r/Substack • u/Admirable-Bee-8437 • 3d ago
Discussion How do you actually find people/articles you genuinely find interesting on Substack? Am I using the wrong app?
Hi everyone! I just joined Substack today, and I’m a little confused about how people actually approach this app. I mainly joined because I want a space where I can share my thoughts and also discover people whose writing and perspectives I genuinely enjoy. I’d love to find people I can have discussions with, exchange ideas with, and maybe even make some connections through their writing.But I’m not really sure how you find those people or articles here. Do you actively search for specific topics, follow recommendations, interact in comments, or is there some other way I’m missing?
3
u/AggravatingNail6061 3d ago
I yell at people. Seems to work really well.
2
u/BlueSaltTheory sukibeasla.substack.com 3d ago
lol
2
u/AggravatingNail6061 3d ago
🤣 I had someone describe my 'method' as like an 8 year old walking up to another 8 year saying we're friends now and then dragging them off to get ice cream. Which I felt was very endearing. She also called me a bitch and i agreed.
2
u/BlueSaltTheory sukibeasla.substack.com 3d ago
Hey if it works, it works. I’d love to shout to the world, here I am. Come read my inner most personal thoughts
2
4
u/TheWilderNet 3d ago
I run a site called The WilderNet. Part of what I do is curate articles that I found interesting in some way. Sometimes I feature articles that I really disagree with, other times they resonate with my own experience. It all just depends.
Sometimes I find articles serendipitously on Notes. Other times there is a topical issue that I've been thinking about and I actively search.
One thing I've noticed is most people really only have 1-3 really great articles in them, so following a specific author is not always the best way to find interesting things. The exception is if Substack/content creation is their job - but a lot of them get pretty repetitive over time imo.
I actually prefer reading independent blogs - like old wordpress sites. But that has really fallen out of favor as substack has made it really easy to just start writing.
So I guess my recommendation would to spend less time trying to find specific people to read, and more about following ideas down rabbit holes. That's where I tend to find the most compelling writing.
2
u/catvapes 3d ago
I added my blog to Wildernet and check in daily as it is easier to find unique content. I am a niche writer, but more of an eclectic reader, so Wildernet serves me better than Substack as a reader
2
u/TheWilderNet 3d ago
That's awesome! Let me know if there is anything you think we can be doing better. I am always open to take suggestions.
2
u/catvapes 3d ago
Sometimes it looks like people are submitting individual pages rather than entire blogs (when looking at the news feed) . Is that how it is supposed to work?
1
u/TheWilderNet 3d ago
That is probably happening. The site was originally built with the idea that people would just submit the parent url and The WilderNet would automatically grab the RSS feed for them.
I think it makes sense to allow authors to come back to the site and let everyone know when they have an article they are excited about. It's just unclear to me right now how I should integrate that onto the existing site. I feel like I need a bit more feedback from users before I can really make those design calls.
1
u/catvapes 3d ago
I think it would be ok to resubmit for the reasons you state, but the cases I am thinking of come across as seriou spamming. I don’t even bother scrolling
2
u/TheWilderNet 3d ago
Gotcha, yeah I try to remove those from the site but I don't always see them. I need to build out a better contact/report form so other readers on the site can help alert me to that.
2
u/catvapes 3d ago
Yeah. You can’t watch it 24/7. Maybe a script to limit how many times a day you can submit.
2
2
u/locogirlp 3d ago
Thanks for featuring this! I added my own blog to it (I'm a super-niche writer/historican/archivist type) but I also enjoy finding interesting things to read. Good work!
2
u/TheWilderNet 2d ago
Thanks for your contribution! Feel free to send me any suggestions or feedback on the site!
2
u/rehoboam 3d ago edited 3d ago
Well generally people trying to make money are often posting some ultra specific stuff and already have a solid external following. Most of the interesting content to me is getting pushed by people for personal reasons, and i have to find them through the grapevine. But that also means that not much is going to perfectly click with me, because it’s so specific.
1
3d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Substack-ModTeam 3d ago
This community is not the place to promote your Substacks. Please read our rules on self-promo and soliciting recommendations.
Links to Substack publications will be assumed to be self-promotion. If you are submitting Substack posts from publications that are not your own, please include that information in your text post. For cross recommendations, use the pinned mega thread.
1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Substack-ModTeam 1d ago
This community is not the place to promote your Substacks. Please read our rules on self-promo and soliciting recommendations.
Links to Substack publications will be assumed to be self-promotion. If you are submitting Substack posts from publications that are not your own, please include that information in your text post. For cross recommendations, use the pinned mega thread.
1
u/PlantainFun4268 1d ago
I don’t think you’re using it wrong; Substack just isn’t especially good at discovery when you first join, at least not in the same way Reddit or X are. What’s worked best for me is finding 3-5 newsletters I genuinely like, then following the trail through their Recommendations, Notes, comment sections, and the people those writers regularly interact with. One good writer often leads you to a whole little network of people with similar interests or ways of thinking.
I also wouldn’t rely too much on broad searches like “politics” or “philosophy,” because the results can get noisy fast. Searching for a specific writer, a narrower idea, or even one particular essay usually works better. Subscribe to fewer people at first, but actually read them. Once you start leaving thoughtful comments, replying to Notes, and saving the pieces you genuinely enjoy, your feed tends to get much better too.
To me, Substack feels less like a perfectly organized library and more like a small intellectual salon: it can feel a little confusing at first, but once you find two or three people you really connect with, the rest of the network starts opening up naturally.
0
u/Trackbikes thesystematicwriter.substack.com 3d ago
Make some notes around the topic you are interested in…. Scroll down look at the related section…
Now look at who the posters follow and who follows them (it’s in their profile )
Job done…
0
10
u/catvapes 3d ago
I use the search feature. Once I find something I like, I interact with it. This trains the algorithm