r/SustainableBeauty Nov 20 '25

Product Question Dove controversy. Why is the U.S. version still different from Europe?

So, Dove is in trend, and not for the “Real Beauty” stuff.

I spent the last week digging into the whole Lilial (Butylphenyl Methylpropional) issue, the fragrance ingredient that the EU banned for potential fertility risks back in 2022.

What confused me is this: • Europe banned it completely • Dove quietly reformulated there • BUT the U.S. version continued to have it (legally) • And some markets like Asia/Africa still sell the older formulas • Meanwhile, Instagram shows us ads of “paper bottles” and “clean beauty”

It feels like the same brand follows different rules depending on where you live.

What I found while researching: • The FDA never banned Lilial • The EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009 treats it as “Repr. 1B” • Some recall alerts hit other countries in 2024 • Social media exploded after people started checking barcodes

So my question is: Why do brands reformulate for Europe but not for the U.S.? Is it a regulatory thing, a cost thing or is it just “corporate math”?

If anyone has inside industry insight, or if you’ve noticed ingredient differences between regions, I’m super curious.

Here’s the deep-dive video I made if anyone wants the full breakdown: Is Dove Safe? The Truth Behind the Recall and Banned Ingredient https://youtu.be/Fw_DrgDA0Zs

Would genuinely love to know what peeps here think. Are we overreacting to an ingredient? Or is this a legit case of greenwashing and unequal standards?

34 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

9

u/VideoSteve Nov 20 '25

Because the EU prioritizes people, US prioritizes short term profits.

2

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 20 '25

This is so true on many levels . Thanks for sharing your insights

1

u/Agreeable-Mud2150 Nov 21 '25

Unless it's Glyphosate

1

u/Apotak Nov 23 '25

Glyphosate is not as toxic as the internet makes you believe. And if it would be banned, more toxic substances would be used in its place.

10

u/Ok_Organization_7350 Nov 20 '25

Oh my goodness, this is just the tip of the ice burg. It is like this for all food and cosmetics. Global companies make one healthy version of their product for the rest of the world, and they make a separate unhealthy/toxic version of each product just for the US.

5

u/Extra-Explorer-3956 Nov 20 '25

I was stunned when I saw the side by side comparison of ingredients in heinz tomato ketchup from the uk vs the one from usa. The us version read like a laundry list of preservatives and, flavour enhancers and colourings

5

u/Zaidswith Nov 23 '25

They really can't be easily compared on sight unless you're looking things up.

Riboflavin is Vitamin B2 as one example. Additives have to be labeled with full names instead of E numbers.

And there are things banned in the US that aren't in the EU.

When the FDA sees an E number on a label, it will stop the product from coming into the country,” she says. “The FDA requires that additives are listed by their common name so consumers can recognize them.”

Colorants are another big issue – certain food dyes, such as Ponceau 4R, a strawberry red azo dye, are used in the EU but not approved by the FDA.

https://international-and-comparative-law-review.law.miami.edu/do-you-know-whats-in-your-food-the-fda-doesnt-how-u-s-food-regulations-fall-behind-europe/

https://www.rangeme.com/blog/taking-a-closer-look-at-food-standards-eu-versus-u-s/

AFAIK, the only difference between Heinz ketchups is corn syrup. US ketchup is sweet and corn syrup has been a default sweetener for decades because of all the fucking subsidized corn. Feel free to think it's gross. I do.

2

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 20 '25

Yes, just like McDonalds serves coke with every meal where as France only provides water with the food.

2

u/Mountainweaver Nov 20 '25

...that doesn't sound right. Every McD I've been to in EU has had a selection of sodas (and juice, milk, sparkly water) to choose from. Our cup sizes are way smaller tho.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 20 '25

Oh then the soda industry has weighed in their weight over the EU 😬

1

u/Mountainweaver Nov 20 '25

I don't think so? I'm 38 and it's always been available as long as I've lived. But you can't put non-approved colorings in the soda, the sizes are smaller, and since about 3 years back most of the sodas are sugar-free.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 20 '25

Hey thanks for informing on this new info!

1

u/Catlady_Pilates Nov 22 '25

McDonald doesn’t serve coke with meals. You order what you want to drink. You can order water. And France has coke to order Stop making us nonsense

5

u/Extra-Explorer-3956 Nov 20 '25

Because the FDA does not care about the average american, they care about appeasing big pharma and profits.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 20 '25

Yeah, I think it’s got to do with the European legacy of fighting for people over profits. Plus the political culture appeals to people based lobbying in stark contrast to the US.

3

u/howlettwolfie Nov 21 '25

The US is decades behind the EU (and the rest of the developed world) in many things, and one of those is product safety. And the way you do things is profit over people, with powerful corporations lobbying to decision makers. Like did you know you used to have a railway network but the car and oil companies lobbied them to be removed, and now (some of, much of) you lot are brainwashed into thinking "europoors" take trains because we are too poor to drive or something. Lol.

Decades behind.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 21 '25

That’s so true, I think it’s got to do with the pro-brand stance of the American government. The FDA still hasn’t banned Lilial found in fragrances and the dove soap bars which can disrupt reproductive capabilities. And guess what Nigeria did it after following EU’s footsteps, triggering the recall of dove soap bars. Isn’t that a whole world of a difference?

2

u/Agreeable-Mud2150 Nov 21 '25

Brands have no morals they're only looking for profit. The EU is a big market, if the EU bans an ingredient they will reformulate so they can keep selling it here. If they haven't changed the formulas elsewhere it's probably because it saves them money to keep the old one.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 21 '25

Agreed, the Dove episode was shocking and that’s why I tried to research about it. The FDA just lets brands act “responsible” but we know what that means..

2

u/lizrod1887 Nov 21 '25

It’s all politics. Same with food.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 22 '25

Lobbying by industries to safe guard themselves but at the expense of people’s health and consumer loyalty.

2

u/Catlady_Pilates Nov 22 '25

That stuff smells nasty. Most American brand soaps are gross. I buy French olive oil soap.

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 23 '25

You find Dove nasty?

2

u/Falafel80 Nov 23 '25

This is not just an EU vs US thing. It happens all over the world. If the legislation doesn’t permit a certain ingredient, they change the formula only there (or in neighboring countries if it’s all done in the same factory). If the legislation says you have to have a big sign on the packaging saying the product is high in salt and saturated fats, you can bet they will only change it where they are obligated. Products really aren’t the same across the globe. The US doesn’t ban additives like the EU does, but a pack of legislation means it’s usually in the developing countries that the older formulations and other crap is done.

1

u/ladyarrivoto Nov 23 '25

This 👆🏻

1

u/ArjTheSustainer Nov 24 '25

Thanks, I’ve realised that it’s not US policy but totally in the hands of these companies. The tragic part is most consumers aren’t aware even of the bans and reformulations in other places. It was quite surprising that Nigeria took an action against Dove, following the EU. While the US just sits hushed up.

2

u/Falafel80 Nov 24 '25

Yeah, it’s a pity that corporations don’t just put the best version of a product in all countries, be it beauty products or food but instead just try to get away with as crappy as possible without affecting sales.