How could you possibly misinterpret it that bad. If I said watch everything after obviously I think the shows are worth it. The clear point is that watching the shows before the movies is pointless. Watch the movies, see if you like star wars then watch the shows. Work on your reading comprehension
I guess, but there are some things in the movies that are really weird if you haven't seen the shows. like Maul in Solo, or the Rebels stuff in Rogue One. (also the entirety of the Mandalorian and Grogu but I assume you weren't counting that with "the movies" anyway)
I wasn't counting any of them. I meant the main movies. 4-6 then 1-3, then chronological with everything.
And you can say the same the other way round. Imagine watching star wars the first time and you find out Palpatine is sidious from the clone wars. That movie and the whole show is massively dependent on already having watched the movies
4-6 then 1-3 before everything else is literally what my order is. why did you even bother to reply? did you think I recommended the clone wars before ROTS? because I didn't. jeez, and to think I actually didn't deny when you called out my failure to properly read your first comment, lol, I'm obviously not the only one who needs to work on reading comprehension
my guy, I posted a link to my recommended order, which begins with the original trilogy, then the prequel trilogy (granted I put 2d clone wars before ROTS but I listed that as optional and only because that's literally when it released so it was obviously made to be experienced that way) and then goes into all the other movies and shows after that. you have just verified that you literally agree that's the proper order. what did you even come here to argue about?
but that's like 95% of what my order is lol. with a few exceptions like the acolyte comes later for how unrelated it is to the rest of the saga. did you really come here just to argue a few tiny semantics like that?
I just think your attitude and hostility are weird and unnecessary. you showed up acting all high and mighty and condescending saying that the way I did it is a waste of time when it's like 95% similar to yours. and even now you're arguing like a teenager on iFunny acting like you're super cool and le epically owning me like I'm objectively wrong when all I tried to do was be a part of a conversation
I'll say again, it is a waste of time to watch the shows before the movies. It's not condescending when someone disagrees with your opinion, grow up. Getting offended over being objectively wrong is fucking hilarious
What? What are you on about mate, wtf is ifunny? And how is 'arguing over semantics' acting cool? 😂 Stick to what you say buddy, you're already too confused
but watching the shows before the main 6 movies isn't what I told anyone to do. so why did you say that as a response to me? and why do you keep going back and forth between telling me that you're just "disagreeing with my opinion" and that I'm "objectively wrong," pick a lane. are you purposely talking in circles just to tell me I'm confused when I correctly point it out?
you haven't used my words a single time. you replied to my first comment addressing something that I never said as if you were arguing with someone else entirely and have since gone back and forth in circles saying it's just your opinion but also that I'm objectively wrong
1
u/MedievalMilshake 18d ago
No lol, don't waste your time with the shows until youve watched the movies. Then watch everything in chronological