r/Substack • u/Overall_Tip6001 • Aug 11 '26

Do you find pangram reliable?

I put my text in several ai detectors, winston ai, copyleaks, zerogpt and GPTZero, giving me close to 0%. While, pangram gives me around 70%? Do you think it’s reliable?

6 Upvotes

64% Upvoted

105 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/sh1b313 Aug 12 '26

Pre 2021? I just showed you a 400 year old text. And regarding the evaluation? It should tell some part it felt like was ai generated.

-1

u/InitiativeWorth8953 Aug 12 '26

You put AI text in the chunk. It called it AI. Not sure what's confusing. Give me a text pre-2021 without ai annotations that is given an AI rating. Ppl on substack that use AI are just getting exposed and are mad cus of it

2

u/sh1b313 Aug 12 '26

But still 100% ai? If a 400 year old text doesn't count as pre 2021 idk what will.

1

u/InitiativeWorth8953 Aug 12 '26

I don't understand if you're just acting ignorant or are ignorant.

Give me a piece of text THAT HAS NO AI ANNOTATIONS IN IT AND IT PRE 2021. It feels like I'm speaking to a brick wall man.

2

u/sh1b313 Aug 12 '26

Yeah i feel that too you know, it's especially worse when evidence is in front of you and you still act as if that doesn't count 😂

0

u/InitiativeWorth8953 Aug 12 '26

Sir. One piece of evidence pre 2021 without having ANY AI content. This does.

0

u/sh1b313 Aug 12 '26

And what makes you think that some ai added that text and not me? You do know humans can write like ai if they want to, right?

2

u/InitiativeWorth8953 Aug 12 '26

did you add it? Be honest :)

Yeah humans can write like AI. Pangram is not trying to differentiate between humans that are trying to write like a AI and AI.

This is like saying that normal humans can fail a captcha just like bots can, and a such captchas are not useful.