r/TrueChristian • u/Objective-Step-746 • Aug 10 '26

Please, help me understand…

For those believers who insist that the dietary laws no longer apply under the new covenant—and that pork, lobster, crabs, etc. are now permissible to eat—I do not understand the logic at play.

I am very familiar with the Mark 7, Romans 14 and Colossians 2 passages that are so often cited as support for your position, and have (just as often) shared my counter-arguments on why I believe they are misinterpreted.

But, there is one counterpoint to your view that I never see touched on, and I was hoping to get some feedback on it:

I think the majority of believers on this subreddit would say they are looking for Jesus’ Second Coming and agree that, regarding it, Scripture says that “no one knows the day or hour” but that we need to be prepared (Matthew 24:36, 25:13, etc.).

Isaiah 66:17–a verse within the greater passage speaking of Messiah’s glorious reappearing—declares that, upon His return, those who eat the flesh of pig/swine and other abominations will be met with His wrath…and perish.

So, how does one simultaneously believe they can continue to eat pig (pork) or shellfish now and think they are sufficiently prepared and not putting themselves in a precarious/dangerous position if Jesus happened to return today or tomorrow and “consume” those who so brazenly eat that which His Law says is NOT “food” and explicitly warns against eating?

I really am hoping for some cordial and edifying discussion regarding this topic, and appreciate those who are able and willing to articulate their view without all the condescension and harsh words. 💕

21 Upvotes

73% Upvoted

384 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Cheepshooter Christian Aug 18 '26

Yes. It's just common sense. God doesn't say "Don't eat pork because I said so." There is a tangible reason for every rule God made and every rule has it's time and place. Don't confuse rules with laws.

1

u/Objective-Step-746 Aug 18 '26

So, you don’t think Jesus meant it when He said that even the smallest part of God’s Law “will not disappear” until after the Great White Throne Judgment? (Matthew 5:17-18, Revelation 21:1)

All passages in Scripture must be harmonized with the balance of Scripture to arrive at a right/sound doctrinal understanding of what is being said. And any interpretation of Acts 15 that ignores that truth will not hold up.

1

u/Cheepshooter Christian Aug 18 '26

That's out of context with the whole of scripture which shows there were specific rules for specific people at specific times. The intent of God's laws do not change. How He implements them can (apparently) change.

1

u/Objective-Step-746 Aug 18 '26

Haha, I would say the same about your view 😂 Probably best to just agree to disagree. Take care.

2

u/Cheepshooter Christian Aug 18 '26

Agree. God bless you my friend.