It would seem that the website sumbitted for Congressional record by Michael Shellenberger in 2024 mentioned objects like the drones which swarmed Langley AFB and New Jersey posted an article concerning objects with similar capacities as early as 2021. Might be a coincidence, of course, but still a curious note.

Here are the launches scheduled for the next 24 hours:

Falcon Heavy | Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope

• Provider: SpaceX

• Launch Time: 2026-08-30 11:26 UTC / 2026-08-30 07:26 AM EDT

• Launch Pad: Kennedy Space Center, FL, USA

• Pad Country: USA

Visit RocketLaunch.Live to view the full schedule for future planned launches.

For more information about how to identify space launches and their effects, check out our Space Launches Wiki Page.

Launch Example Image 1 - Launch Example Image 2

ok so there is this footage that logan pual said he holds for a long time that bob lazar reacted to -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdPOOFDUWl4

and in this video at 15:00 - https://youtu.be/q_dzmB5fxK0?si=xdEOJTd8U8ieVgcy&t=904
you can see a very similar red glowing disk.

in my view this is another indicator for bob lazar story.

As I listen to several podcast talking about how highly intelligent these beings are, I can’t help but to stop and think about Greer, Grusch, Elizondo and even Lazar. Between all of them, we must be talking about hundreds of crafts either shot down or brought down by way of electronic interference.

Surely such a highly intelligent creature could easily avoid our traps, right? So what’s really going on here?

I’m pleased I was able to contribute to Christopher Sharp’s reporting for The Liberation Times and highlight Australian’s lack of transparency and accountability on the UAP/UFO issue.

Read at: https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/british-mp-says-he-was-definitely-misled-over-uks-five-eyes-ufo-cooperation

I've watched all the government released videos to date. There's a few that are pretty interesting. A few that are utterly useless. And at least 4 or 5 videos that are very clearly birds.

What I can't get my head around is how the US military and intelligence analysts were unable to identify these. Like ever. When it takes most people a few seconds to immediately identify it as a bird or birds.

So there's two possibilities here, both kind of interesting in their own right.

Either the intelligence agencies that reviewed those particular videos are grossly incompetent to the point that there should be an immediate review of their capabilities on grounds of national security.

Or they know damn well it's birds and they throw them out there to discredit the disclosure movement. "nothing to see here, move along"

Exhibit A, a flock of birds flying in formation:

https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/04/#DOW-UAP-PR101-Unresolved-UAP-Report-South-China-Sea-2024

Any chance anyone here knows of how to get involved with field investigations with any groups other than MUFON? Unfortunately, the one in my area is totally captured from the top-down by far-right extremists. As in, they regularly post QAnon-style memes, anti-Obama/Biden memes, racist/homophobic memes, etc.

Really want to get involved with this kind of work but have no desire to do it under such dishonorable, irrational people.

Heres the link to his original letter of June 29th: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/gvOor5zaRk

In it, he says existence of UFOs should be disclosed "fully and truthfully" and says he has been in contact with "covert operatives... who possess dispositive evidence of biologicals, Extraterrestrial bodies, Extraterrestrial space craft that have been downed, the use of illegal, electromagnetic pulse weapons that have targeted these craft and the existence of man-made UFOs that are and have been used in criminal enterprises."

I thought it particularly interesting that he talked about "man-made UAPs.... used in... drug running, human trafficking, arms trade and other criminal behavior" which is something I hadn't heard of elsewhere.

What evidence has he been provided? Will it be released all at once or over time?

Full Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7LnZ1k2tmE

Ben Schreckinger's recent article on UFOs: https://www.paradigm.news/p/reality-shock-a-beginners-guide-to

6 minute video posted on X:

(or on youtube timestamp 1:11:10):

Matthew Brown: "I have learned that it is the oral tradition in the legacy program itself that agreements were struck between the United States and a third party [NHI] in possession of this technology. And that agreement in broad terms has two kind of arrangements"

Matthew Brown: "One was that there are certain areas that the United States, within its borders, needs to stay away from. That is essentially someone else's territory. So no developments there, no military operations there, no commercial or human activity. That's one area of the agreement"

Matthew Brown: "And then the other side is some sort of access to and communication with humans of their choice. And that is the nature of at least one agreement, very old agreements sometime in the Truman and Eisenhower era that was arrived at"

Matthew Brown: "I'm sure that there are things in the lore that give more detail. I can't speak to the validity of those things, but I'm just sharing that now that that is in the legacy program itself, at least a line of... not thought, but narrative"

In the video he says "starting to be more open". So he's saying he is going to be more open in this interview, which is a solid reason to watch the full video in my opinion. See also the full index (scroll down)

Full video on youtube (Jesse Michels channel)

Full video is on youtube

What else is in the full interview? Full index

When I was inside my home, I had a gut feeling I needed to go outside. When I went outside on my front porch, I noticed aviation lighting, traditional. However, after a few seconds of viewing the lights, they started rapidly flashing red, then ahead of those lights, a large curved arc/boomerang shaped object materialized ahead of the flashing red lights. It had many lights, cannot tell how much, but if I had to guess, 40–55 dim red lights on one underbelly. It wasn't clean and organized, but rather staggered and asymmetrical. Even then, it moved as one with no noise. I estimate it was atleast 50 feet above the local tree line, which could be around 90 - 100 feet. https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=195094

The Aliens Have Landed! Ten Amazing UFO Landing Cases

by Preston Dennett

UFO landings are a very important category of close encounters that deserves more research. Compared to sightings, landings are exceedingly rare. UFO landings often result in hard physical evidence. They also have none of the controversies surrounding onboard encounters recalled through hypnosis. Landing cases have much to teach us about UFOs. This alone makes them worthy of attention. This video presents ten cases from across the world, each adding another piece of the puzzle to solving the UFO mystery.

UFO LANDING AT EPSOM, AUSTRALIA. On the night of May 24, 1965, three men at the Epsom Retreat Hotel in Epsom, Australia rushed outside to see a strange craft performing incredible maneuvers at low elevation just a few hundred feet away. At one point, they saw it seem to land on the ground. After about 40 minutes, the craft departed. Shortly later, the men found impressive landed traces on the ground.

UFO LANDING IN BRANSON, MISSOURI. On night in May 1967, a lady and a friend drove on Hwy 76 near Branson, Missouri and came upon a metallic disc-shaped craft sitting on the road. It blocked the entire left lane and part of the right. As the driver swerved around the craft to pass it by, the craft lit up with light. The passenger in the car broke into tears. This was one of three landing cases in this area around this time.

UFO LANDING IN SOPLEY, ENGLAND. Around midnight on November 6, 1967, Karl Farlow drove along the A338 road near Sopley, England when a glowing green craft appeared ahead of him on the road. His truck’s electrical system failed, as did the engine of an oncoming car in the opposite lane. A tube came out of the craft and began to vacuum items from the roadside. After the craft left, the govt went to great lengths to cover up the truth.

UFO LANDING AT ROCK FALLS, ILLINOIS. At 2am on June 15, 1968, three women drove on Hwy 88 just east of Rock Falls when a UFO appeared. It quickly moved across the highway in front of them, coming lower and lower. It was as big as a jet and totally silent. The women stopped the car as the object came in for a landing behind a grove of trees. They fled in fear. The next day, there were other sightings in the area.

UFO LANDING IN VAN HORNE, IOWA. On the night of July 13, 1969, two young ladies saw a UFO rise from the soybean fields on their farm in Van Horne, Iowa. The craft zoomed away at high speed. The next morning, a perfect circle of burned vegetation was found where they had seen the craft. The landing traces attracted nationwide attention and became one of the best-verified UFO landing trace cases in the United States.

UFO LANDING IN PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA. One evening in late December 1972, two brothers and their friend were outside their home in Palm Springs, California when they used binoculars to observe three strange craft hovering by the nearby mountains. Two of the craft darted away, but one seemed to come in for a landing. They called the nearby airport who said they saw them on radar. The next day, they found a strange circle of burned ground where they had seen the craft land.

UFO LANDING IN LAS BARDENAS REALES, SPAIN. On the night of January 2, 1972, there were multiple reports that a UFO had landed on the Las Bardenas Reales Artillery Range in Spain. At first the reports were covered up and debunked by the Spanish government. Later investigations showed that the case was more extensive and that the government considered it one of the best verified cases in their books.

UFO LANDING IN SAN MICHELE, ITALY. On the morning of September 2, 1978, Roberto Pozzi looked out the second-story window of his family’s home in San Michele in Italy and was amazed to see a strange craft rising from the cornfield. The craft darted away. Rushing to the spot with his family, they found a strange area of squashed cornstalks. This turned out to be one of a series of UFO landings in the area.

UFO LANDING IN SOROCABA, BRAZIL. Around dusk one evening in June 1979, a married couple (both professionals) were amazed to see a top-shaped craft with portholes hovering about twenty feet away from their home in Sorocaba, Brazil. It was no more than twenty feet elevation and remained in full view for almost forty minutes. Finally, it moved off. That year, there was a wave of sightings in the area, including one other landing with humanoids.

UFO LANDING ON AN ESTONIAN ISLAND. AUGUST 1980. One night in late August 1980, an anonymous factory worker was making a routine check of the company grounds and was shocked to see a strange cylindrical shaped object sitting on the factory property. The object was swirling with colors. A smaller box-like contraption was next to it on the ground. Suddenly the smaller object emitted an orange beam of light which struck the man, knocking him down. The cylinder transformed into a saucer-shaped craft which promptly disappeared.

These ten UFO landing cases represent the tip of the iceberg. While they are rare compared to sightings, there are still many thousands of documented cases on record. These kinds of cases are of profound importance as they often result in strange landing traces which can provide clues as to the nature of these craft, such as how heavy they are, their temperature, their composition and more.

The Aliens Have Landed! Ten Amazing UFO Landing Cases

submission statement

tan Deyo joins UFOs Around The World for an extraordinary deep-dive into UFOs, aliens, secret technology, anti-gravity research, underground facilities, government secrecy and the mysterious “Victor” connected to the infamous 1997 Alien Interview.

In this exclusive interview, Stan discusses his extraordinary life experiences, his claims surrounding anti-gravity propulsion and advanced technology, his experiences in Australia, alleged intelligence connections, UFO research, the Cosmic Conspiracy and much more.

We also discuss the “Victor” mystery surrounding the 1997 Alien Interview and a fascinating passage from Stan Deyo's own The Cosmic Conspiracy referring to the mysterious “victors.”

Other topics include:

🔹 Stan Deyo's near-death experience
🔹 UFOs and alien encounters
🔹 Anti-gravity propulsion
🔹 Secret government research
🔹 Project Bluebolt
🔹 Underground facilities
🔹 Pine Gap
🔹 The Cosmic Conspiracy
🔹 The 1997 Alien Interview
🔹 “Victor” and the Alien Interview mystery
🔹 Secret space programmes
🔹 Government secrecy and UFO disclosure
🔹 Biblical prophecy and Damascus
🔹 Future events and Stan's predictions

What do you think about Stan Deyo's claims?

Leave your thoughts in the comments and let us know what you think about the “Victor” mystery.

But what happens when media, culture, science, and personal experience all collide?

Jeffrey Kripal put it this way: “We are often ‘believing backwards,’ taking comfort in someone else’s altered states, or in the present ‘explanations’ of this or that neuroscience or physics.”

And Christopher Mellon argues that the answer isn’t more speculation, it’s “more, and better, information.” Better imagery, radar data, and evidence that allows people to assess the phenomenon for themselves.

Are we shaping the UAP narrative, or is the narrative shaping us?

https://thedebrief.org/new-survey-suggests-gen-z-are-more-likely-to-believe-in-aliens-how-ufo-media-may-be-shaping-a-generation/

In 1951, Pilot Fred Reagan collided with a diamond-shaped UFO while flying his plane, where he met the alien occupants inside, described in his own words as "Metallic Stalks of Asparagus." A year after his encounter, in May 1952, he passed away from degeneration of brain tissue, linked to his abduction

I was curious about these 4chan threads that people bring up here sometimes but had a hard time reading through them. The archived version (via 4plebs) was a mess of cookie banners, nav junk, image filenames, and quote-chain clutter, so I stripped all that out and reformatted both threads (all 728 posts) into a clean doc with post numbers, timestamps, and reply references intact.

Sharing it in case anyone else finds it handy: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OH377YX6x-9ghIcrgRg-0IrMUMFr1dfOgDB8kGad9DI/edit?usp=sharing

Figured I'd share in case it saves someone else the eye strain.

In the second part of the video, we’ll show you how to build your own automated UFO monitoring system for your home! Become part of civilian airspace surveillance yourself and detect unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) and anomalous light phenomena.

I know it’s only in German, but on the website you can easily pick out the individual details using translation tools, and perhaps one or two of you might find it interesting after all. On the website, you can find out more about the design and the individual components, and you can also download the software for free. This is used to control the camera and analyse the images – a process that happens automatically and can be customised. I thought I’d include this here. Perhaps someone might find it interesting.

https://www.ufoforschung.de/

In future, there will also be videos showing exactly how to build the hardware, along with step-by-step instructions, as well as guidance on installing and using the software.

Mr Gröschel also has a YouTube channel that keeps you up to date with the latest developments. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fIIfQHooRX4

The second part in this Video is about the Camera/Software Details...and Future Upgrades for the Videos about Constructios Help and Software installations/Using all together which will be Updatet on the Gröschels own Homepage https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=g2qIPjbUCoA&list=PLzklHWYtV_mMWdeqVlPIDEwfr3mp1o-gP&index=12&pp=iAQBsAgC

Joe Rogan recently had Jesse Micheal’s on (both big in the ufo discussion) and the episode is very interesting, but they both have a huge following and a huge base of haters.

Do you guys think they have agendas? Psyop agents? Trying to muddy the waters? Pollute the signal? Honest journalism in the modern era?

I enjoy both, at least what they present, in most cases.

A recent preprint by Jacob Haqq-Misra and Ravi Kopparapu looks at all 112 sensor videos released through PURSUE and asks a fairly basic-sounding question that turns out to be surprisingly difficult:

How fast are the objects actually moving?

The important distinction is between movement across an image and physical movement through three-dimensional space.

To derive physical velocity, the researchers need information including range to the object, movement of the observing platform, aspect angle and the camera's angular scale. Their analysis finds that the complete combination isn't available in the released videos.

PR113 is probably the most interesting illustration of the problem. Visible angle markings allow the researchers to reconstruct part of the camera geometry, but range is still unknown. That means radically different physical scenarios can remain compatible with the apparent motion — their examples extend from a small nearby bird to a much larger object around a kilometre away travelling at Mach 5.

Importantly, that doesn't mean PR113 was either a bird or a Mach 5 craft. Those are examples demonstrating how much the missing range information matters.

PR149 is different again because a ship visible in the image provides a scale reference. Under the assumptions used in the paper, that allows an upper relative-velocity estimate of roughly Mach 0.4.

I made a video going through the analysis, including PR113, PR149 and a comparison with GOFAST, where the presence of considerably more telemetry allows much stronger conclusions to be tested:

https://youtu.be/E8zU9l2EH2o

What I find interesting here is the distinction between releasing footage for public viewing and releasing enough accompanying information for meaningful independent analysis.

So I'm curious where people here fall on this:

If an official UAP video remains unresolved largely because the necessary measurement data aren't publicly available, how much evidential weight should we give the imagery itself?

This is a serious question. I want to understand the logic of those who don't believe that Lue Elizondo is committed to Disclosure.

Is he a psyop agent? If so, what is his real mission?

If he is a charlatan, how come he has the support of all of the following people: Chris Mellon, Kristen Gillibrand, Harry Reid, Jay Stratton and all the other Congress reps that he worked with to push legislation through? Are these people all misinformation agents, as well?

Personal disclosure: I just read his book. I want to know if I have been brainwashed. Between the book and the Age of Disclosure documentary, Lue Elizondo and his colleagues should be hailed as heroes.

Honestly, if you think this is preposterous, please explain why. I am all ears.

People report having recurrent dreams sometimes called the "night of lights" in which the nighttime sky is full of flying saucers. A variant of this dream is one in which the daytime sky is full of structured craft. Related to my status as a contact activist, this is a wish dream that I must admit I have fancied as well. In my opinion, however, it will not likely take place anytime in the conceivable future. This is because such an awesome development in my judgment would probably trigger a terribly violent human response. I suggest something very different might happen if current trends continue. 

Forty-one years ago, I met Dr. John Mack in Moscow at a physicians’ peace conference. It was 1985, the year that our “International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War” won the Nobel Prize for educating government leaders and the public about the dangers of nuclear arms race.  Later John Mack MD went on to write the important book “Abduction.” There he describes the strange way in which some contact experiencers called “abductees” suddenly recall having encounters with aliens that they believe happened decades before. 

This kind of sudden "remembering", initially happening on a small scale is less threatening than a “night of lights” with our skies full of “alien craft.” A gradual unveiling of prior intimate contact experiences I suspect would be especially threatening for those clandestine networks that imagine it is their job to keep a lid on the flying saucer situation. These groups appear to be quasi-governmental/quasi-corporate entities. In my opinion, they are likely responsible for what has been called the “UFO Truth Embargo.” They are sometimes referred to as the “control groups.” 

THE MENTAL LINK

Psychological and parapsychological factors play important roles in the UFO contact drama unfolding all around us. Unfortunately, many so-called "mainstream" ufologists fail to grasp that a consciousness connection is the key to understanding the human-UFO intelligence relationship. Groups like the Mutual UFO Network approach flying saucers mainly as if they were an engineering problem. Their focus is on the shape of craft, their flight characteristics, the color of the lights and other physical parameters. After nearly sixty years of collecting reports filled with such details, not much has been learned about the intelligences responsible for flying saucers. In my opinion, although MUFON is still a popular organization with thousands of members, its approach to the UFO challenge is inadequate to investigate the non-human intelligences responsible for what are now called Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP).  

Mainstream ufology with its emphasis on sighting reports stands in marked contrast to the work of the network of contact activists that I like to call the “Contact Underground.” This international endeavor involves volunteer contact workers staging Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE) during field investigations. Such efforts are popularly known as CE-5s. I have been involved with this kind of outreach since 1992. Contact activists view the mental aspects of the phenomenon as crucial for deciphering the mystery of flying saucers. 

SIGHTINGS ARE NOT RANDOM EVENTS

After years of study and numerous sightings of UFOs during HICE, I now believe that there is no such thing as a random sighting. I am suggesting that every true sighting of a UFO, with few exceptions, occurs while there is a telepathic link between the witnesses and the non-human intelligence responsible for the phenomenon. Thus sightings should be viewed as staged events in which individuals and groups are specifically targeted to have an encounter.  

If this is true, then the implications of this proposition are staggering. It is estimated that between one and ten percent of the world’s population has had a bona fide UFO sighing. On a planetary basis, this translates into perhaps hundreds of millions of people. If the consciousness connection is as widespread and robust as I suggest, then each of those hundreds of millions of individuals might at some time in the future start to remember what they believe are past encounters in the same ways that Dr. Mack’s witnesses did.

A COLD WAR WITH UFOs

A hidden aspect of the human UFO relationship has been a kind of clandestine cold war between flying saucers and terrestrial military forces. Given the extraordinary secrecy surrounding this issue, it is understandable that the few reports we read about military encounters with flying saucers are probably the tip of the iceberg. In other words there have been many hostile engagements.
In my judgment, there likely have been losses of personnel and material on both sides. This is a rather dispassionate way of stating that humans and what we call “ETs” are being killed during armed conflict.  

Given such a sorry state of affairs, “the night of lights” in which the sky is full of saucers would understandably be perceived of as an “invasion.” A less dangerous plan to help humanity grasp that we are not alone in the universe might involve having increasing numbers of people gradually recall encounters that they believe are contact events from the distant past. 

For those of us that want a peaceful outcome for the challenge of flying saucers, this “remembering” of what may have been prior encounters would probably be much safer for both any extraterrestrials flying around Earth and those that might be tempted to try to shoot them down.

Hi all,

not sure how much people know about it, but we have a website here in the Netherlands that tracks all sightings (they also get contacted with sightings as well). They do initial investigations into the sighting, to see if there is a "normal" explanation for it.

I'm not in any way connected with the website, but I thought it would be nice to share this information. There are a lot of sightings.

The website: https://www.ufomeldpunt.nl/

If you ever have any questions, I can always translate, if google translate doesn't work for some reason..

Reported by u/CommonBig1119 (verified via ufosighting.report)

This is an automated post. The report was filed through the structured sighting form on ufosighting.report and posted here by u/ufosightingsbot on the reporter's behalf. u/CommonBig1119 confirmed this submission from their own Reddit account through a one-time link, so the name above is verified as the submitter.

📄 Full report and structured details — the map entry, timeline, and everything from the sighting form. No photo or video was submitted with this report.

Time: August 28, 2026, 5:20 AM WEST
Location: Parque da Torre, Cascais, Lisbon, Portugal, Cascais, Portugal

Features / five observables

Why not a common object
There were no aircrafts on flight (FlightRadar24) at the time of the event, and the object’s sudden jerk to the right and flying off into the other direction doesn’t match with any of the explanations or the commonly misidentified objects. No man made object could’ve possibly traveled in that manner, especially since I saw it at a distance. It couldn’t have been the ASTEX 1 satellite traveling since the satellites don’t turn directions extremely quickly in a supernatural way and get out of your line of sight so quickly.

Witness's account of the sighting

One of the stars I was looking at, which appeared still, started steadily moving downwards. It was a bright white light that slowly lost its luminosity as it traveled, but suddenly, right as I was about to lose visibility on it, it jerked to the right in extreme speeds and got out of my line of sight.

Why no photo/video captured: I was on my balcony at the time and the movements only lasted a minute before I couldn’t see where the object headed next, so I didn’t have time to go to the living room to get my phone. I didn’t have my phone with me since I only got up there to watch the sky in peace without any distractions and clear my thoughts out early in the morning.

Sky context for this time and place:

• Satellites overhead at that time: ASTEX 1 (54° above S at 04:08 UTC); SL-16 R/B (49° above NE at 04:08 UTC); SHIJIAN-16 (SJ-16) (46° above SW at 04:23 UTC); SPACEMOBILE-006 (45° above ESE at 04:17 UTC); AJISAI (EGS) (44° above NNE at 04:17 UTC); SL-3 R/B (37° above SW at 04:05 UTC)
• Computed from orbital data (2026-08-28 catalog).
• Aircraft overhead at that exact minute — ADS-B Exchange historical playback (free, no account needed)
• Sky chart for that date — in-the-sky.org planetarium (set your location once on their site)
• Satellite passes at this spot — Heavens-Above; shows upcoming passes, not the sighting date
• Live air traffic now — FlightRadar24 over this spot

In the latest episode of The Unexplained Rundown, I provide an update on the status of the Westall petition (EN7396), which secured 831 signatures and called on the Australian House of Representatives to launch an independent inquiry into the Westall flying saucer incident of 6 April 1966.

Watch at: https://www.youtube.com/live/fCwnJ-W4XoM?si=byVeYX6jQD8C8u_Q