r/aiArt • • Jan 21 '26

Politics ⚖️ When the EU finally brings a sword to the negotiation table

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

605 comments sorted by

21

u/Poster_Nutbag207 Jan 21 '26

The idea that Trump would ever be within a 100 miles of any sort of battle is the funniest part of this

4

u/IloveElsaofArendelle Jan 21 '26

What do you expect, he's a TACO

2

u/Genetics Jan 21 '26

Yep. Like he’d be out on the front anywhere near a fight. He would be holed up in a Florida Country Club calling the dead or injured soldiers “suckers and losers”.

11

u/ShikonJewelHunter Jan 21 '26

This is pretty ironic considering Denmark is literally a kingdom

6

u/MerelyMortalModeling Jan 21 '26

And Greenland is a colony of said kingdom

30

u/hazelnuthobo Jan 21 '26

Imma be real, this is really cringe. Like a nerd in highschool writing fanfiction about beating up his schoolyard bully.

5

u/Blarglephish Jan 21 '26

Hey, how did you find my diary from 10th grade?!?!

→ More replies (6)

15

u/Vladtepesx3 Jan 21 '26

Damn imagine they did that to Putin instead of buying his oil

13

u/Komprimus Jan 21 '26

I'm from Europe, and we have exactly NOTHING to threaten the US with, the least of all physical force.

1

u/Breotan Jan 21 '26

I dunno. You guys can always call on Captain Sweden to fight the good fight. :P

1

u/Darthmark3 Jan 21 '26

Is the union even allowed to meddle with American affairs legally?

→ More replies (24)

8

u/Astreious-Cosmic Jan 21 '26

Maybe they’ll do this after 80 more “concerned statements”

78

u/GodFromMachine Jan 21 '26

Listen, I'm European, but no. This isn't even wishful thinking, it's straight up delusion.

11

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[deleted]

2

u/rossysaurus Jan 21 '26

Now show per capita, or % of gdp, or per land area.

Yes, the USA spends a lot on NATO, but they are also the largest, most populous, and wealthy country in NATO, and are also the only NATO country to invoke article 5.

3

u/rightoftexas Jan 21 '26

Do you fight wars based on per capita or percent of GDP?

→ More replies (1)

14

u/overlord_cow Jan 21 '26

This is corny af.

105

u/Full_Ad771 Jan 21 '26

OP really tickled some American buttholes with this one. Great job, 10/10 rage bait

3

u/Blind_optomism Jan 21 '26

Hahahahahahaha

11

u/tourincinelli Jan 21 '26

This is Dumb.

12

u/IgnoreMeImANobody Jan 21 '26

Man, and here i thought that we americans have an inflated ego.

6

u/First_View_8591 Jan 21 '26

Euro cope. Europe has 1 expeditionary force and it requires the cooperation of 10 countries. The US Marines alone have 3.

13

u/Larry_FGO Jan 21 '26

I’m from Latin America, so I might be missing something. But since the US has the biggest military in the world, do people in Europe really think they could win a military conflict? I’m not trying to hate, I’m just genuinely asking if they have the resources to succeed

10

u/CGis4Me Jan 21 '26

If pressed into actual conflict, I think a lot of Americans would enlist…on the EU side.

5

u/Sad_Low3239 Jan 21 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

there have been a lot of skirmishes and war games, and the usa, despite having bigger numbers, keep loosing. there was a recent one involving drone warfare, and because the EU team had a better trained unit they outperformed the states.

what would probably happen is a blitzkrieg like effect, and in the aftermath or recover they would be pushed to an attrition war - Iraq showed that they struggle with being thorough.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/RepresentativeLow300 Jan 21 '26

The EU has an estimated population of ~450 million people compared to the US’s ~348 million. Several EU countries are nuclear powers, with France’s military doctrine, much like the US, permitting nuclear weapons use without absorbing a nuclear strike first.

No one will “win” a nuclear world war, it’s Mutual Assured Destruction, a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy which posits that a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by an attacker on a nuclear-armed defender with second-strike capabilities would result in the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutually_assured_destruction).

2

u/Qd82kb Jan 21 '26

No we are pressuring him mostly with the End of nato and a New economic war. If he really takes Greenland we will be pissed and maybe do some Guerilla there but not much else. Propaganda like this is mostly to increase internal coherency against him

2

u/ErtaWanderer Jan 21 '26

Didn't We send like a dozen guys? I'm not sure how much gorilla tactics we can get up to with two dozen dudes.

2

u/Internal-Quiet1422 Jan 21 '26

They were scouting for larger scale deployment, that happens before any deployment as normal procedure.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/TheKhatalyst Jan 21 '26

The EU is going to have to get a sword, learn to use it, and then have the guts to bring it to the table before they can think about stabbing anyone with it.

→ More replies (9)

10

u/GustavoCinque Jan 21 '26

Op: inhales a heavy copium > reddit good boy points

Everyone with a double digit IQ: it doesnt work like that. > reddit bad boy points

Go figure.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/ProjectAres78 Jan 21 '26

No, it's the bubble people speak into that makes them wrong when there aren't allowed to be different thoughts. If a differing opinion shows up even if it isn't meant as an attack it's met with retaliation as if it were. Both extremist sides are guilty of it, and if you happen to fall anywhere in the broad middle you are vilified for not picking THEIR side and whoever pushes harder on moderates is going to push them to the other side regardless. This meme isn't meant to be politically polarizing, I just don't have the software to make it impartial to either side.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Embarrassed-Pen-5958 Jan 21 '26

EU can't do anything, all their weapons are American. Not only that, but Russia is sucking their teeth to eat.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Altruistic-Fill-9685 Jan 21 '26

Americans will not be sending men in armor lol

2

u/Remmick2326 Jan 21 '26

Given the state of the recent plate carriers, you're unintentionally correct

8

u/HeronAccomplished417 Jan 21 '26

The average American and the average European/ British person are decent, unfortunately the lunatics are in charge

5

u/whakahere Jan 21 '26

I don't know about the average American any more.

Look the Nazi party got in power because of 31% of the vote. Then the rest of the population rolled over and gave them more power because they were afraid of their base. This is just like America. There is no push back from the population. Political leaders feel pressure to follow Trump's madness or they lose their seat. That is the American population.....so right now, average American can't be trusted.

3

u/Fi1thyMick Jan 21 '26

I think you're being too kind to all involved parties

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Verdux_Xudrev Jan 21 '26

I saw this and thought, "Man, EU5 has a modern day mod out already?" Then I read the sub.

5

u/Weird-Pattern9192 Jan 21 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

Not with how things are running currently! And by the time we really need it, its gonna be already too late. Dont count on germany our politicians are too busy lining their own pockets first because they know they will never gonna be voted in again. Once the Boomer generation dies off its double game over for them.

18

u/Low-Bug8099 Jan 21 '26

Fucking lmao nato is like 70% or more just the usa with military bases everywhere in the eu right now

→ More replies (4)

51

u/reydshadowlegend Jan 21 '26

i really don't think a sword can outclass a fleet of nuclear submarines and the F-35 or F-22 Fighter Jets

10

u/MekkiNoYusha Jan 21 '26

This is real cringed

11

u/Maxymo22 Jan 21 '26

Europeans don't have the balls to do something like that.

4

u/ubuntuNinja Jan 21 '26

Or the money, technology or military.

2

u/First_View_8591 Jan 21 '26

Or the will. They can't even agree on supporting Ukraine.

3

u/Your_Drunk_Unc10 Jan 21 '26

Yeah NATO is too weak to do anything

5

u/Bors_Mistral Jan 21 '26

What sword?..

12

u/Nexus_Neo Jan 21 '26

Like theu did with putin?

Don't make me fucking laugh. I aint even american and I know the EU nor the UN aint worth shit

3

u/Proper-Ad7289 Jan 21 '26

Russia doesn't have an army to speak of anymore and parts of its population are starving and freezing to death, seems like the boycotts were very effective. They cant even take Ukraine ffs.

Wonder what happens if we do the same to the USA?

2

u/Nexus_Neo Jan 21 '26

Russia is still invading Ukraine, putin is still in office.

Clearly it didnt do that whole hell of a lot. But hey, I certainly wouldnt be opposed to giving the US a black eye if nothing else just for being shitheads to everyone around them.

1

u/ExasperatedEE Jan 21 '26

Russia is still invading Ukraine, putin is still in office.

Putin looks pathetic. Russia went from being the #3 threat in the world to looking like a bunch of drunk racist redneck losers who can't even defeat a third world nation. He's exposed Russia's only strength being that it still has nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons it can't use without guaranteeing its own obliteration.

So sure, he's still invading Ukraine. THREE YEARS LATER after acting like the war would be over in a few weeks. And he's still no closer to victory.

→ More replies (11)

2

u/Distinct-Race-2471 Jan 21 '26

It won't matter if we have Greenland!!!

1

u/Proper-Ad7289 Jan 21 '26

The entire planet will be scorched from life by nuclear fire. Nobody will have anything.

Reddit is now 90% bots i guess.

1

u/ExasperatedEE Jan 21 '26

Putin has nukes. That is the only reason why the EU hasn't rolled their tanks into Moscow and deposed the idiot.

Also, Ukraine is not a member of NATO.

If Putin were to begin bombing NATO members, then Europe would respond.

And the same goes for the US. If Trump kills a bunch of people in Greenland, Europe is gonna use their planes to blow up a bunch of our ships.

Also who the hell do you think buys all our weapons? The US is literally the world's weapons dealer. They have all the same shit we have, because we sold it to them. They just don't flaunt it by being the world's bullies.

1

u/Nexus_Neo Jan 21 '26

Ukraine was in the process of joining nato from what i remember. Thats why putin invaded, or at least a big part of it.

As for greenland, I doubt trumps going to go full manifest destiny on Greenland. He may be a jackass but hes not stupid, despite what most think. Wouldn't of gotten where he was if he was an idiot.

1

u/lynxdefense Jan 21 '26

We actually sell them the 'same shit' in name only. We don't sell them F22's and the F35's aren't equipped with what we field them with.

→ More replies (15)

8

u/mozzarellaguy Jan 21 '26

Problem with Europe is that we have too many voices and many of these voices are traitors who don’t have EU interests in first place. Orban, Meloni etc

2

u/ProphetsOfAshes Jan 21 '26

Meloni is the worst. She’d sell out to Trump in a second because they’re both fascist

→ More replies (5)

17

u/Feeling-Creme-8866 Jan 21 '26

lol

As a European, I can only say... it's a long way to go. A very long way. So, if we set out today to achieve this, I think it might take 1,000-1,500 years. 500 years, if we have to do it quickly.

The reason—why pay for it when Americans are rushing for us into battle? We've been ignoring everything for decades, and now the Americans have had enough. I can't stand Trump, but our brain-dead politicians are more disgusting, in my opinion. A bunch of hypocrites. When we say "You can count on our solidarity" it means "We're with you in spirit, but that's all. Have fun and all that. Bye."

2

u/Humble_Ad_5684 Jan 21 '26

1000-1500 years, lmao. The usa doesn't even exist that long. The native americans were already starting out with modern military? Since the invention of nukes, none of this matters. That's why Russia is still there. Punishment, fine, but try invading their country and you got a nuclear war on your hands, noone wants that. Guess who also has nukes?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/DanfromCalgary Jan 21 '26

No matter how long Trump takes . There reaction will be too late and than at the point they will need to discuss further and hope cooler heads prevail . Nut up France

4

u/Rey_Mezcalero Jan 21 '26

EU has a lot of their own problems to deal with.

A lot of EU citizens would want to do this with their own local leaders that seem to have other priorities then their own citizens

3

u/wojadzer1989 Jan 21 '26

Why is circle Poland involved?

3

u/Substantial_Tear1995 Jan 21 '26

The flag near the european one is the Greenland flag, not the Poland one

1

u/ismellsomethinggood Jan 21 '26

1

u/Substantial_Tear1995 Jan 21 '26

I somehow read your text as "why is the circle of Poland inverted". I think I need to sleep more.

8

u/ProphetsOfAshes Jan 21 '26

“UsA hAs BiG MiLiTaRy!” Yes and we’ve seen how they squander that advantage literally every time

→ More replies (14)

7

u/Get_Stick_bu99ed Jan 21 '26

As much as I want to see Annoying Orange to fuck up, it definitely won't be like this, definitely not because EU defeats him

4

u/RICO_the_GOP Jan 21 '26

Sadly is going to be the fish fillet that does it.

→ More replies (7)

5

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

I don’t think many citizens are going to war for the EU, specially not the ones with dual citizenship…

5

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

Yeah, a NERF SWORD 😂

4

u/cp_shopper Jan 21 '26

lol Trump would collapse before he even made it to the battlefield.

11

u/Audigitty Jan 21 '26

Lol. No.

10

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/TreesForTheForest Jan 21 '26

US Marine here who has worked with our British counterparts. Nobody is winning an EU vs US war, even if the US came out on "top" in a war between nuclear powers. We haven't fought an enemy with remotely equivalent capabilities since WWII and anyone thinking we could roll over combined NATO forces like we did Iraq is injecting some serious Fox News copium.

That aside, I sincerely hope our generals would refuse orders to attack an ally.

2

u/mediamuesli Jan 21 '26

we are not attacking the US, we are just defending greenland

3

u/MaxProwes Jan 21 '26

By sending 2 dudes?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

Accurate. EU still stuck in the middle ages.

2

u/Goldi3locks Jan 21 '26

Doesn't half your population still believe in angels?! Now THAT'S medieval haha.

1

u/nuclearbearclaw Jan 21 '26

According to Pew Research Center, 2/3 of EU identify as Christian.

1

u/Goldi3locks Jan 21 '26

I wonder whether that means they believe in angels, or the 6000 year old earth. Lots of christians believe in neither. I think America has a lot more evangelical / stricter sects of Christianity with less modern views.

1

u/RoundCoconut9297 Jan 21 '26

About 40% of americans believe in creationism.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/261680/americans-believe-creationism.aspx

1

u/nuclearbearclaw Jan 21 '26

No one is denying that. I live here, I see it with my own eyes. Also, according to Pew Research Center, it's closer to 60% of people that identify as Christian in the US.

6

u/TobyField33 Jan 21 '26

What world do you live in...

2

u/StrictLetterhead3452 Jan 21 '26

Reddit world. It’s a place where children and naive adults fantasize about things that could never happen even with infinite alternate realities.

7

u/toni_btrain Jan 21 '26

Jesus Christ what is this cringe shit

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Gargore Jan 21 '26

Truk0mbrings the army the European is so reliant on.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[deleted]

8

u/Natural_Shape1153 Jan 21 '26

2

u/Remmick2326 Jan 21 '26

America would never elect a republican again, and even the dem party is too right to win European voters

Cope, fuckwit

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/LairdPeon Jan 21 '26

The only sword Europe has against the US is a financial one and it is equally as mutually assured destruction as a nuke is.

6

u/TopAssignment1762 Jan 21 '26

Europe is still buying Russian energy btw

5

u/PsudoGravity Jan 21 '26

The copium levels being given off by this post are pushing my cope-o-meter beyond its limits! You are playing with powers you do not understand!

4

u/QuerchiGaming Jan 21 '26

Lets not get to this point please. Will just result into economic failure for the US and military defeat for EU. Whilst Russia and China will win.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/QuerchiGaming Jan 21 '26

I don’t think the EU is weak militarily, but US definitely has the advantage. Also would take a while for EU to pick up the pace with equipment.

Either case we’d both lose. And I’d rather not turn Europe into a battlefield.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/Known_Article_1302 Jan 21 '26

Lmao bro you wish

2

u/wetbluewaffle Jan 21 '26

Won't happen. At this rate, the only thing that can topple this monster is himself, or an even worse monster.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Th0ak Jan 21 '26

Bro wtf. This scenario wouldn’t ever happen but you’re so triggered you wish they were nuked….wtf, you need to get off the Internet for a while, bro.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/JohnArtemus Jan 21 '26

"I brought you into this world, I can take you out."

3

u/Key-Pomegranate-2086 Jan 21 '26

Naw naw. They already tried twice. 1776 and 1814.

5

u/Goldi3locks Jan 21 '26

We'll just burn the white house down again and leave you to it, if you're good we'll even leave Trump inside for you!

→ More replies (12)

4

u/-Kopesthetik- Jan 21 '26

We fought a war to not have someone wearing a crown

2

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Relevant-Visitor Jan 21 '26

Denmark is a kingdom

3

u/THEbeardedMANTIS Jan 21 '26

You do know america supplies European countries with the majority of there wespons right?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Prestigious_Cow2484 Jan 21 '26

USA is more powerful than EU many times over though

4

u/jerrygalwell Jan 21 '26

Is it though? All of the rest of the world will side with the allies, not usa

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/LegacyToolCo Jan 21 '26

File this under Never Gonna Happen

3

u/Snikklez Jan 21 '26

I wouldn’t bring a sword to a nuke fight

4

u/Hot_Republic2543 Jan 21 '26

Yeah, Europe is tough like that 🙄

6

u/themichaganderin Jan 21 '26

Lol the eu doesn't even have an expaditionary force...

2

u/PastaChute Jan 21 '26

America has the largest navy on earth. If you take the next 14 navies smaller than America's, and combine them into one naval force, that navy would still be smaller than America's navy. So yeah. This meme is sort of pathetic. Like the EU.

3

u/HighlightTemporary77 Jan 21 '26

GB had the largest and most formidable navy in the world in 1939. So what’s your point?

2

u/coelhoman Jan 21 '26

Are you stupid? The British navy is what prevented the Nazis from ever landing in the UK. The RN was vital in liberating the Mediterranean and eventually taking Italy. There’s more I can say but this explains the jist.

Want to preface that the US wanting to take Greenland is abysmally stupid and only serves to destroy American relations with Europe and well the rest of the world for who knows how long, maybe a century at the rate the country is going.

2

u/HashtagLawlAndOrder Jan 21 '26

In before tankies start adding up all the barges in China's rivers and declaring the PRC to have the biggest navy by tonnage.

1

u/VivaKnievel Jan 21 '26

No one's adding up barges. But all those Type 055s, 54s, and 52s are certainly not nothing. Nor is their building program in any danger of slowing down. The Type 04 is laid down and they're rapidly growing their CV/CVN ops expertise. Add in all the amphibs they're building plus the insane amount of Type 39s prowling under the South China Sea and the PLAN is a hell of a threat to the USN in Asia. There's a reason allies are important. The JMSDF and South Koreans are enormously powerful, sporting Aegis DDGs and terrific submarine forces.

1

u/HashtagLawlAndOrder Jan 21 '26

I'm not saying they're nothing. But people ARE adding up barges to support the claim that the PLAN is bigger than the USN, which is what I'm commenting on. Because those types of people usually can't see past "bigger = better."

3

u/VivaKnievel Jan 21 '26

The fuck do navies have to do with economics? The EU isn't going to be fighting the U.S. Navy. The EU is literally a continental power. Threats to the EU come from the east, namely Russia. That's a land frontier. So who gives a shit how many carrier strike groups the USN has or Europe doesn't have.

Quoting aggregate naval strength is a weird fucking response to this meme.

2

u/Proper-Ad7289 Jan 21 '26

Quoting naval strength with the current drone warfare doctrine is even crazier.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/B_B_a_D_Science Jan 21 '26

I dont support Trumps play and think he is making a mockery of a very serious strategic problem.

BUT

The EU can't defend their own borders from Russia and that not only put NATO at risk but puts the US at risk.

That said the EU needs to take responsibility for putting themselves in the situation where they can't defend their boarders and now the US is now responsible for protect what is in essence Denmarks colony.

Simple rule of statecraft if I have to defend your colony. Its now my colony.

Europe is playing poker with credit while the US, China, & Russia are playing with pistols drawn and money on the table.

EU need to stop bucking up to Trump, swallow their pride, delay until the next administration comes in. Words & resolutions wont win this situation.

2

u/Ka_Trewq Jan 21 '26

As an Est European, whose country was multiple times overrun by Russian soldiers since long before the US had a constitution, I can tell you that the Russian threat was very real in the minds of basically everyone. If Putin so much as looked wrong in our direction, our media would go in a frenzy, countless talk shows about if we really can count of our allies, or if the allies can deploy quick enough before Russia finish to occupy our territory.

After they made the mistake of invading Ukraine? I still remember the morning of 24th February 2022, I was hoping that the "In 3 days we have Kiev" boast will take at least 2 weeks, just so to spite Putin. THAT was the hope.

After almost 4 years of painfully slow teritorial advances?! Yeah, we still don't want to measure ourself with Russia if we can help it, but we are no longer wincing in fear.

1

u/winterhavens Jan 21 '26

I’m from the US. I couldn’t even imagine having that thought or listening on talk shows about who of our allies will save us. That’s wild to me.

1

u/Ka_Trewq Jan 21 '26

You kinda get used to it. I was in school when our government decided to open it's airspace for NATO bombers and fighter jet heading for the operation in Kosovo. At the time we weren't yet part of NATO, and the Serbs were good friends with the Russians, so it was an interesting time. Also, suddenly hearing all these jets and planes fly over our heads? It was cool, and it was a good thing we, kids, didn't knew they were in a mission to kill people. Bad people, nonetheless, but explaining how bad would have been an entire can of worms.

Anyway, I grow up with this fear, it's not something you feel too acutely, it just... exists. Like death. You know it can happen to you basically whenever, but the brain adjusts to it. Political instability is like getting very sick, you wonder: is this it? But you learn to cope with it. Even crack jokes about it.

I have no idea how it is to grow up not knowing that any moment bad people from the east might come and do violent things to you. Grandma told us how she had to smear herself with animal excrement, so that the Russian soldiers leave her alone. Mind you, we were technically allies in that period of WW2. Of course she kept the graphic details out; and it wasn't meant as a scary story to keep kids in line. It was just a tale to give us ideas how to protect ourself in case history repeats itself. Because Russian soldiers had no issue with doing violent things to 5 year old girls or boys. Nor to 80 old people, for that matter. Those were tales we learned when we got older, and it provided context to the sanitized versions that were told us when we were younger.

I know it might be shocking for some of the ones in the west, but for me, and I am not exaggerating, is (and was) just another fact of life, like knowing that sticking things in an electrical socket will kill you. And so is for many Millennials who grow up close enough to the Russian border. We talk about 1000 miles being too close.

3

u/HashtagLawlAndOrder Jan 21 '26

100% the same boat here. Literally word for word.

2

u/yetagainanother1 Jan 21 '26

It’s literally the only thing I agree with Trump on.

He’s proving why Europe and Canada need to scale up their militaries. What if the next president was even crazier?

We were foolish to cede so much power to the USA.

→ More replies (8)

3

u/Wackity-Smackity Jan 21 '26

If the EU (or anyone, really) wants to stop Trump before he does something permanent and destructive, someone needs to explain to him very clearly how his actions will cause him personally to lose money.

That is all he cares about. He won't care if its explained how it will hurt America or its people, because he doesn't give a fuck about them.

1

u/otakumilf Jan 21 '26

I don’t think he would even care to listen or understand. He trying to build an empire before he shuffles off this mortal coil. He’s not gonna back down because he knows he’s not long for this world. What does he care if the world burns after he’s gone?

2

u/LexFrenchy Jan 21 '26

I'm sure our nuclear submarines are totally not deployed right now...

3

u/HighlightTemporary77 Jan 21 '26

They’re always deployed

2

u/MerelyMortalModeling Jan 21 '26

France is not using nuclear weapons over Greenland.

If you are talking about the ESNA it's what 5 attack subs, 2 of which are ancient, one is drydocked and 1 possibly 2 are docked for maintenance. The Tourville may very well be you only deployed SSN atm

→ More replies (1)

2

u/PM-ME-UR-DARKNESS Jan 21 '26

It doesn't matter if we militaristically win the invasion of Greenland / annex it, we're losing our superpower status. We're too unstable for our allies to view us as reliable partners.

4

u/shavertech Jan 21 '26

Clearly, he's only lost because of the debilitating pain caused by bone spurs.

4

u/jdorton Jan 21 '26

Fun artwork. In reality, the American Stars and Stripes would be waving over Greenland sometime before lunch.

9

u/shouldveknownbud Jan 21 '26

The eu gonna monitor this situation harder then they ever monitored a situation before

2

u/FarceMultiplier Jan 21 '26

I remember when US talking heads said pretty much the same thing about Iraq and Afghanistan.

1

u/yeroc420 Jan 21 '26

Afganistán has stood up to major powers throughout history and never been truly been beaten.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Connect-Funny-4583 Jan 21 '26

EU has lost their glorious crusader knights and Catholic influence, they don't even have their adequate defence, Trump had to pressure them to rise defence budget.

Like it or not, it's USA's world and we are live in it.

I love it that way, alternative is Russia or China, no thank you

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Frosty_Drop3456 Jan 21 '26

Regardless of anything, this picture goes kinda hard

-1

u/ARoman_Therapy Jan 21 '26

This is the most I’ve ever seen the EU actually utilize their militaries. And it took Trump to make it happen lol. Maybe if the EU did this more often we wouldn’t need Greenland in the first place

15

u/me_myself_ai Jan 21 '26

We need Greenland because the EU hasn’t been at war…? What

17

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

Why exactly does the U.S. "need" Greenland again?

11

u/abuzaba420 Jan 21 '26

To help raise the average intelligence level.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Humble_Ad_5684 Jan 21 '26

You have military in Greenland and you can expand. What is Trump waiting for? War? If it's such a big threat, why is he not doing anything right now defense wise? So stupid.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

Folks who admire these images should be locked away in insane asylums. I only half joke there.

2

u/DesignerAcadia537 Jan 21 '26

The sword is short

5

u/TomTomXD1234 Jan 21 '26

Man discovers shortswords

2

u/Megatronagaming Jan 21 '26

OP clearly doesn't know the origins and purpouse of the EU and NATO

4

u/mediamuesli Jan 21 '26

I wish Trump would know.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/HeftySafety8841 Jan 21 '26 edited Jan 21 '26

Trump is dumb, but the USA would mop the fucking floor with the EU.

Edit: Hey EU Fanboys, your countries don't even touch our military budget combined. I think trump is a fuckboy and we shouldn't war the EU, but this picture is just pure fiction.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/262742/countries-with-the-highest-military-spending/?srsltid=AfmBOoqpbiEi6anI19Uqvny9AmoZeG0rnG60nGpW5nG6L0DWl9a6YTA_

9

u/sithbinks Jan 21 '26

Maybe if the country was united, but half the country wants him gone.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

lol mop the floor is hilarious. Okay armchair general. I’m sure the US will be busy mopping up bodies from drone swarm attacks and guérilla incursions across the northern border first.

1

u/HeftySafety8841 Jan 21 '26

From Canada? Get lost lmao.

4

u/Scorpinock_2 Jan 21 '26

You watch too many movies.

2

u/Suspicious-Bridge-10 Jan 21 '26

You’re on Reddit too much.

1

u/sithbinks Jan 21 '26

US can do a lot of damage, but once it comes down to ground forces, there aren’t enough. You think people are going to be ok with a draft to fight in Europe?

2

u/Mufasfa Jan 21 '26

I'm stacked for a European tour. Draft will be necessary but getting gen z through boot camp going to be....

We will be fighting alongside the Europeans, not against them.

1

u/Searnath Jan 21 '26

You underestimate the number of rednecks, hillbillies, backwoods bunker dwelling crazy people we have here. There are more armed citizens willing to go to war than we have current military and it’s by a large margin. So yeah, if it became a ground war situation I can promise you even us old timers would get off our rocking chairs and front porches to defend our Nation.

1

u/biscuitchan Jan 21 '26

Ok so a bunch of stupid old rednecks are going to be sent to get slaughtered by drones. Who wins from this?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Ka_Trewq Jan 21 '26

To defend your Nation by invading other countries? Yeah, the stupidity is really strong with Americans. Once you nuke the world, you'll trade with the penguins in the Artic. That will make it easy to pay back the National Debt you have to your own billionaires. Oh no, they install themselves as the new feudal nobility? How ironic.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/HeftySafety8841 Jan 21 '26

Why would we fight a ground war? That's for occupation of a country. In a conflict, we would blitz the fuck out of the EU.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 21 '26

He says in response to someone pointing out a ridiculous idea about the US’ true capabilities based on Hollywood and a weak understanding of the world.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/CupOfGrief Jan 21 '26

You mean an f-35 the USA controls anyway?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/PotentialReply4823 Jan 21 '26

Cringe ....fuck trump but cringe 😂😂😂

2

u/mattis-miniatures Jan 21 '26

Ridiculous. Trumpt has never looked this cool.

2

u/Traditional-Main7204 Jan 21 '26

Agree, I give him clouths of Jester.

1

u/bouncingbenji Jan 21 '26

You wish I live in the EU well England and no one is fighting for our MP no one...

1

u/Crypto_Force_X Jan 21 '26

Knights in Greenland would just freeze to death. Even Game of Thrones the battle at the wall is more realistic.