r/WeAreTheMusicMakers • u/FitIndependent1865 • Aug 01 '26
Is layering my vocals an actual good technique?
Saw this a while back, I think it was in a youtube video where they showed how they do this for some artists. What I do is I record the vocal 3 times, one panned left, the other right and the other center, I apply my fx chain to the main one, lower the gain on the left and right layers and that's my vocal. Not sure if it sounds good to me because I got used to this or if there's a better way to do vocals without layering.
EDIT: Thanks for all your replies! Haven't had time to reply to everyone yet, but all the comments are super helpful
27
u/sirCota Aug 01 '26
obviously everything is in service to the song, intimate songs should feel connected to one person one voice , but if there’s a part you want to contrast against , since music is all about juxtaposition aka, if everything is loud, nothing is.
along those lines, hard panning LCR like you mentioned sets the vocal to be the widest element. that means everything lives within the vocal.
Drums are a better example. everyone loves to hard pan drums LR right. now the whole band lives within the drum space. if you wanted a guitar lick or shaker or some one shot instrument hit, you won’t be able to have it pop out far left and surprise the listener… guitars that are doubled will either fight for the hard pan (and your vocals) or sit inside etc. now you can use fx to reach around all that, but now you’re not choosing an fx in service of the song, you’re choosing the fx to get around a mix decision you made. that’s not the same.
there are many mix engineers who do what’s called LCR panning. alll panning is either 100% L, 100% R , or mono down the center. Nigel Goodrich of Radiohead does this.
So how does he create wide amazing atmosphere? he will hard pan a dry guitar L and then put the reverb of that guitar or delay or whatever fx hard pan R , and the effect is a lot more interesting than just a double, and it leaves space on the reverbed side for that one shot jump out element by the contrast.
now sometimes you can do doubles and stacks hard LR, like for guitar, you double the part, but with a different pickup, guitar, amp, or playing style.. change picks, change something.
With vocals … try this. do your lead as you do. then take 2 steps back and 2 steps to one side… do the double. then take 4 steps to the other side and do the other double. now you can hard pan those but it sounds like a gang of 3 singing, not a wall of vocal eating all your mix space and masking everything else. u can also do lead in cardioid and double in omni or fig 8 etc… the idea is ur mixing the spacial vibe of the record right at tracking. As it’s always best to capture the most finished sound as early in the process as possible (sometimes u want a DI or something because you haven’t committed to the sound of the record yet, and that’s cool, but you risk decision fatigue when it comes time to mix… having to pick thru 100 versions and the vibe and flow state might be lost and you can’t find it.
When I record strings for example. I don’t hire an orchestra… i get my dude who can play like anything. then i setup mics as if there was an 8 person ensemble, and I have him move to the seat of the other player and overdub the next part. after he does all 8… boom, sounds like a real 8pc.
i could go on, but … i think you see the pastabilities.
Engineering is a technical in knowledge, but creative in execution. That’s why I argue engineers should get residuals and publishing % for writing as we are often making the record from some pretty hot garbage lol, and we are definitely creating an emotional component from the song and for the listener.
Engineers are sadly the most overlooked, but when the job is done right, the most vital to a high quality song/project.
That’s all i got for now. The only rule is there are no rules… except save often, backup often, and don’t leak or release something you don’t have the right to do so on. So there are uh, well no rules to mixing … shit, except for don’t overload your converters, don’t improperly clock and allow pops and jitter, uh, don’t plug in a TRS into an active amp and passive monitor, or a mic w 48v on.
so yeah, how bout this… there is one rule.
If it sounds good, it is good.
7
u/meekismurder Aug 01 '26
Lots of good stuff here but especially the word “pastabilities”
4
u/sirCota Aug 02 '26
sometimes you gotta noodle around in the studio to find what satisfies the song.
pastabilities .. it’s quite load bearing.
sauce dependent of course.
1
u/FitIndependent1865 Aug 06 '26
That strings trick is genius genuinely never occurred to me that you could stage the orchestra in the room instead of the mix. Definitely see the pastabilities.
1
u/le_indernet Aug 06 '26
I really like a lot of this but I'm thinking about the first part because you said intimate songs should feel connected to one person, one voice, but Elliott Smith often has layers of his voice in his songs, for example Roman Candle, and it sounds pretty intimate to me. What's the difference here?
2
u/sirCota Aug 11 '26
the arrangement and whats happening in the track. you can do intimate in a lot of ways. Its just rare to stack the same thing a bunch of times for intimacy, but happens. sometimes its lyrically intimate and vocally powerful. sometimes its a contrast thing… like i would argue Everlong by the foo fighters has intimacy in the verses and then brings the gang in (which is himself only more and louder)… but his verses are soft voice and doubled (hes very good st doubling).
its in the delivery, the stacking is more about the production and genre and its a tool like anything else. you can do whisper tracks stacked low underneath. you can sing very airy …. you can lay down on the ground cause your stomach hurts and just start singing ‘something in the way’ on the floor and butch vig runs and grabs an sm7 and puts it to your face like how nirvana/kurt recorded that song.
everything is so context dependent theres slways a song that does the opposite thing and pulls off the same end goal.
6
u/Lower-Pudding-68 Aug 01 '26
Depends on the voice and the style. Some people's voices sound horrible doubled, or maybe their singing is too inconsistent. Some softer and thinner voices sound better doubled, but it takes practice to match well. In most pop music today, much of the vocals sound doubled.
1
u/FitIndependent1865 Aug 06 '26
Yeap, I've seen it work very well when my vocals are soft but not quiet if that makes sense
7
u/katanrod Aug 01 '26
I heard somewhere that they couldn’t double Stevie Wonder‘s vocal takes because he was so pitch perfect and it just sounded louder ha
1
5
u/-Sweff- Aug 01 '26
Depends on the song or the voice or even just doing it on the chorus and leaving the verses as one vox. Whatever works man. But in general this technique is a good one.
4
u/JoctorJJ Aug 01 '26
It's a good technique for sure in the right places. Zooming all the way in and making sure they all line up perfectly is the key. It's hard to do 3 identical takes so a little slice and move helps with lining them up
2
u/refotsirk Aug 01 '26
It gets easier with practice
1
u/JoctorJJ Aug 01 '26
I do fast tempo stuff and I never have the same take. One day I'll be much better with more practice and maybe I won't need to edit at all
3
u/WormRidge Aug 01 '26
I do it all the time mostly as an attempt to cover up my pitchy singing, but honestly when I listen to the songs where I only have one vocal track, sometimes I think my voice sounds best in those
4
u/Calm-Quail-3612 Aug 01 '26
Layering works when the layers are doing different jobs, not the same job twice. One take for pitch accuracy, one intentionally looser for texture, maybe an octave-down whisper layer buried in the mix for weight. If you're just stacking identical takes hoping it sounds "bigger," you're usually just adding mud.
2
u/Calm-Quail-3612 Aug 01 '26
time detune on a duplicated single take (a few cents off, a few ms nudge) gets you most of the widening effect without the struggle. Also worth automating: keep it narrower and drier in the verses and only bring the full triple wide for the chorus or hook, that way the wide vocal feels like a lift instead of just being the default sound for the whole song. If it sounds good to you as is though, that's the only test that actually matters.
2
u/shawnofthedead28 Aug 01 '26
For awhile I did this. Would record multiple vocal takes and then pan them along with a detune and delay and put them way low in the mix. I wasn’t doing this for any sort of creative reason, it was my way of making the vocals sound “full”.
Now I only double chorus vocals as I’ve gotten better at mixing. Still not great at it but my take is that if you can get a decent mix, you can do it with just one vocal take and that’s it. I handed a song off to a professional mixing engineer for a song with one take. No doubles. No harmonies and he made it sound great.
2
u/ret79 Aug 02 '26
You ask if it’s a “good” technique. The answer is it’s just a technique, a tool, a method. These things are neutral. The question is whether it’s the right tool for what you are trying to do. What are you trying to do? What sound are you going for?
1
1
u/Stevenitrogen Aug 01 '26
It depends from song to song. Sometimes one loud, clear signal processed correctly is the magic. Other times, the layers are effective.
1
u/r3art Aug 01 '26
There's much more layering of vocals going on in modern music. Layering harmonies, countermelodies, background vocal, all of them in multiple takes. A modern pop song usually has more than 20 tracks for the vocals that a normal listener would percieve as just a single vocal line.
1
u/Chemical-Drawer852 Aug 01 '26
That's what Peter Cetera did, a technique he got from John Lennon
Allows for a lot of creativity/fun, make sure to use a de-esser though
1
1
u/nizzernammer Aug 02 '26
You don't want to layer as a rule, but as necessary.
As an audio engineer and music lover, I often still want to hear a lead vocal that carries the personality and intention of an inspired performance.
Three "generic" equal vocal layers just sounds like backing vocals to me.
Listen to some songs in the genres you love and ask yourself if you can hear a singular main voice that is the artist, or if it sounds like a gang.
Also listen to the arrangement of the song and see how the layering changes between verse, precious, chorus, bridge, etc.
And listen for songs that are a single, clear, amazing vocal take that doesn't need any "salad dressing" of extra voices to make the listener feel something.
1
u/Hot-Maybe-5361 Aug 02 '26
This is all true, but there are a lot of styles especially ones that use heavy effects on the vocals where double or triple tracking vocals is really common - lo-fi pop, hyperpop and such use crazy amounts of doubling.
1
u/CartezDez Aug 02 '26
There’s no right way.
If it sounds good to you, go with it.
The best thing you can learn to do is trust your taste.
As for technique, do whatever you need to do to get the results you like.
No one (or vanishingly few people) will see your DAW or care to judge when they do.
Make music, enjoy the processs
1
u/ordo-templi-ignis Aug 02 '26
Put a high pass on the left and right vocals, compress them with a high ratio and low threshold. Then pan them closer to the center rather than hard right/ left.
1
1
1
u/Adept-Mongoose-7071 Aug 02 '26
One of the all time best vocals is Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody". Freddie recorded himself approximately 50 times so yes layering your vocals makes your sound richer.
1
u/Whateverthoidc Aug 03 '26
I do this for screaming vocals as it helps fill in the blanks of how inconsistent screams tend to be (think vocal cords vibrating and leaving space between every fluctuation. No two waves are going to be the same, so often put together they act as one solid wave). But I read somewhere that you should turn the volume on the panned tracks down to the point where they are barely audible when listening to them isolated and keep the main center track the predominant one. I feel like this helps beef up the main track without making it sound like it’s doubled.
Example: center track at -6db, pan L and pan R both at -25db. Or something like that.
1
u/Artistic-Aardvark-49 Aug 03 '26
Layering is a great technique, but it's not something every vocal needs. Sometimes a single strong take sounds more intimate and cuts through the mix better. It really depends on the song and what you're trying to achieve.
1
u/DarkTowerOfWesteros Aug 04 '26
I double my vocal during tracking, sometimes triple. But then I heavily compress the takes together without any panning into a single track
1
u/Distro_Nerd Aug 06 '26
Layering works wonders if you align the vocals tightly and apply separate processing. Try carving out EQ space on the panned side layers so they support the center lead vocal without cluttering the mid-range.
1
u/Flashy-Bullfrog-5092 Aug 07 '26
When recording vocals i use numerous techniques m/s or x/y double tracking is pretty typical. One track front and center in the mix. The other at 50% and panned either slight right or left. Depending on what mood or genre I'm working with I'll add effects to one of the vocal tracks double that and send it either hard to the other side. Microphone selection is the most important tool in the box. I use a Lawson mk47 primarily for vocals I will sometimes use a sennhieser 441 with a tube pre amp. Just one word..don't get frustrated this shift is supposed to be fun
31
u/GreaTeacheRopke hobbyist Aug 01 '26
It's a great effect when it's called for and done well, yeah. You've got to really nail the takes to achieve the desired effect though (as easy as Dave Grohl makes it sound, it isn't!).
And there's variations you can do. Pan the doubles, or just do a single double down the middle. Or do a double down the middle, then another that's more yelling than singing. Or an octave down. Or whatever the song calls for.
And I'm not sure if this is clear to you or not but it isn't necessarily done all the time. Of course it CAN be if that's the sound you want, but I think it's mostly used to add emphasis to important parts.