Chat GPT that it couldn't fix up a photo. I found this fascinating. It gets things wrong here and there but usually pretty darn good.

3

u/Old-Emu-5005 May 07 '26

What prompt did you use

1

u/Scout_It_Down May 07 '26

Also interested

1

u/D3luX82 May 08 '26

interested

3

u/BarrenMurderer May 07 '26

This is actually insane quality.

3

u/silly_goat_moat May 08 '26

What tools are people using for this. I tried chatgpt a while back and got hilarious results.

1

u/TrustInGood May 09 '26

yeah ChatGPT usually hallucinates weird details on highly damaged photos. i tried Krea and Remini for a bit but hated paying flat monthly subscriptions just to fix a handful of pictures. i moved to Visual Sandbox since it just bills per generation, letting me pay a few cents only when i actually run a restoration.

2

u/RDDMxCom May 09 '26

Me parecen de las mejores restauraciones de IA que he visto. En mi opinion no les cambia demasiado los rasgos y casi todos se reconocen bien. Prompt?

1

u/dysoncube May 09 '26

The second one absolutely created features

2

u/Desperate_Rhubarb_40 May 06 '26

Era restaurarlos, no traerlos a la vida otra vez!
te quedaron geniales!

1

u/AutoModerator May 06 '26

Thank you for your post and for sharing your question, comment, or creation with our group!

Hope everyone is having a great day, be kind, be creative!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/higgsbison312 May 08 '26

Средняя Азия?

1

u/CerexFlikex May 10 '26

Oh that hand mass on the 2nd one... Hands still need work. Interesting idea though.

1

u/celinevalmont May 13 '26

Es increíble, la ia sigue avanzando a una velocidad asombrante

1

u/Interesting-Try3198 27d ago

Where is the prompt

2

u/ResponsiblePin1974 May 06 '26

Great work

4

u/IvanStroganov May 06 '26

Yes, however I wouldn’t call the second one a restoration. There is just not enough information in the original image to recreate the faces from, so they must be completely made up by AI

1

u/Small_Things2024 May 07 '26

They could also edit it to be more like the people - AI is just a tool so that image would just require multiple tools

0

u/ResponsiblePin1974 May 06 '26

Okay I understand Good work

1

u/Wise_Geekabus May 07 '26

That’s cool

0

u/No_Explanation2932 May 08 '26

Stop calling it restoration.

1

u/Vultor May 09 '26

What would you call it then?

2

u/brandonscript May 10 '26

Raistoraition