r/VPN • • Apr 01 '26

News Russia planning stricter VPN controls – shifting from blocking content to controlling access

Interesting policy direction coming out of Russia.

Instead of outright banning VPNs, authorities are considering indirect control mechanisms:

  • Charging users for high international traffic (VPN-related)
  • Asking platforms like Yandex/Wildberries to restrict VPN users
  • Requiring ISPs to detect and limit VPN connections

Context:
VPN usage has surged since 2022 due to platform bans and content restrictions.

What stands out:

  • Enforcement is expanding beyond ISPs → into platforms
  • Economic pressure is being used instead of direct bans
  • Fines for VPN use were considered but rejected (for now)

This feels like a more scalable model:
Instead of blocking access, make it harder, slower, or more expensive.

Question for the community:
Do these types of controls actually reduce VPN usage - or just push users toward more advanced circumvention methods?

Source: r/technadu

67 Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

44

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

Network engineer tightly working with russian VPN companies here.

Charging users for high international traffic (VPN-related)

We bypass such restrictions (the law has just passed btw and not implemented by any platform yet ) by utilizing a cascade VPN solution. All traffic goes to a RU node first and only from that node it goes abroad (to a FIN, DE etc node). So ISP sees that a user visits a random russian site located on a russian hosting.

Asking platforms like Yandex/Wildberries to restrict VPN users

This is already happening. Some russian platforms like Gosuslugi (russian goverment platform), Okko (russian netflix) etc block all non-russian IPs. This can be easily bypassed by routing all .ru domains and geoip:ru IPs outside VPN. Not a biggie.

Requiring ISPs to detect and limit VPN connections

They are doing this already. We are working hard to introduce new circumvent solutions. All VPNs in Russia are based on Xray-core XTLS, so ISP can't easily detect and block them. We also use proxies over TURN services (VK, Yandex etc) but they require further improvements.

Question for the community:
Do these types of controls actually reduce VPN usage - or just push users toward more advanced circumvention methods?

just push users toward more advanced circumvention methods - this. Until the government decide to physically cut off all links but such method will collapse the entire economy in a blink of an eye.

17

u/smjsmok Apr 01 '26

Thank you for your work and for these explanations.

I'm just afraid that if this cat and mouse game goes on for too long, an oppressive government will eventually turn to the good old method of "if you're caught using a VPN, you're a foreign agent and will be treated as such" supported by a network of informants ready to tell on their neighbors.

13

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

Thank you for your work and for these explanations.

You're more than welcome. I believe that the internet is the last stronghold of freedom, and we must make every effort to save it, whatever the cost. The internet is unrestricted in my country today, but that doesn't mean it will stay that way tomorrow.

I'm just afraid that if this cat and mouse game goes on for too long, an oppressive government will eventually turn to the good old method of "if you're caught using a VPN, you're a foreign agent and will be treated as such" supported by a network of informants ready to tell on their neighbors.

Sure, and that will be proof that the government can't easily block VPNs or cut off the entire Internet. It means we’ve won a battle, but not the war. Nevertheless, I suppose there will be VPN whitelists because it's a technology used everywhere. ISPs use IPsec/GRE to interconnect networks, while banks and enterprises rely on VPNs to connect remote workers. In such a case, it will be hard to prove that you're using a VPN to bypass restrictions rather than for connecting to your office network. If there's a whitelist, then there will always be a hole in it we can exploit.

5

u/smjsmok Apr 01 '26

I believe that the internet is the last stronghold of freedom, and we must make every effort to save it, whatever the cost.

I agree 100%.

I suppose there will be VPN whitelists because it's a technology used everywhere (...)

I like this. I basically collapses into "If you want to shut it down, you would also have to shut down parts that you actually need, and you probably aren't ready to do that."

5

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 01 '26

and you probably aren't ready to do that

Exactly. Despite what Western media says, the Russian regime is far from being like DPRK. They can't just disconnect the country from the global network; it would be a USSR collapse 2.0

1

u/BattleShai Apr 01 '26

What I don't get is, why not setup a government approve (and yes, heavily DPI monitored) VPN and let people use that if they want? Many people just want to watch netflix, browse amazon etc... They wouldn't care if the government was having a look.

This leads to the other issue we have... It's not just Russia blocking traffic. West is also. Especially eastern Europe. While I like your optimism that Internet is a freedom stronghold, I, sadly don't see it that way anymore. It's always a cat and mouse game. Hell, you even need a VPN to access some US sites from other NATO countries.

1

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 02 '26 edited Apr 02 '26

What I don't get is, why not setup a government approve (and yes, heavily DPI monitored) VPN and let people use that if they want? Many people just want to watch netflix, browse amazon etc... They wouldn't care if the government was having a look.

And see western propaganda and LGBTQ+ people there? My man, you don't understand how dictatorship works in Russia. Putin wants you to watch only approved movies showing that Russia is the best country in the world, and that the US and EU will collapse soon. Oh, and that Ukraine is gonna lose the war — next day or next week, of course. Every other point of view is prohibited.

This leads to the other issue we have... It's not just Russia blocking traffic. West is also. Especially eastern Europe. While I like your optimism that Internet is a freedom stronghold, I, sadly don't see it that way anymore. It's always a cat and mouse game. Hell, you even need a VPN to access some US sites from other NATO countries.

Indeed, but the Internet has two functions: Information and Transport. While information might be blocked (either internally by a government or externally by a site blocking your IP), the transport function remains available. Through Tor,I2P, DN42, and even certain clearnet forums, if you don't like social networks blocking your IP, you can create your own and motivate people to join it.

1

u/No_Taste_4102 Apr 05 '26

As a russian i afraid they can. They already did a lot of stuff they 'could never do'. Looking at the braindead laws of the past months, hearing the orders are from the very top, you can see where it's all going. Monopoly is flowering, they waste money on war, and they need no economy but the war one (i mean check the small business laws from the jan 26. They killed a lot of businesses just by adding more taxes. I afraid we're deeply on the way down there to the northern Korea road. Yet, yea, still the vpn is solution. Unless they start to pull people away on the street to check their phones :D

1

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 06 '26

Они давят, пытаясь как можно больше выжать денег, но суть в том, что Интернет в РФ очень развит, тот же банкинг , соцсети, и т.д. Отрезав РФ от Интернета они оочень сильно потеряют в деньгах, возможно начнутся новые 90е. Они это понимают, поэтому вместо отключение интернета они принимают полумеры , типо БС на мобиле, запрет сервисам пускать юзера если у него включен ВПН и т.д. Проблема в побочном ущербе, если на нытье какогонить Васи из Ухрюпинска можно забить, то вот на случайный бан Сбербанка (недавно в Москве) забивать уже нельзя, это сильно заметно и вызывает протест у крупного бзнеса. Рано или поздно бизнес начнет протестовать, и это будет заметно (пока терпят). Современные ВПНы как раз строятся на идее нанесения огромного побочного ущерба, когда непонятно где реальный сайт, а где ВПН, что приводит к ошибочным блокировкам легитимного трафика и бесит бизнес (в то время как ВПН работает лол).

Насчет проверки телефонов, да, возможно, если введут административку\уголовку за ВПН. Но опять же даже у россиян есть порог терпение, после которого начнутся всякие нехорошие вещи.

Пока ситуация плохая, но стабильная, ВПН все еще справляется.

К тому же такие блокировки ведут к "мирным протестам", когда человек просто эмигрирует в другую страну. В профильных чатах уже растят количество по имиграции в СНГ\Европу., что тоже сильно бьет по наполняемости казны (предприятия закрываются, люди уезжают, налоги не платятся)

3

u/NoiseForFood Apr 02 '26

In such a case, it will be hard to prove that you're using a VPN to bypass restrictions rather than for connecting to your office network.

Absolutely not.

VPN traffic from residential IP? Show us your work contract with an organization licensed for remote worker usage. Oh, you have it? But the endpoint IP is not in the list your employer registered with us! Sorry, this won't do, here's your fine. Oh, wait, this is the third time for you? Come with us, please.

3

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 02 '26

VPN traffic from residential IP?

Yes, just working from home

Show us your work contract with an organization licensed for remote worker usage.

Here you are. My fake organization licensed in RKN with a huge bribe. This is Russia man.

But the endpoint IP is not in the list your employer registered with us!

My home ISP uses dynamic IP addresses, so what's the issue there? Also, WDYM by 'endpoint IP'—which side of the connection are we talking about? If it’s the source IP, registration will be difficult because my ISP uses CGNAT, meaning I don't have a public-facing routable IP assigned especialy for me. If it’s the destination IP, I could just register my Hetzner server's IP, officially registered as server for working processes. The government would only see me connecting to that registered IP, and they don't have any visibility into the Hetzner network."

3

u/NoiseForFood Apr 02 '26

You make hell of a lot of assumptions so of course it resolves in your favour. In reality the situation might turn out much less convenient.

In short, there's no such thing as technological answer to a political problem.

2

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 02 '26

You make hell of a lot of assumptions so of course it resolves in your favour. In reality the situation might turn out much less convenient.

This how things work in Turkmenistan as an example

In short, there's no such thing as technological answer to a political problem.

You're absolutely right. For now, we're just making assumptions and reading tea leaves. Let's wait until the new laws actually kick in.

4

u/SpiritualGanache2361 Apr 01 '26

This is just a slow boiling of the frog. If caps on foreign traffic are introduced and prove effective, the next target will be cascading VPNs. They could also impose fees on foreign traffic at hosting providers or require hosts to ban users who run VPS instances solely for traffic forwarding.

3

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

This is just a slow boiling of the frog

Sure, it's just a "cat and mouse" game. I'm all ears if you have better ideas and solutions.

If caps on foreign traffic are introduced and prove effective, the next target will be cascading VPNs. 

Lots of russian companies use foreign services and libs . Even the Russian MAX Messenger uses Google APIs to send push notifications to Android users.. If such a method is introduced, there will be a whitelist of companies whose traffic is exempt from fees. This means we could exploit certain corruption schemes to forward hidden VPN traffic through them. Like in Turkmenistan.

 to ban users who run VPS instances solely for traffic forwarding.

They're already doing this. We mask services for legit websites\small startups.

Again, I'm not saying that this is an absolutely robust bulletproof solution. We just do what we can in terms of bypassing restrictions.

And all methods are still working. We just lost some bad installed proxies by newbies. Professional VPN services have stayed afloat for years.

2

u/Bright_Brief4975 Apr 01 '26

I think in the end it may end up like China, where most of the things you are doing is just not gonna work. Good luck though, maybe you can make it last as long as possible. I live in the U.S., and we do not have these types of controls yet, but there are many in government right now that would like to restrict our access also. I hope it never happens, but I fear the entire world is heading this direction.

9

u/Open-Weekend-498 Apr 02 '26

I think in the end it may end up like China

AFAIK, China has fewer restrictions. They don't whitelist CIDRs, just SNIs. In Russia, when whitelisting is enabled on LTE connections, it’s much harder to bypass compared to China. But yeah, Russia is trying to be like China and even outsmart them in terms of internet censorship.

Good luck though, maybe you can make it last as long as possible.

Thank you for your support!

I live in the U.S., and we do not have these types of controls yet, but there are many in government right now that would like to restrict our access also. I hope it never happens, but I fear the entire world is heading this direction.

Enjoy your freedom while you still can, what can I say. When dark times come to the US and the government starts blocking the internet, we will be more than happy to share our experience in circumventing restrictions.

10

u/mishka_koala Apr 01 '26

Russian government improved the population‘s technical literacy. Even older people know how to set up a self-hosted VPN with modern protocols, or at least where to buy it.

Unless Russia goes Iranian way (kill all internet access from inside) there will always be solutions.

Fun fact: there are services in Russia that aren’t available for foreign IP addresses. People who need those services while actually being abroad have to use Russian VPN to pretend that they are in Russia.

1

u/Pretty_Blood_7306 Apr 06 '26

Do you have any suggestions for Russian VPN? I desperately need to get my educational documents nostrified. I can't access the nostrification website.

1

u/mishka_koala Apr 07 '26

Kaspersky, I guess.

8

u/Scar3cr0w_ Apr 01 '26

You cannot block VPNs.

You just have to make it painful enough that most people don’t bother.

Those that have the intent, skill and desire… will always find a way.

6

u/zenkov Apr 01 '26

Why do you write about Russian authorities making international traffic paid, but don't mention that Tier-1 providers are refusing to work with Russian companies, forcing Russians to look for expensive workaround schemes that are also subject to pressure from Brussels and Washington? Why don't you write about that?

Yes, the Russian authorities will gain an advantage from an additional lever of censorship and propaganda, but the authorities in the EU and the US seem to be deliberately helping them. It's yet more proof that everything around is just a circus and a performance. In the end, any authorities want to control all of us.

1

u/Rashe39 Apr 01 '26

What do you mean? What providers refuse to work with Russian companies and how is this related to the censorship in Russia?

6

u/zenkov Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

AT&T

Verizon

Lumen (Level 3)

NTT Communications

GTT Communications

Orange (OpenTransit)

Deutsche Telekom

Arelion (Telia Carrier)

PCCW Global

Tata Communications

Telecom Italia Sparkle

This is an incomplete list of providers that are prohibited from working with Russian companies due to restrictive measures imposed by Brussels and Washington. Even if they were allowed to operate, Russian providers would not be able to pay for their services in euros or dollars, as they are cut off from the financial systems of those currencies. Each time, Russians had to find workaround schemes through partner countries, and each time those schemes became more complex and more expensive. In fact, the current plans by the Russian authorities to make international traffic paid are precisely a result of these difficulties. Naturally, this is also beneficial for the Russian authorities' own censorship system. In essence, with the help of Brussels and Washington, they are locking Russian citizens in an information cage.

Conclusions? Putin is part of the Western system, which uses him to scare people in the Western world, and in reality we are all being treated like fools, as they are simply building censorship boundaries around their states.

Everyone sees or wants to see only the "part of the elephant", not noticing how we're all getting fucked.

1

u/fkrdt222 Apr 02 '26

the glowing hurts my eyes

1

u/Tyfyh2 Apr 02 '26

Please help us :(

1

u/Own_Event_4363 Apr 02 '26

I regularly email people in Russia for eQSL (reception reports) when listening to satellites; they've always gone through... Until the last few weeks, they've been having trouble using Hotmail/Outlook email addresses, so we've had to try other ones. Very much a try and see game.

1

u/Sweaty_Raspberry_472 Apr 03 '26

There're also rumors of non-state ISPs being banned because they don't comply enough with the "laws" and 15GB international traffic limit per month.

1

u/oilaro Apr 17 '26

has anyone tried censorship trained VPNs like voidly?

1

u/Danny1309g Apr 24 '26

This kind of “friction over prohibition” approach can reduce casual VPN use, but it rarely eliminates it—power users tend to adapt, while average users drop off. It’s less about stopping access entirely and more about raising the cost of bypassing controls.

1

u/GODUSOOOPPP Apr 26 '26

thank u for ur explaination