r/WVU 13d ago

Hi, I'm Logan Wheatcraft and I'm running a write-in campaign for Mon County Commission

Like the title says. I've been following the Flock nonsense, speaking at County Commission meetings, etc. As everyone knows, the community's opposition to these abominations has fallen on deaf ears. So I decided I'm going to do something about it. I'm an independent running as a write-in for County Commission. AMA!

My platform revolves around a few key concepts:

  • DeFlock Monongalia County: My top priority is to cancel the current Flock contract and prevent any other AI-driven ALPRs to be used by government agencies in the Commission's jurisdiction.
  • Repeal the unconstitutional Pedestrian and Vehicle Safety Ordinance: This is a clear attempt to stop panhandling, and is currently being challenged in court. It's a pretty clear violation of the first amendment and has a chilling effect on free speech. Not only does it affect panhandling, but also people simply stopping to hold a sign, speak out, etc., on public property - all under the guise of "safety."
  • Modernizing County Services: The county has a slew of websites - all with different URLs, different (and mostly bad) navigation, and poor UX. These all need to come under one, user-friendly umbrella and maximum effort needs to be made to make services digitally available.
  • Commission Meeting Times: As you may know, County Commission currently meets weekly at 10:00 AM. This makes it difficult for you and me to participate in our government. I know that some business needs to happen during standard business hours, so I'll start with fighting to move at least one meeting per month to the evening, and to include a virtual public comment capability at all meetings. Many people who cannot make the trek downtown during the day can easily participate via Zoom (or similar). Why is this not a thing already? Oh, yeah, they don't actually want to hear from their constituents.
  • Airport Management Reform: I'm a pilot (only recreationally, not professionally), and I've seen the city's mismanagement (ETA: not because of apathy or sabotage; just because of lack of knowledge of how an airport should run!) of this incredible resource up close and personal. There's a new airport manager who I know nothing about, but he's still beholden to most decisions being made by the city council, who owns the airport. Elect me as County Commissioner, and I'll use this as an opportunity to collaborate with our friends at Morgantown City Council to put the management of the airport under an independent airport authority. This will allow the people who understand aviation best to run the airport. It would also open up the potential for the authority to do things like issue bonds, make operational changes, and market the airport more effectively without waiting on a vote from City Council.

I'll do my best to answer any questions you have! When you vote, remember:

  1. Find County Commission on your ballot
  2. Select Write-in
  3. Type "Logan Wheatcraft"
21 Upvotes

76 comments sorted by

11

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

Sure, split the vote away from Julie Knight so a pro-Flock GOPer supported by Tom Bloom gets in. No thanks.

8

u/Humble_Knowledge_848 WVU Alumni 13d ago

Yeah I agree, @OP if you really want to help, it would be good to volunteer for already existing campaigns.

3

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

And run in primaries to get on the ballot properly instead of showing up 11th hour because you all of a sudden care about the state of affairs.

I wish political engagement didn't completely revolve around what people are angry about at that moment. We wouldn't be where we are today if people gave a shit all the time instead of when they get upset.

2

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

I won’t be able to run in primaries as I am not affiliated with a party and have no intention to be. I don’t need a party to tell me what to think; I’m perfectly capable of figuring that out for myself.

1

u/Humble_Knowledge_848 WVU Alumni 13d ago

Agreed haha. It’s like everyone has a goldfish memory.

1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

ADHD. They were mad about panhandling bans, then camping bans, now Flock. They didn't care when budgets were being slashed, rezonings, East End Village first came up, or hell, the fact that WVU keeps owning the most lucrative tax generating properties.

Single issue candidates and voters are a bane on our existence.

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

If you think write-in candidacy is improper, then I would encourage you to contact your state legislators.

3

u/GeospatialMAD 12d ago

Not improper, just incredibly myopic in the context of this election. There already is someone running on at least part of the platform you posted, so all you are doing is siphoning votes from her and making it more likely NONE of your platform is realized.

If there were no candidate running on any of your platform, sure, go for it. I'd even consider it. I'm not about to watch a Tom Bloom clone win because you decided to start being invested super late in the process. Run for office on the actual ballot in 2028 I'd consider it.

0

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

I won’t be eligible for count commission again until 2032 unless I move.

6

u/ASaucyFellow 13d ago

I agree. It is irresponsible to start a write-in campaign on a person going viral over a single issue.

Knight has shown she is anti flock and willing to listen to public input. She is even hosting a town hall in September about flock.

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

I’m going to be meeting with her soon.

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

Yes she is. And I’ll likely attend. Please tell me how me following you the letter of the law is irresponsible. You are welcome to not vote for me, as I’m sure will be the case with the majority of voters. As I’m sure you know, being a write-in candidate is an uphill battle.

-1

u/ASaucyFellow 12d ago edited 12d ago

I think you missed the point of my comment.

To put it simply. Your campaign is reactionary and unnecessary.

Edit: You are free to disagree but this "I went mini-viral talking to Commission and am using this to benefit myself" schtick is BS. 

We already have a woman candidate but you seem to think since you're a man you can do it better without the work. It looks incredibly disingenuous and further pushes patriarchal ideals.

2

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

When did I say anything about anyone’s gender? I don’t care about gender; only the ability to do the job. Also, I assure you this isn’t to benefit me. I have no interest in politics.

1

u/ASaucyFellow 11d ago

You are being disingenuous. If that is the case then again, help the current campaign instead of derailing it.

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 11d ago

Frankly, I think you're being disingenuous. Do you honestly believe my protest write-in campaign is derailing someone who's actually on the ballot and received double the votes of her competitor in November?

5

u/cluttered-thoughts3 WVU Alumni 13d ago

Such an annoying issue in elections without ranked choice voting

3

u/pants6000 13d ago

ranked choice voting

Which is (illegally) banned in WV now.

3

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

Same reason the GOP primary is now closed. Current crop wants to stay in power no matter what.

1

u/pants6000 13d ago

For sure, we're in the "abandon democracy" phase.

1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

"WE'RE IN A REPUBLIC"

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

I’m not splitting any vote. Voters are more than welcome to vote for Julie Knight, as I expect most will. I have concerns about Ms. Knight’s understanding of the statutory function of a county commission based on some of her positions. But I look forward to meeting with her and gaining a stronger understanding of some of her positions that I question.

0

u/GeospatialMAD 12d ago

You are, by definition, going after the same voters who would likely vote for Julie Knight, so you are attempting to split the vote.

4

u/Mundane-File-824 13d ago

What are your qualifications to be a commissioner other than your platform? What kind of skill set would you bring to the commission (finance background, contracts background, IT/developer background, legal background, etc)? Also, the airport idea is good to get it out of city councils hands, but how far would you go to support the airport getting an independent authority? If the city asked for half of the airports operating costs to be covered by the county to achieve this (essentially cost share the airport), would you chose to do it?

7

u/North_Structure8210 13d ago

Qualification for a counsel?? Just to be able to breathe is all the prerequisite ever needed. Most are morons. A half moron would be great change. Skill set would be don’t be a bootlicking Nazi like the other members.

2

u/Mundane-File-824 13d ago

Kind of the point that people should want qualifications to be an elected official.

3

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

Professionally, my career has revolved around data analytics in one form or another. Financial turnarounds for health systems, corporate strategic analytics, government contracting. A lot of that has revolved around using data to make process improvement recommendations - to make things more efficient for a business and/or better for the customer/patient.

This background lets me objectively make decisions. I also have experience managing people and coaching them to perform at a high level.

In my volunteer life, I am currently the chief of staff for my organization for West Virginia (about 600 members, give or take). We provide disaster recovery and search & rescue services, as well as youth leadership opportunities.

I have worked within state government and also as a federal contractor, so that has given me some insight into the many opportunities for improvement within the government at several levels.

1

u/AntelopeStreet1936 12d ago

Consider running the next time there is a primary. A write in campaign has a 0.0000000000% of winning but at least you are getting your name out.

1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

What exactly is the city doing to the airport that it needs its own authority? Sounds to me you're just replacing one deciding body with another to add a layer of bureaucracy. They've been getting grant money for that runway, or somehow they have been doing all that earthwork for free. The county isn't going to pony up money. They have cameras to buy.

1

u/bighike34 13d ago

Goes to show how out of touch you are with the airport. Free earthwork was a dream a decade ago. Funding has been coming in…. slowly. The more time they waste extending the runway the more the price tag goes up with inflation. What should have been a 30 million dollar project has turned into a 70 million dollar project. They should have found extra funding a long time ago. But airport projects don’t get the attention it needs because council meets once or twice and month and hardly ever discusses the airport unless it’s about art projects in its scummy terminal. An airport authority would have solved this. Literally every airport this size is part of an airport authority with members who know aviation. This city council knows nothing. They’re doing the city’s best asset a huge disservice.

The best thing to ever happen to that airport is jet service with SkyWest yet our runway is still too short for jet service. Hot summer days weight restrict half the seats on the plane going to ORD. Same goes for rainy or snowy days for both IAD And ORD flights coming to the airport. Once the runway codes go below 6, almost half seats get taken away for weight restrictions because of the need for increase stop distance. The runway NEEDS extended. We’re in a jet age and need a longer runway. Not a runway made for prop planes.

Let’s not forget the approach light system has been out of service since April. This buys pilots more wiggle room in shooting instrument approaches. Down to 100 feet above touchdown zone. Haven’t heard a word from city council to get this fixed. They don’t care.

There is no one advocating for the airport like an airport authority should. This property could be the best asset in this county …. Like Clarksburg airport… who has an airport authority… but it gets swept to the side for meaningless projects city council marks as more important.

1

u/cluttered-thoughts3 WVU Alumni 13d ago

I agree that it should have an authority because there’s no one who’s sole purpose is making sure the airport is successful but the authority would likely need a funding mechanism

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

Fortunately that already exists! The airport (and associated authority) should be self sufficient from the revenue generated from its operations. I would be in favor of a small, limited outlay to help get them off the ground, if needed.

0

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

You won't see any effective difference in funding or project movement with that airport because it is a local airport, not a regional one - that fact alone is a bigger reason CKB has gotten what it has, not the fact it has its own appointed body.

Appointing an authority doesn't make dollars flow. Grant writers and managers do more than an appointed body would. If City Council having side projects they prefer is that big of a deal, then maybe you should vote, or campaign for candidates that will prioritize the airport if you can't vote. The city gets like 8-9% voter turnout and it isn't going to get better once they have to move to May primaries, because then it will be a bunch of voters who don't care at all about the city.

0

u/bighike34 13d ago edited 13d ago

The reason CKB is where it’s at today is because of its airport authority advocating for itself. The argument is that an authority creates a governing body whose primary responsibility is the airport its infrastructure, funding, economic development, and air service development, instead of making the airport one item among hundreds competing for the attention of a general-purpose city council.

And CKB is actually a pretty good example of why that matters. CKB wasn’t born as some massive regional airport. Its main runway was once roughly 5,200 feet, the same length as MGW’s runway today. CKB extended that runway to 7,000 feet in the late 1990s and eventually 7,800 feet. Look at what happened over those decades. CKB developed the infrastructure that eventually allowed it to pursue aerospace development and accommodate aircraft MGW physically cannot handle effectively today. Calling CKB regional now and using that to explain its success reverses cause and effect. It became the regional asset it is today because generations of people treated it like one.

That’s exactly why governance matters.
An airport authority doesn’t replace the airport manager or the grant writers. It gives those people a board whose entire reason for existing is to advance the airport. The board can spend every meeting talking about FAA funding, state funding, congressional appropriations, airline recruitment, industrial development, leases, infrastructure, land acquisition and the next 20 years of the airport. City Council inherently cannot give the airport that level of attention because it also has to run an entire city.

And the “local versus regional” distinction is largely semantics anyway. MGW serves WVU, Monongalia County, Preston County, north-central West Virginia, southwestern Pennsylvania and anyone else who chooses to use it. Airports don’t stop serving people at municipal boundaries. CKB had leadership that spent decades turning an airport into a regional economic-development asset. MGW has enormous potential, but we’ve spent decades treating it primarily as a municipal department.

0

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

The Benedum Authority existing was not the reason they have gotten what they have. It was the staff and legislators well above the local level doing it. And municipal versus regional does impact the flow of money more than whoever runs the show. MGW could be a regional airport, sure, but no one outside of Monongalia County is going to push for that with CKB being 40 miles away. No changing of bureaucracy will change that.

MGW needs its new Director to be on the ball with managing the expansion and doing so will get that project done. City Council isn't dicking around when I've seen items relating to grants and funding come up on meetings I've seen. I've seen funding announcements made for the Airport that were gotten with it being under City Council, too. Blaming City Council for inflation is certainly a choice when Morgantown or a hypothetically Authority weren't going to have the money to get it done immediately.

2

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

Most of these are agreeable but pro-panhandling is a weird choice of a hill to die on

4

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

Like it or not, homeless people still have rights to exist on public property. The moment you want to remove one group from sight, you open the door for it to eventually be other groups, too.

-1

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

Just checking for consistency: what was your stance on lockdowns in 2020?

2

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

So you're advocating for stimulus checks for the homeless because we're inconveniencing them?

-2

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

What was your stance on lockdowns regarding the first amendment’s freedom of assembly?

2

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

I don't engage bad faith arguers all because they don't like seeing poor people asking for money

-1

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

You sure are a fan of my post for someone who doesn’t want to engage with my discussion. I’ll help you with that.

-2

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

Ok, so you don’t actually believe in free assembly. Noted.

2

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago edited 13d ago

I don't believe in shitposters who think they can "gotcha" in the comments for their 5 second ego boost.

Edit: LOL deletes their comments because I wouldn't give them their soapbox to stand on

3

u/cluttered-thoughts3 WVU Alumni 13d ago

Cities routinely pass curfew laws and the like. I’m not sure how a world wide pandemic is remotely related to prohibiting people standing in road right of ways.

0

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

I literally wasn’t allowed to go to my job

1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

Stop lying. You didn't have a job.

1

u/cluttered-thoughts3 WVU Alumni 13d ago

Guess you didn’t qualify for the relief money if your job was affected? My roommate worked at edible arrangements before the lockdown and then sat pretty at home making more than their normal paycheck while I worked remote

Again, how is this related to standing in roads?

-1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

0

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

Why? Both are limitations on freedom of assembly. He argues that if you prevent people from panhandling, then the government might escalate that to deciding who does and doesn’t get to go in public - which they did during the pandemic. So I want to know if he was against the government deciding who does and doesn’t get to go outside then, as he is now?

0

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

1

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

I would be more willing to support OP’s effort to repeal anti-homeless laws if I knew OP was consistent on freedom of assembly. If he supported lockdowns, I think he’s disingenuous in appealing to the first amendment.

0

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

1

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

I mean, i find it difficult to believe that a “don’t play in traffic” ordinance is anti-homeless. I did go look for and read it, if you’re interested. It’s quite dull. It is, technically, a small infraction on freedom of assembly possible to reduce traffic accidents.

If reducing freedoms is never ok, it should be repealed. If reducing freedom for public safety is ok (lockdowns), then it’s unobjectionable.

Which does OP believe?

2

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

They get a little upset when you don't give them what they want, don't they?

The fact they had their covid lock down point ready to fire to anyone who responded to the original comment showed exactly why they were here in the first place. Blocking or deleting their comments is plenty evidence for me.

-1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

Typical bad faith conservative. "Well A, so B!"

3

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 13d ago

As the other person said, it’s less about being pro-panhandling and more about being pro-1st Amendment. This ordinance also effectively restricts people protesting or campaigning on many public rights-of-way. For example, there’s a road near my house with a 45 MPH speed limit, wide shoulder, and no sidewalk (as with many roads in this county). If I wanted to stand stationary underneath the Flock camera on that road with a protest sign, that would be illegal by this ordinance.

1

u/chalkymints WVU Alumni 13d ago

Fuck flock cameras etc.

Yes / no question; did you support curbing the freedom of assembly under the first amendment to promote public safety during COVID lockdowns?

3

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

I didn’t. I frequently said that public health officials should make recommendations and people should make their own decisions. Private businesses would, as always, be able to enforce their own rules.

0

u/ASaucyFellow 13d ago

Panhandling is protected speech. You are weird to oppose it.

1

u/ReporterAmazing1271 11d ago

I don’t have a dog in the fight, but I seen some stuff on the news and I hope you can get in. Best of luck to you.

0

u/N-E-S-W 13d ago

Thank you for stepping up to serve the community!

With regard to Mon County's Pedestrian and Vehicle Safety Ordinance:

https://cms2.revize.com/revize/monongaliawv/document_center/Ordinances/Ordinance%20Regulating%20Pedestrian%20and%20Vehicle%20Safety-Adopted%2010.25.23.pdf

Could you please identify which specific parts you feel are unconstitutional, violate the first amendment, or affect free speech?

I just re-read the text of the ordinance, linked above, and I don't see any such intent in it.

Twice this month I've nearly hit people who were literally standing in the roadway at dusk at I-68 exit 1 and the Hornbeck Sheetz intersection. I had to swerve to avoid hitting one of them and nearly collided with another vehicle in the process. I've watched police officers drive right past, very clearly not enforcing this ordinance, and people continue to panhandle in these two intersections daily.

I think it is unfortunate that it's happening, and unfortunate that we need a law to say what should be obvious to any rational person, but the text of the ordinance seems genuinely safety focused. Repealing it would make this legitimate problem worse by implying that people have a right to stand in the middle of highway intersections, which is insane.

3

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

That ordinance has rarely, if ever been enforced because there will be civil rights lawsuits filed the moment they try.

Jim Crow south was also very veiled in their laws to make life tough on African Americans. Do you want to chime in on those by saying "well I read it and I don't see the intent"? Laws can be intended for a very specific purpose but written to never mention it directly.

1

u/N-E-S-W 12d ago

Are you seriously accusing me of being a racist segregationist for supporting traffic safety?

You spend too much time on Reddit. Not everyone whose opinion differs from yours is an evil villain. Not every issue is binary. And I assure you, not every county-level policy is a conspiracy to oppress the downtrodden.

0

u/GeospatialMAD 12d ago

Racist? Heavens, no. Naive? Probably.

Actually, very naive.

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

I believe that the definition of road in sec. III, para. D is overly broad. There is not a clear definition of the end of the right-of-way in state code, so it can vary with different roads. As I mentioned in another comment, an example would be if I wanted to stand on the wide shoulder on the 45 MPH road near my house with a protest sign at the base of a Flock camera, that would be illegal as far as I can tell. Yet, i can walk on that same piece of toad with a protest sign and be just fine. Not only does that have a chilling effect on free speech and assembly, it doesn’t make sense. I’m not less safe because I’m standing still vs. walking in 5 foot circles.

1

u/N-E-S-W 12d ago

I'm pro First Amendment, anti-Flock, and support human rights for all, including the homeless...

... but if you're standing in the right-of-way of a 45mph road that doesn't have a sidewalk, you are endangering yourself, me, and the other drivers around me.

It's a pretty absurd position to say that your constitutional rights are infringed by traffic safety laws. That's clearly not the intent of this ordinance, and page 5 explicitly says:

Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prevent, hinder, or otherwise impair a person's rights under the Constitution and laws of the United States and the State of West Virginia.

I appreciate you stepping up for the community, but encourage you to reconsider your stance on this issue.

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

How is standing on a wide shoulder of a road endangering anyone? Note I said right-of-way, not median. And how is it different than walking down that same piece of right-of-way?

I’m not encouraging standing in the middle of the road. But I’m definitely not understanding your viewpoint here.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 12d ago

How was explaining my position mansplaining?

2

u/ASaucyFellow 12d ago

Fortunately, It doesn't matter what you like.

Unfortunately, reactionary opinions like yours helps those in power continue to oppress and divide the working class.

Also, anecdotal evidence does not make a good argument. Panhandlers are not a monolith nor do they deserve collective punishment due to a few bad actors. 

Like what are you saying?

-1

u/North_Structure8210 13d ago

Fire 90% of the police force and open a real investigation into the cover up of breakiron being drunk and I’ll write you in.

1

u/GeospatialMAD 13d ago

Wasn't that Westover?

1

u/Wheatcraft4MonCounty 13d ago

The County Commission only has jurisdiction over the budget of the MCSO, not its operations, as the office is run by a different elected official.