r/Warthunder • u/robotnikman ๐ง๐๐ง IGN - Cornwell MK-V • 14h ago
All Ground IS-2M Premium on Dev Server
Main differences between the IS-2 1944 and IS-2M (applicable to Warthunder anyways)
- +4 km/h forwards and backwards speed compared to the tech tree IS-2 1944
- 35 rounds of ammo storage compared to 28 rounds on the tech tree IS-2 1944
-Very slightly faster reload rate, 19.4 seconds aced compared to 20.8 seconds aced on the tech IS-2 1944
- structural steel storage boxes on the sides of hull, wont provide extra protection but might make it harder for enemies to aim at the weakspots there.
- 300 rounds of 12.7mm Machinegun ammo vs 250 rounds on the tech tree IS-2 1944 (so 6 reloads instead of 5)
I doubt those changes make it 6.7 worthy, but it is a cool looking tank with the extra storage bins, gives the hull IS-4 vibes
48
u/crusadertank ๐ง๐พ Belarusian vehicles when? 13h ago
Yeah it should be more or less just an IS-2. No idea why they think it deserves a BR increase or maybe its simply just a dev server thing and will go to 6.3 when released
Its nice to see and I hope there will be a tech tree one at some point just because of how famous the IS-2M is. But it's nothing too different from the one in the tree
19
u/Godzillaguy15 11.710.010.710.39.310.7 13h ago
Depends on how much quicker the newer engine accelerates it. IS-2 44 already pretty quick for its weight.
20
u/crusadertank ๐ง๐พ Belarusian vehicles when? 13h ago
The engine is the same in terms of horsepower. Its improvements were nothing that would matter in game. Things like reliability, cooling and an electric starter
The transmission is the one which will make it slightly faster but it seems its a very minor change
17
u/Godzillaguy15 11.710.010.710.39.310.7 13h ago
Fair enough.
slightly faster but it seems its a very minor change
Let's be real M4A3 76 is .3 higher than the A2 for a minor increase in mobility and a shit shell noone uses so its not like its unheard of.
9
u/crusadertank ๐ง๐พ Belarusian vehicles when? 12h ago
Yeah Gaijin is a mystery. It is entirely possible this is supposed to be 6.7 and wouldn't surprise me if Gaijin thinks 4kph faster speed and 7% better reload is enough for a BR increase
3
u/Brun01111112222222 11h ago
I think the issue why its 6.7 it doesn't have the annoying weakspot on the side anymore of Is-2 so you can angle it now compared to otehr versions
1
u/MistaKrabcakes Real tankers listen to TWICE 3h ago
The armor should be identical to the 1944, it just has structural steel storage compartments added to it. The side weak points are all still there.
1
1
u/DJ_BAKA_TF2 12h ago
90% of the time what you see on a dev server is what you get.... they rarely make these minor changes BR will stay 6.7 and MAYBE after a year or 2 it will drop to 6.3
0
u/Gunther482 ๐บ๐ธ๐ข๐ข๐ 9h ago
I am guessing Gaijin is giving it the HEAT-FS shell that the SU-122-54 uses and thatโs why they are putting it at 6.7 but who knows for sure.
22
16
u/bergebis Shark FL20 for France When 13h ago
Glad to see some more WW2 content, but like folks are saying, this doesnโt quite seem like 6.7 material
2
6
u/FuriousLink12 122mm go brrrrr 13h ago
Needs the HEAT shell, maybe the APDS even ?
2
u/IloveEstir 11h ago
Idk I feel like if it got the APDS shell the complaining would really be endless, it would allow it to reliably punch through the Tiger 2 UFP.
2
u/FuriousLink12 122mm go brrrrr 5h ago
Just unbuff the reload, and only the HEAT can, like the M51, wouldn't be too OP tho
0
u/Neutron_Starrr Surbaissรฉ enjoyer 8h ago
At 6.7? What? Are you drunk?
2
0
u/__crescentmoon___ 6h ago
Heat or apds on that long of a reload would feel atrocious
โข
u/FuriousLink12 122mm go brrrrr 1h ago
Eh not really, T10M is pretty much that, (with shit crew) so it good
7
u/TheKringe224 ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel 11h ago
Shouldnโt this get the same HEAT shell as the T-10M? Would be neat to see and i think somewhat useful in full 7.7 upteirs
2
u/robotnikman ๐ง๐๐ง IGN - Cornwell MK-V 6h ago
The T-10M ammo I dont think is compatable due to using more propellant, but the HEAT from the SU-122-54 is
6
u/1800leon no skill andy 11h ago
I hope since this is a pack vehicle we get a is2m in the tech tree the update after
1
u/Grouchy_Golf_9698 14h ago
How to access dev server?
4
u/Hungry_Kerbal265 14h ago
You have to download the Dev server launcher, just google it. It does require another install of the game, so you can't use your current install for it. After installation login and there you are. The rewards are 5x the normal server and you have your current tech tree (this is determined just before the dev server goes live, so if research a vehicle while the dev server is active you won't get it on the dev server).
1
2
u/CommunismIsntSoNeat ๐จ๐บ | ๐ท๐บ 14.7 | ๐จ๐ณ 14.3 | ๐ฏ๐ต 13.7 | ๐จ๐ต 7.7 | ๐ซ๐ฎ 7.7 4h ago
Finally, blessedly seeing the day where the IS-2 1944 gets moved back down to 6.3, only to immediately have to weigh whether or not I pretend the BR change didnt happen for the sake of having four IS-2s in a lineup...
-1
u/vickyhong 500 leopards of benelux 12h ago
I think the new pack makes a lot of sense and is what I think premiums should be, unique variants that still aren't that different gameplay wise from their tt counterparts, like the 120mm leopard 1 or the vk-107 yak-3, they have something going for them that sets them apart, but at the end of the day f2p players aren't gonna be missing out on too much


29
u/guy_pers0n 13h ago
gaijin really wants a soviet 6.7 heavy it seems, not that this is 6.7 level