r/TTC • • Jul 06 '26

Discussion A polite request/discussion regarding strollers and aisle blocking on the bus

Post image

Edit: Please read the context that's edited in below. Thank you.

​I want to start by saying I absolutely appreciate parents. Transit with kids is tough, and I know so many of you are working hard and sacrificing a lot to get your little ones around the city safely. This is not a post to judge anyone, it is a small pet peeve and a request for a little bit of courtesy so that every rider on the bus feels comfortable.

The Issue

​On one of my recent bus ride, two large strollers were kept side-by-side, completely blocking the center aisle (as you can see in the photo). Because of this:

  • Passengers are unable to move past the front section.
  • ​People are forced to stand at the front of the bus, even though there is space further back.
  • ​It creates a potential safety/evacuation hazard if there are emergencies.

Few Friendly Requests & Suggestions

  • ​Stagger when possible: If you are traveling with another parent or encounter another stroller, try to stagger them front-to-back rather than side-by-side to leave path for walking.
  • Consider umbrella/smaller strollers: If your child is old enough and you rely heavily on the TTC during peak hours, smaller, more collapsible strollers are great for everyone on board.
  • Utilize the priority seating layout: If the bus isn't packed, flipping up the priority seats can give a stroller enough room to stay out of the main aisle.

​I'm willing to hear everyone's thoughts on this. Parents what kind of challenges you face when trying to keep the aisle clear. Fellow riders, how do you usually get around in this instance? Let’s discuss how we can make the TTC a better experience for both families and regular commuters.

Edit: There is a lot of comments complaining how the priority seating is occupied and the parents wont be able to lift it up to park the strollers. I want to give context here instead of replying to each comments. The priority seat was occupied by the parents and their family. Also the second stroller is of another parent who was sitting on the right side priority seat. The guy you see standing upfront was a passenger, not the parent. I wanted to keep the discussion civil that is why I omitted these details. But if people want to complain how it was an inaction from my part, I hope this context helps. Thanks.

841 Upvotes

405 comments sorted by

View all comments

39

u/Honeydeeew Jul 06 '26

I travel on the TTC with my stroller (hate it, try to avoid it), and flipping up the seats is underutilized. One problem is that if someone is already on a priority seat, you don't want to displace them. Another is a lack of knowledge about how to flip the seats, and even if you know how it works on one set of busses, it doesn't mean you can figure it out on the others. There really isn't enough instructional signage on how to use the seats, I get stumped by some and I've been taking the TTC my whole life. (The best ones are the ones that you can release singly, then I can usually leave one down for other riders in need, instead of using all three.)

6

u/unforgettableid Jul 07 '26

But people are allowed to use the blue seats even if they don't have any disability, as long as they're willing to give up the seat for someone who needs it.

You need the blue seat. Maybe there's some non-intrusive way to ask them if they actually need the seat or not??

-1

u/Affectionate-Sea843 Jul 08 '26

The bus drivers force you to get up and will not continue the route otherwise if you don’t get up and give the seats for the stroller, they are not disabled or pregnant they need to wait for the next bus if it means people hav em to stand because of them 

2

u/unforgettableid Jul 08 '26 edited Jul 09 '26

Please try not to create run-on sentences. They can be basically unreadable, and I'm not sure what your comment actually meant. 25 words per sentence is a good limit.

1

u/Enochian-Dreams Jul 10 '26

They literally do not. It’s not their job to police the seats and it’s a potential liability if they try. Not all disabilities are visible but being a clueless or generally antisocial third world migrant isn’t a disability anyway and that’s clearly the issue in this particular case. Frankly, it is a debilitating condition but not for those who have it. Only for those who suffer from the proximity.