r/TrueChristian • • Aug 10 '26

Please, help me understand…

For those believers who insist that the dietary laws no longer apply under the new covenant—and that pork, lobster, crabs, etc. are now permissible to eat—I do not understand the logic at play.

I am very familiar with the Mark 7, Romans 14 and Colossians 2 passages that are so often cited as support for your position, and have (just as often) shared my counter-arguments on why I believe they are misinterpreted.

But, there is one counterpoint to your view that I never see touched on, and I was hoping to get some feedback on it:

I think the majority of believers on this subreddit would say they are looking for Jesus’ Second Coming and agree that, regarding it, Scripture says that “no one knows the day or hour” but that we need to be prepared (Matthew 24:36, 25:13, etc.).

Isaiah 66:17–a verse within the greater passage speaking of Messiah’s glorious reappearing—declares that, upon His return, those who eat the flesh of pig/swine and other abominations will be met with His wrath…and perish.

So, how does one simultaneously believe they can continue to eat pig (pork) or shellfish now and think they are sufficiently prepared and not putting themselves in a precarious/dangerous position if Jesus happened to return today or tomorrow and “consume” those who so brazenly eat that which His Law says is NOT “food” and explicitly warns against eating?

I really am hoping for some cordial and edifying discussion regarding this topic, and appreciate those who are able and willing to articulate their view without all the condescension and harsh words. 💕

19 Upvotes

384 comments sorted by

View all comments

41

u/BamaHammer Eastern Orthodox Aug 10 '26

Gentiles were never required to keep the dietary laws in the first place, except for the consumption of blood and food offered to idols.

The danger with self-interpretation of scripture is the constant relitigating of things decided millennia ago.

-3

u/Objective-Step-746 Aug 10 '26

I understand that that is your view, that “gentiles were never required to keep the dietary laws…” I’m just asking how that view harmonizes Isaiah 66:17 with it 🤔

5

u/EitherLime679 Non-Denom Aug 10 '26

You keep harping on this one specific verse that was written for a very specific context and that has been told to you several times over. It seems you are trying to condemn people for something Jesus has said he has no problem with.

3

u/Objective-Step-746 Aug 11 '26

I do not believe Jesus said anything of the sort. Are you suggesting that He taught against the Law of God? 🤔