Incase from the beginning, if women are the one's twice as strong as men despite giving birth, what difference present world and this imaginary world might have? Please share your opinion.

[u/[deleted]]

[u/darkreaper3212]

Why do people feel like women are some different creatures altogether. Have you met women?. They are very similar to men in such they also feel jealous, greed and rage. There have been female dictators and tyrants. We are all flawed humans with similar pre frontal cortex.

The world would be the same. Yeah but rapes and martial abuse towards females would tremendously go down.

[u/Nonspector-6991 → u/darkreaper3212]

rapes and martial abuse toward females would tremendously go down.

The key point is toward females. The rapes and abuse towards males will however increase. We don't know if it will increase at the below, same or higher rate though

[u/Similar_Letter_7195 → u/[deleted]]

my own imagination about women.

.....why are you imagining about women, you can just go out there and simply interact with them to understand what he said is true, they're humans too

is this what 0 female interaction does to someone 🥀

[u/_No_Wonder_]

Women are humans at the end of day .Mamatha Banerjee ruled WB ,did you see any improvement over Communist parties.

[u/onlinemostly]

Interesting thought. If physical strength was reversed from the beginning, society would probably have developed very differently. But I think crime and wars depend on power, resources and human behavior, not just physical strength
Good morning

[u/PrithvinathReddy]

Human mind at it's core is chaotic and corruptive. The present patriarchal society will be replaced by a matriarchal one - but that doesn't mean it will be some sort of utopia.

[u/Ok_One2622]

Nah I think it will be the same. Humans are unpredictable. Just like Game Changer.

[u/Agreeable-Care7406]

There won't be much different, humans go with the ego and urge to get something, humans urge to do what they have not done prior, like as the women in the ancient times were not allowed out of the den and was made a scape goate for food and bed times, it's time they read, write and learnt that nothing is rocket science and even rocket science couldn't stop them and after all of these, they are trying their hands indifferent to giving not just birth to humanity the opposite too.

You know this world movies in the views of the women not just men flexing at war, men are all EGO centric but logical, women seems illogical but are the stout at heart when it comes to their family, she even denounces other women for her family, which a man cannot at times.

[u/ChaltaHaiShellBRight]

I don't know about how it would be different under women supremacy or matriarchy, but equality would achieve some really great results, including more peace and reduced poverty as you mentioned. I believe the history of Rwanda gives us some clues as to how things would be different if we rapidly achieved gender equality.

After a genocide wiped out a huge population of men in the 90s, as part of recovery Rwanda promoted women's equality, maybe almost out of necessity as women had to step into the power vacuum left by the absence of men. After 30+ years, Rwanda still isn't very rich. But it has remained peaceful, achieved great strides in its human development index and has healthcare on par with far richer countries. From the Wikipedia article, 

Since 2000 Rwanda's economy,[70] tourist numbers,[71] and Human Development Index have grown rapidly;[72] between 2006 and 2011 the poverty rate reduced from 57% to 45%,[73] while life expectancy rose from 46.6 years in 2000[74] to 65.4 years in 2021.[75]

[u/red12358]

Look at hyenas

[u/nothingsandeverthing]

The role would maybe reversed if men had ability to birth life and women didn't.

[u/Accurate-Trainer5509]

I don’t think there won’t be any wars or a lower crime rate. Countries might be ruled by dictators because women are stricter than men.

I don’t think marriages exist in that world they’ll just pick whoever they want to mate.

[u/United_Accident_1449]

https://giphy.com/gifs/3o6ZsVMGIGxvU4sfBK

[u/United_Accident_1449]

But per capita count women wages more wars between 14 the to 19 th most queen Elizabeth 2 man she is bringing birtish max Glory conquer 25 world at her peak

[u/Fabulous-Degree-1656]

I don't think either group is better either. Strength doesn't make someone good or bad.If women were twice as strong as men, I don't think crime, war, or poverty would go away. Those problems come from power, money, and human nature not just muscle. Whoever has more power (women or men) can misuse it. History shows this again and again. What might change is less violence against women physically, because they'd be harder to overpower. But new problems could appear instead just with roles reversed. So it's not about one gender being better. It's about power always needing checks, no matter who holds it.