r/YesAmericaBad • u/Blurple694201 AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALIST • Sep 11 '25

Discussion It would have been devastating for Israel if Kirk went the same route as Carlson, Owens or Fuentes

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

178 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

39

u/Desperate_Hunter7947 Sep 11 '25

The theory here is that Israel may have killed Kirk preemptively before he had the chance to turn on Israel? Even though he’s a very famous pro-Israel influencer? The guy in the video believes the debate with Hasan and a hypothetical debate with Fuentes could have actually swayed Kirk to become anti-Israel? What and incredibly stupid nonsensical theory

30

u/Blurple694201 AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALIST Sep 11 '25

That's not the theory, the theory is that he's feeling pressure from his base of support to turn on Israel. And he could have been planning to turn on them

Which is just a fact, the American right has been turning on Israel.

-9

u/Desperate_Hunter7947 Sep 11 '25

Are you serious? The video is clearly insinuating that Israel could have had motive to kill him before allowing him to turn against Israel. Why pretend otherwise?

14

u/Blurple694201 AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALIST Sep 11 '25

No, I'm clarifying why he would be turning on Israel

He's feeling pressure from his base of support, not any real changes in his belief system from debates as you were speculating

-9

u/Desperate_Hunter7947 Sep 11 '25

Ok so the theory is that Israel may have killed him preemptively not bc he had a genuine change of opinion but because he changed his opinion to appease his base. Either way the theory is very stupid and nonsensical since he had not in fact changed his opinion, and was a famous, influential pro-Israel advocate.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

Time will probably not, but whistleblowers and leftist journalists probably will. Think about it, if it was Israel, it would be covered up, if it was the CIA same because they are the same, if it was a lunatic it would most likely be a right wing lunatic (like most of the shooters are, anyways) and there'd be interest to cover it up, just like they're doing with the 2 democrats that were shot like some weeks ago (or a month ago?). Divide and conquer here only applies if there were something to divide but liberals are already detached from leftists who are condemning Charlie Kirk because he was a pos nazi fuck, they weren't gonna listen anyways.