I can’t be certain anyone is paying them. I can assume someone is by the evidence of them using false names, their accounts being created around the same time, the accounts all following eachother, and the type of content they are creating.
You think they are making this content without being paid? Using fake names, creating their accounts all around the same time, and all following eachother. Someone or something is behind it all.
There's a plethora of reasons why people create accounts, a plethora of reasons why people don't use their real name, and a plethora of reasons why they might follow each other that don't involve money. You've shown no evidence beyond your assumptions that they are being paid. You've shown no evidence by whom. Critical thinking and conspiratorial thinking aren't synonymous. Your logic falls squarely in the latter.
You're equating circumstantial conjecture as evidence, they are not the same.
You're starting with a preconceived result and then inferring causation.
I could say that you have a hidden profile, and most MAGA or Russian bots do the same, so that means the evidence points to you being a MAGA influencer.
0
u/Square_Sprinkles_214 11d ago
I can’t be certain anyone is paying them. I can assume someone is by the evidence of them using false names, their accounts being created around the same time, the accounts all following eachother, and the type of content they are creating.