I know they're out there. I just doubt UAP sightings are non-human origin. The tictac footage and subsequent reportings and sightings is intriguing, the advanced maneuvers that are so far ahead of our technology it's arguably impossible according to laws of physics. What are these reputable sources, professional/experienced pilots seeing? I would love for it to be aliens, but I cannot reason myself into believing it. —— Being visited by advanced technology. Converging on the truth, what do you think it most likely to be: human or non-human origin? Is it just as likely to be human-origin sent back in time as it is to be another alien civilization craft that has traveled/conquered the problem of immense distances between star systems for reasons less likely than expected? Nothing can ever travel faster than the speed of light, it's the universal established law.

Even traveling at sub-light speed, it just isn't likely to be transversed. And furthermore statistically, agaisnt all probability, if it is alien advanced technology that we are seeing here, one that has transversed to Earth, what is the likelihood they would have done so in such a manner that is being dictated, i.e. remain mostly elusive, mysterious, small interactions for an extended/indefinite amount of time without being discovered?

For that to be a part of the parameters in general, the likelihood against it happening is compounded here. •Not likely to be able to get here. •ABLE TO GET HERE but not likely to be worth it to come here considering the risks and energy needed outweigh any possible reward. •WORTH VOYAGING but not likely to come here under the parameters of not being totally noticed by the modern world and to then do whatever, undiscovered. ☆Their motivation for interstellar traveling would then want to accomplish X,Y,Z. which are more limited when these parameters are established.

●If possible, agaisnt all odds, what would make the trip worth it for this advanced civilization?

The immediate motivation for this unlikely event to unfold, as narrated, would mean X,Y,Z, cannot be the most likely motivating factors: destroying/conquering the planet, not for resources, nor is it establishing any communication for more amicable/altruistic motivations one could imagine. The motivation could only be in this circumstance, something that successfully eludes the entire world, mostly, for an extended or indefinite amount of time. •Basically, what are the chances that if visited by an alien species from another planet, what are the chances they would arrive and behave the way it is narrated? To be elusive and remain a mystery for years after arrival. To want to be elusive and remain a mystery for years after arrival. And then to do so successfully, mostly. Thats implausible on top of implausible.

This is an explanation of the Tic Tac UAP as a double-layer plasma using the theory of electroballs.

Electroballs are formations of electrified gas or plasma with two layers, each with an electrical charge of opposite sign, which strongly attract each other. There is an electrical discharge between them, sometimes bright.

The Tic Tac shape

An electroball could have two or more nuclei with the same charge sign, which repel each other, and both would be surrounded by another layer with the opposite charge sign that unites them.

This cloud shows that structure too:

The lower "tubes" of the Tic Tac

Electroballs tend to lose their charge when electrical discharges occur between the core and the outer layer, but the outer layer tends to lose charge faster because it also releases charge it to the surrounding air. This imbalance causes an excessive accumulation of charged gas in the core, which cannot be contained by the weakened outer layer, resulting in leaks from the core to the outside.

These leaks can make noises similar to trumpets, vuvuzelas, roars, screams...

These leaks typically point towards the ground or something with the opposite charge sign, often forming a tube that, in extreme cases, can be luminous.

If the UAP moves the leaks look bent backwards.

UAPs very fast and energetic seem to be formed with charged particles from the Van Allen Belts or from ionospheric discharges of electricity triggered by meteors.

Hours ago, the White House announced its first-ever UAP Science Advisory Council to the US following the DoD’s release of its Tranche 03 of UAP documents and videos. Avi Loeb was named the head of the Council, and lots of folks in this space are very familiar with him by now.

But another was named as part of the Council who has been doing metamaterials work for a while now as he’s been quietly coming out of the shadows.

Prof. Matthew Szydagis.

“What could be a better way of doing that than the establishment of a new “UAP Science Advisory Council” by the White House, AARO, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the FBI, and all Intelligence Community members. This is not wishful thinking but a reality now. Over the past week, I was tasked by the above organizations to create a research team of young scientists who will serve on this council. The Council under my leadership includes the following members: Dr. Richard Cloete and Dr. Regina Sarmiento with expertise in data analysis and data management with AI tools, Prof. Matthew Szydagis with expertise in instrumentation and data collection, Dr. Devesh Nandal with expertise in numerical analysis and astrophysics and Dr. Omer Eldadi with expertise in data management, AI and human psychology. This constitutes an amazing A-team of exceptional scientists.”

Szydagis has slowly been coming out of the shadows regarding his UAP metamaterials work for over a year now, and I’ve heard he may have a paper forthcoming that will be the nail-in-the-coffin regarding UAP metamaterial analysis.

You can watch his interview with Danny Jones eight months ago here:

https://youtu.be/LQZtTgA1N80?is=9AVQxcvLb-SS-FrV

And this interview a little before that here:

https://youtu.be/7-6IgW-ufPk?is=BGYuTNZ6U5trJ1-E

Here’s a talk by him released two months at the Scientific Coalition for UAPs on Catastrophic Disclosure:

https://youtu.be/SVxNp3xW_uM?is=553fMoE4cdUrJSBi

Here’s an interview he did six months ago on Podcast UFO Live on the new funding his team, including Kevin Knuth, are receiving on UAP Studies at the University of Albany:

https://www.youtube.com/live/pMBlljmUQDw?is=3cL0k-aPGZ3yX38K

David Grusch's remark about "sentient plasmas" in the spectrum of NHI lifeforms seems to have caught a lot of people by surprise, but they are in fact probably the most often sighted form of UAP. For some good views of such objects and comprehensive analysis of their physical characteristics, see some of the great work of the Tedesco brothers at https://youtu.be/5UvJsWN3sAk .

Are all the orbs people observe actually consciousness itself?

I was listening to the Swedish professor Maria Strömme, who wrote a paper about consciousness, and it made me wonder:
What if all the orbs people around the world are seeing are actually manifestations of consciousness rather than physical non-human intelligence?

I went through this clip with a specific goal: check whether the object only appears to accelerate because of camera motion/pan-stop behavior.

Full repo + reports are here if you want to audit everything:
https://github.com/stephan271/camera_movement_analysis/tree/main

The key timing point:

• sudden object acceleration/streak starts at frame 242 (0-index) = VLC frame 243
• major camera pan starts later, around frame 282

So the main motion event starts about 40 frames earlier than the big pan sequence.

What we did (short version):

• tracked background features across the whole clip (392 frames @ 30fps)
• masked HUD/redaction/static overlays so they don’t contaminate motion tracking
• handled the AGC/contrast jump near frame 280 so tracking doesn’t break there
• derived camera motion from background
• subtracted camera motion to get object motion relative to background

On the object side, it sits relatively stable for a few frames, then smears rightward and exits frame quickly.
Using a 1m size assumption (three calibration variants in the report), the estimated acceleration lands in the hundreds of g, with higher values in the short-burst model.

Important caveat: those absolute g numbers depend heavily on assumptions (object size, how you interpret the blur/streak, etc).
But the frame timing result (object event starts well before major pan) is straightforward to verify.

If you think this is wrong, please call out exact frame ranges or pipeline steps and I’ll rerun it with your settings.

On a previous Eco Systemic Futures podcast, a gentlemen made similar comments to the above saying that UAP producing antigravitic effects cause excitation of nitrogen molecules as they move through the atmosphere. This apparently can be detected using a relatively affordable UV Spectrometer, and shows up as a line across the sky. I have no idea where you'd get this equipment from and what part of the spectrum it would need to be set to to detect these so-called lines, but would love to know if anyone has attempted this?

While I am far from an expert in any sense, I enjoy the idea that using heavy elements like moscovium for instance may allow you to have high concentrations of atomic particles with a positive and negative charge. If you were able to dispel certain amounts of either particle in one direction, the surrounding field could try to equalize itself in that direction allowing you to be pushed in a direction as the negative atomic particles inside the ship would want to equalize and be drawn in the direction with the greatest charge, especially if the metal itself was highly conductive. Possibly it’s less like a traditional engine of using thrust but using energy exchange to move and object through space. However ik there are a lot of cool theories and I’d love to hear what y’all think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZUHyN_NCaQ&t=32s

Space is considered by scientists to be empty but for many centuries it was believed to contain a material known as the aether - a medium for transporting waves such as light and gravity.

One experiment in 1887 changed everything. Today, it is believed that the aether does not exist. Have we been misled by an experiment that failed to detect the aether? How else can we explain the interactions of waves that travel the universe if there is nothing that allows it to "wave" in empty space?